![]() |
Feb line awards
Does the gateway 2000 that runs our schedules get maintained by a [now unpaid] government worker that isn't at work?
|
They have till the 17th at 1800 to have them published.
|
Originally Posted by AlphaBeta
(Post 2743322)
They have till the 17th at 1800 to have them published.
|
Originally Posted by AlphaBeta
(Post 2743322)
They have till the 17th at 1800 to have them published.
|
Few notes from the scheduling VC...they identified illegal 717 rotations and the company decided to rebuild them. The company guys didn't work Saturday, not that I blame them. They have until the 17th to get the awards out. I can't even imagine what FB and this place would look like if they actually were awarded on the last day contractually required.
|
I was wondering if the timing of the AE coming out had anything to do with the delay.
|
Originally Posted by GliderCFI
(Post 2743325)
Thanks for the obvious. But in Feb....a pretty easy month....A awards would typically be published...
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk |
They are confident they can produce the awards quickly now and no longer work weekends. If the bids close Friday night they don’t start working them until Monday. It’s been this way for some time.
|
Originally Posted by crewdawg
(Post 2743333)
Few notes from the scheduling VC...they identified illegal 717 rotations and the company decided to rebuild them. The company guys didn't work Saturday, not that I blame them. They have until the 17th to get the awards out. I can't even imagine what FB and this place would look like if they actually were awarded on the last day contractually required.
|
Originally Posted by 3 green
(Post 2743353)
They should not have notified the company..The effected pilots would have been pay protected on those rotations.
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by GliderCFI
(Post 2743325)
Thanks for the obvious. But in Feb....a pretty easy month....A awards would typically be published...
|
Interesting stuff. I'm a bit cranky anyway after having my 17 hour bid-for and awarded layover at home converted to a short night somewhere else with a double DH through ATL. 7 hours total deadheading with nothing better than 757 economy. Naturally I'm annoyed today.
I'm officially 1 for 4 on awarded layovers at home remaining on my schedule. I'm not telling them where I live anymore. |
It does get old playing the waiting game every month. I wonder if it takes 4 or 5 days for awards to get published at UAL or AAL too. Seems like it shouldn't take more than a few hours.
|
Originally Posted by RJ4LIFE
(Post 2743404)
It does get old playing the waiting game every month. I wonder if it takes 4 or 5 days for awards to get published at UAL or AAL too. Seems like it shouldn't take more than a few hours.
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Trip7
(Post 2743405)
The 17th at 1800 is their contractual requirement. Anything ahead of that is icing on the cake.
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Peoloto
(Post 2743409)
Yup, Only thing we can do is ask to change it in the contract. Which we should IMO.
Originally Posted by GliderCFI
(Post 2743401)
Interesting stuff. I'm a bit cranky anyway after having my 17 hour bid-for and awarded layover at home converted to a short night somewhere else with a double DH through ATL. 7 hours total deadheading with nothing better than 757 economy. Naturally I'm annoyed today.
I'm officially 1 for 4 on awarded layovers at home remaining on my schedule. I'm not telling them where I live anymore. |
Maybe the possibility of a delay in the A220 certification is making them look harder at trying to cover that flying?
|
And EVERY SINGLE DEADHEAD over 2 hours should be comfort+ at a minimum. Anything in economy should be 150% pay. And no middle seats ever unless it's Delta one. But I may be a bit partial, since I'm about twice the height the economy seat was designed for.
As for UAL, they probably do get lines faster. Consider this: their last vacancy bid had published mock awards EVERY BUSINESS DAY so guys could see what they could expect and make adjustments. They also are much more limited in how much crew resources can "adjust" what's awarded vs what's offered. Ours take days, are done by hand, and often reflect something totally different than the seats initially offered. And yes I put all of that in the surveys a while back. |
Originally Posted by Han Solo
(Post 2743411)
What are you willing to trade for it? I don't disagree with your sentiment but unless it's a freebie outside normal contract negotiations I'll just sit tight until the 17th if/when required.
Originally Posted by RJ4LIFE
(Post 2743404)
It does get old playing the waiting game every month. I wonder if it takes 4 or 5 days for awards to get published at UAL or AAL too. Seems like it shouldn't take more than a few hours.
AAL - Close Noon on the 13th. Due by noon on the 16th. |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 2743342)
They are confident they can produce the awards quickly now and no longer work weekends. If the bids close Friday night they don’t start working them until Monday. It’s been this way for some time.
There was one case around 2010 where they didn’t come out until after the deadline on the 17th. |
Good Lord, the amount of complaining by A’s (on the FB group specifically) about the bids not being posted 2/3 days early is crazy. I thought Millennials were supposed to have the ‘entitled’ attitude.
|
Originally Posted by sidestep
(Post 2743444)
Good Lord, the amount of complaining by A’s (on the FB group specifically) about the bids not being posted 2/3 days early is crazy. I thought Millennials were supposed to have the ‘entitled’ attitude.
|
I was involved in the union auditing job at my last airline. I watched the computer publish the bids for 1700+ and it took on average 22 minutes for the program to spit out be resukts (FLICA, not our MSDOS software that Delta probably uses). The results published to the group within one hour of bids closing.
One other point, the guy who started this thread asked a question. Then gets chastised. Valid question since this is not normal to not have A’s awarded by pay day. He may not have known that there were illegal rotations in ATL. “What are you willing to trade for that?” This is a question that needs to stop being asked at every single turn. It’s a weak approach to negotiating, especially on small ticket items. |
A’s are out
|
Originally Posted by Viking busdvr
(Post 2743467)
A’s are out
|
Originally Posted by GliderCFI
(Post 2743456)
All about what you're used to I guess. What's normal turns into an expectation.
Originally Posted by PassportPlump
(Post 2743459)
I was involved in the union auditing job at my last airline. I watched the computer publish the bids for 1700+ and it took on average 22 minutes for the program to spit out be resukts (FLICA, not our MSDOS software that Delta probably uses). The results published to the group within one hour of bids closing.
Originally Posted by PassportPlump
(Post 2743459)
One other point, the guy who started this thread asked a question. Then gets chastised. Valid question since this is not normal to not have A’s awarded by pay day. He may not have known that there were illegal rotations in ATL.
|
The timeline doesn’t bother me much but knowing that the computer is capable of spitting it out within an hour (or a few hours, at worst) but they take 5 days is the troubling thing. It leads me to believe they are running the awards, modifying and tweaking, then running again. How often are the resulting bids better for me and how often are they better for the company?
The few times I got a glimpse of my schedule and then it changed, it was never better after the change. |
I'm pretty used to every response here being a combative one. I'd say most people who come on this forum, do so either to lurk and learn, or because they're mad at something. Being chastised by people stating obvious things are, like line awards, a simple expectation.
|
Originally Posted by SayMach
(Post 2743508)
The timeline doesn’t bother me much but knowing that the computer is capable of spitting it out within an hour (or a few hours, at worst) but they take 5 days is the troubling thing. It leads me to believe they are running the awards, modifying and tweaking, then running again. How often are the resulting bids better for me and how often are they better for the company?
The few times I got a glimpse of my schedule and then it changed, it was never better after the change. |
A’s are out.
|
Originally Posted by PassportPlump
(Post 2743459)
I was involved in the union auditing job at my last airline. I watched the computer publish the bids for 1700+ and it took on average 22 minutes for the program to spit out be resukts (FLICA, not our MSDOS software that Delta probably uses). The results published to the group within one hour of bids closing.
One other point, the guy who started this thread asked a question. Then gets chastised. Valid question since this is not normal to not have A’s awarded by pay day. He may not have known that there were illegal rotations in ATL. “What are you willing to trade for that?” This is a question that needs to stop being asked at every single turn. It’s a weak approach to negotiating, especially on small ticket items. |
I guess I don’t understand what the variables are then. What do they change before it is run again? The pairings are already decided so the only thing I can see them changing is the amount of open time allowed, hard lines vs reserve and maybe average line credit.
|
Originally Posted by SayMach
(Post 2743760)
I guess I don’t understand what the variables are then. What do they change before it is run again? The pairings are already decided so the only thing I can see them changing is the amount of open time allowed, hard lines vs reserve and maybe average line credit.
|
They publish the ALV and the bid window. They can run a solution that has buffers at the high and low end as long as they don't exceed the window. They can limit the number of 'Min credit' and 'Max credit' bids. I'm assuming they can tweak the number of RLLs. And they can adjust the open time constraints as long as they don't exceed PWA limits.
Lots of things to get the "cost" of a run down. Run/evaluate/run/evaluate/run/evaluate/send to ALPA for review/PUBLISH. |
Remember, the Company can move the threshold line value anywhere within the LCW and that will have varying outcomes. Take a look at the top of your category's Wide Report and see where the threshold line value ended up.
|
I see no reason 717 pilots should wait for 777 pilots' schedule completion, or vice versa? Why can't they be released as they are completed and reviewed by ALPA?
|
Originally Posted by TED74
(Post 2743838)
I see no reason 717 pilots should wait for 777 pilots' schedule completion, or vice versa? Why can't they be released as they are completed and reviewed by ALPA?
|
This is just for the curious.
There's a way you can see the trips it is assigning as it makes it's runs. I counted at least 5 runs on the B side. The final run occurring after the union looked it over I'm guessing. What I've seen is, sometimes the last trip or two in the month may change from run to run, but the first part of the month is usually pretty much the same each run. It gives you a very good idea of the exact days off you'll have. Here is the bad grammar version for those who want to have at it::D They is a way you's guys can see the trips it is assignen as it makes it's runs. I cownted at least 5 runs on the B side. The final run okurring after the union looked it over I'm gessing. What I done saw is, sometimes the last trip or too in the month may change from run two run, but the first part of the munth is usualie pritty much the same each run. It gives you very good eye-dea of the eggsact days off you'ns will have. |
Originally Posted by SayMach
(Post 2743760)
I guess I don’t understand what the variables are then. What do they change before it is run again? The pairings are already decided so the only thing I can see them changing is the amount of open time allowed, hard lines vs reserve and maybe average line credit.
Originally Posted by captkdobbs
(Post 2743807)
They publish the ALV and the bid window. They can run a solution that has buffers at the high and low end as long as they don't exceed the window. They can limit the number of 'Min credit' and 'Max credit' bids. I'm assuming they can tweak the number of RLLs. And they can adjust the open time constraints as long as they don't exceed PWA limits.
Lots of things to get the "cost" of a run down. Run/evaluate/run/evaluate/run/evaluate/send to ALPA for review/PUBLISH. If you want to see how the process work, give the PBS guys or the company a call. They're probably willing to have you down for the bid run and see what all goes on in the background. Like many things in life, it's always informative and enlightening to take a peak under the hood, rather than just sit back and chuck spears. |
Originally Posted by PilotJ3
(Post 2743859)
Exactly. If there were issues with the 717, they could run everything else first. Then do the 717 when the bid closed. Oh well, the As are out at least.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:35 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands