Search

Notices

DAL Buybacks

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-14-2019 | 01:22 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,823
Likes: 168
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by JamesBond
Oh... and are you in favor of jackets year round again?
Nah, just getting rid of the ties in the summer. We never made the decision to base pilot uniforms on old sea faring traditions of yore; that was a decision made a long time ago and we're stuck with it at this point. Fine.

The Navy and Marines wear their summer short sleeve dress Whites/Blues without a tie. Its not that they don't have ties anyway. They don't do it because it looks ridiculous with a short sleeve shirt. No one else in civilized society, government or private sector, does it either. Literally the only time you see such a display is airline pilots and in Dilbert comics.

Maybe we'll be able to rock beards with our ties in short sleeve shirts though. And with any luck, socks with sandals.
Reply
Old 06-14-2019 | 03:15 PM
  #22  
JamesBond's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 7,292
Likes: 0
From: A350 Both
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
Nah, just getting rid of the ties in the summer. We never made the decision to base pilot uniforms on old sea faring traditions of yore; that was a decision made a long time ago and we're stuck with it at this point. Fine.

The Navy and Marines wear their summer short sleeve dress Whites/Blues without a tie. Its not that they don't have ties anyway. They don't do it because it looks ridiculous with a short sleeve shirt. No one else in civilized society, government or private sector, does it either. Literally the only time you see such a display is airline pilots and in Dilbert comics.

Maybe we'll be able to rock beards with our ties in short sleeve shirts though. And with any luck, socks with sandals.
We'll be able to spark a doobie before that happens.
Reply
Old 06-14-2019 | 03:38 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 4,098
Likes: 462
Default

Originally Posted by JamesBond
We'll be able to spark a doobie before that happens.
No ties, beards, and doobies...I like where this is going!!
Reply
Old 06-14-2019 | 04:11 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,370
Likes: 0
From: 737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
Right. We're running a tight ship, but its also during the absolute easiest time in the history of the industry (including the much ballyhooed regulation era) where the difference between absolute genius and complete incompetent management teams is merely a matter of how many billions in profit you're making ATM.
I look at AA's numbers and beg to differ.
Reply
Old 06-15-2019 | 12:24 AM
  #25  
Denny Crane's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 6,971
Likes: 0
From: Kickin’ Back
Default

Originally Posted by BobZ
As the song goes...these are the good old days.
I loved the poster.....

Denny
Reply
Old 06-15-2019 | 04:33 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 2,960
Likes: 0
From: Power top
Default

Originally Posted by full of luv
Many of those other companies (AAL included) have also been spending Billions on their own stock buyback. The general logic is to buy your stock when you feel it's undervalued and you have excess cash without a better plan for investment.
Many an article has been written on both sides as to the efficacy of a company buying back it's own stock with excess cash.
Many see the fact that much of CEO's pay in recent decades has been tied to stock performance thereby clouds Mgmt's opinion of buying back it's own stock to reduce supply and drive up the demand/price.
Considering how our management compensates themselves, the buy backs fall under one side of the argument.
Reply
Old 06-15-2019 | 05:01 AM
  #27  
:-)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 0
Default

Buybacks are executive compensation, if it was for investors they would increase the dividend. It's laughable to think an airline can't deploy excess capital.
Reply
Old 06-15-2019 | 06:22 AM
  #28  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 783
Likes: 3
Default

Here is another paper that echos the opinions of most on this sight. It’s certainly a biased paper, but it’s interesting none the less.

http://rooseveltinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/RI_Buybacks-FAQ_022019-final.pdf

The issue I have is the last part of the paper, with the proposed solutions. A lot of that is government meddling in “private” money, which I am not a fan of, because ultimately it’s up for the free market to decide (at least in theory).

Last edited by mispoken; 06-15-2019 at 06:34 AM.
Reply
Old 06-15-2019 | 11:20 AM
  #29  
notEnuf's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,230
Likes: 677
From: ir.delta.com
Default

The free market is only a rhetorical concept. That said, government bailouts work. GM, Goldman, etc.
Reply
Old 06-15-2019 | 11:56 AM
  #30  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Default

Stock buybacks allow you to increase dividends without increasing the total amount you pay out. $1 mil paid out to 1 mil stockholders equals $1/share. $1 mil paid out to 500k stockholders equal $2/share. You’ve can increase dividend payouts without spending more money by buying back stock. Increasing dividend payouts and buying back stock are both good things.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Past V1
Major
88
07-16-2008 07:28 PM
BigGuns
Major
22
06-01-2008 06:16 AM
smiley
Major
47
06-04-2007 06:34 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices