|
Originally Posted by Gone Flying
(Post 3229961)
I’d love to bring all dual class flying to mainline, but I don’t see that happening without big changes to our contract.
It does not sound like there is a “talk about this” but more so a “it’s in the current contract and we plan to use it” You know what else is in the current contract? Pay rates for the 900s. This screams “we were violating scope, got caught, and now need to figure out how to do what we were doing anyway.” They don’t care about flow up or down. |
Originally Posted by Wolf424
(Post 3229978)
You know what else is in the current contract? Pay rates for the 900s.
This screams “we were violating scope, got caught, and now need to figure out how to do what we were doing anyway.” They don’t care about flow up or down. |
Originally Posted by PilotBases
(Post 3229936)
DCI already parked 50-60 CRJ200s and all will be gone by end of 2023. Ignoring these 35, this is the smallest DCI has been in well over a decade. With no CRJ900 replacement, the SpaceJet dead, and E-175 eventually on way out (E2 is too heavy for scope) time is on our side to watch it continue to shrink.
|
Originally Posted by Wolf424
(Post 3229978)
You know what else is in the current contract? Pay rates for the 900s.
This screams “we were violating scope, got caught, and now need to figure out how to do what we were doing anyway.” They don’t care about flow up or down. oh I completely agree, to my knowledge they are STILL flying mode than 188 76 seaters. Something something always keep your deals. On a side note would probably bid the CRJ900 if it came here. Pay aside I liked the layovers and I bet my seniority would be great |
Originally Posted by Mesabah
(Post 3229982)
You can still buy the old series ERJs, my guess is that's what they want to do, buy 35 of those. The 6 seats have already come out of some of the 900's, and I highly doubt they go back in.
Yes if you’re gonna have to put 76 seats in one jet, do it in the ERJ with greater MTOW and use the big wing. Burns a bit more so spreading the cost out on 76 seats and the more efficient 900 having 70 is probably a winner. |
Originally Posted by Iceberg
(Post 3229962)
I liked that too. He says they adjusted the large RJ fleet by the contractual amount after the flow-down was no longer available. Left out the part where it took them months and grievances to comply with the contract. Those planes should be left in the desert for spare parts.
|
Looks like the orange lanyards at Endeavor worked? Or was it the 35 RJs the company needed? Brave New World[emoji23]
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk |
I was not around for furloughs. Also, there are roughly one thousand improvements I’d like to see in our contract, and a flow-down provision has never been on that list. Should it be? If that’s the carrot to get us to yield on scope, I’m currently a huge “no thanks.”
|
Originally Posted by TED74
(Post 3230033)
I was not around for furloughs. Also, there are roughly one thousand improvements I’d like to see in our contract, and a flow-down provision has never been on that list. Should it be? If that’s the carrot to get us to yield on scope, I’m currently a huge “no thanks.”
|
Originally Posted by theUpsideDown
(Post 3230018)
i was told on here by someone it was a absolutely shocking we would hold the company to the contract during covid and to just not worry about it, because the arbitrator sure won't.
At least they weren’t violating scope provisions prior to the Covid dropoff... |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:49 PM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands