|
Originally Posted by Nick Bradshaw
(Post 3401960)
How will trips like that leave you time to shine your epaulettes?
|
Where do the majority of the NYC 73N trips start and end? I’d like to upgrade, but LGA is a better place to commute to for me vs JFK or EWR.
|
Originally Posted by DaGreenBanana
(Post 3401970)
Where do the majority of the NYC 73N trips start and end? I’d like to upgrade, but LGA is a better place to commute to for me vs JFK or EWR.
Sent from my SM-S908U using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by DaGreenBanana
(Post 3401970)
Where do the majority of the NYC 73N trips start and end? I’d like to upgrade, but LGA is a better place to commute to for me vs JFK or EWR.
Pre Covid is was JFK / LGA / EWR. You can always fly into LGA and Kew Cab it to JFK…$20 |
Originally Posted by DWC CAP10 USAF
(Post 3402252)
You can always fly into LGA and Kew Cab it to JFK…$20
EWR has nothing to do with either. That should be a layover city or a separate base. |
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 3402255)
JFK and LGA are reasonable "co-terminals" IMO. A motivated cab driver can get you between both (even in rush hour unless its really bad) in comparable times as getting between worst case gate transfers at a single airport.
EWR has nothing to do with either. That should be a layover city or a separate base. |
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 3402255)
JFK and LGA are reasonable "co-terminals" IMO. A motivated cab driver can get you between both (even in rush hour unless its really bad) in comparable times as getting between worst case gate transfers at a single airport.
EWR has nothing to do with either. That should be a layover city or a separate base.
Originally Posted by m3113n1a1
(Post 3402273)
LAX, BUR, SNA, and ONT are pretty ridiculous too.
|
Originally Posted by m3113n1a1
(Post 3402273)
LAX, BUR, SNA, and ONT are pretty ridiculous too.
|
Originally Posted by OOfff
(Post 3402422)
don’t forget LGB
In the past all those "co-terminals" were a company condition to even have a base there. Now they want a base there big time. Time to pull down most if not all of the "co-terminals". If hotel savings are such a cash machine they can open them as domiciles. |
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 3402784)
Yeah the LA "co-terminals" are a relic carrot from the days of a little micro base for the few who actually lived there. Now its a much larger base and will be full of commuters and new hires assigned it til they can bid out.
In the past all those "co-terminals" were a company condition to even have a base there. Now they want a base there big time. Time to pull down most if not all of the "co-terminals". If hotel savings are such a cash machine they can open them as domiciles. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:54 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands