![]() |
Originally Posted by Trip7
(Post 3395391)
Overall the trip quality at Delta remains the same just different aircraft flying them. Having flown the 88, 717 and 73N I know exactly what's happening.
One of your more arrogant posts…which is saying something. To suggest that you know what’s REALLY happening and the thousands of pilots saying something different should be, what… ignored? Corrected? You still have some growing up to do. |
Originally Posted by MJP27
(Post 3395412)
This is just plain wrong. As a junior CA on the 88 I routinely flew commutable 4 Day trips with a 30 hour layovers and only 14-15 days of block. Those do trips do not exist anymore on ANY fleet.
Put simply the trips available to me at 85% on the 88 were light years better than what I can now hold as a 320B at 30% Sent from my SM-S908U using Tapatalk |
peace love dope
(Drug reference working off "trip") |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 3395418)
Very different work rules during the time frames you mention. The credit increase had the company continued to build those rotations under current rules would be huge.
|
Originally Posted by Whoopsmybad
(Post 3395407)
I would say when your 5 day trip has 3 sub 12 hour layovers in a row (with 2 at 11 or worse), then one that’s 17 bringing up the average, that’s a bad trip for fatigue. I don’t care how many legs it comprises.
Sent from my SM-S908U using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Trip7
(Post 3395434)
First, you'll have to the clarify base. ATL for sure has plenty of commutable trips. Secondly the 320 is a much more capable plane range wise than the 88 so there is impact on the trip mix there. Lastly as far as 30 hr layovers those not only come and go but some pilots hate them which brings us back to my original thesis, confusion of the highest order
Sent from my SM-S908U using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by MJP27
(Post 3395440)
Sure, ATL has a more commutable trips. What's your point? I'm talking about the same base from 6 years ago. The trips are much worse. I challenge for you to find (more than a few outliers l)in the bid package trips that contain 6-7 hours of credit on any narrow body. 30,hour layovers or not. It is clear that trips have deteriorated and they have all but removed ALL the credit from most trips.
Sent from my SM-S908U using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Trip7
(Post 3395391)
...record amounts of overtime. ... Lastly, overtime is optional and record Greenslips are exacerbated by the reduction of the Greenslip trigger.
|
Originally Posted by neodd
(Post 3395449)
The problem with record of amounts of overtime is the underlying REAL problem, imo: record amounts of understaffing (or perhaps network overbidding capacity). Understaffing means reduced ability for swaps & drops, less or no control of schedule post award, more coverage awards, reroutes, IA etc. I believe that is the poorly communicated root cause. The folks that want to work more and get paid more are doing it. I don't think those are the ones complaining (as much). That folks that don't want to work overtime are still negatively effective. That would be a better message I think then too much double pay overtime.
Sent from my SM-S908U using Tapatalk |
Bad trip is when you aren’t sure how much you took and don’t know where you are or how long you’ve been out. I wish I could get a 30 hour 4 day. I’d work 8 days a month.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:16 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands