![]() |
Originally Posted by Trip7
(Post 3395494)
ATL had around 150 pilots, LAX 35. Considering the size of each base I'd consider the attendance sparse but that's just me. Folks can come to their own conclusion.
Sent from my SM-S908U using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Trip7
(Post 3395494)
ATL had around 150 pilots, LAX 35. Considering the size of each base I'd consider the attendance sparse but that's just me. Folks can come to their own conclusion.
Sent from my SM-S908U using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by boog123
(Post 3395512)
Conclusion, butt kissing not enough, Trip7 upping his game….
|
Originally Posted by Trip7
(Post 3395439)
This was standard fare or worse pre 117. DC9 had 4-5 leg days and 9 hrs in SAV. Granted back then with reduced rest layover pilots were limited to 10 hrs duty the next day. ASA CRJ200, standard fare:https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...01b65a6a2e.jpg
Sent from my SM-S908U using Tapatalk |
After listening to some of the Engage podcasts, it sounds like DALPA flags potential fatiguing rotations and sends them back to planners to mitigate if possible. If those rotations cannot be mitigated, does it could DALPA flag those rotations for pilots? It might be good safe SA especially for newly minted As and Bs to see a note on a rotation that it was flagged originally by the union and it was not mitigated for whatever reason?
|
Originally Posted by Trip7
(Post 3395494)
ATL had around 150 pilots, LAX 35. Considering the size of each base I'd consider the attendance sparse but that's just me. Folks can come to their own conclusion.
Sent from my SM-S908U using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Trip7
(Post 3395391)
Folks, somebody has to fly the RJ style flying. Mainline pilots clamored for this flying for years and now we're getting it, plus a lot more to come.
Now that the 88 is gone, everything but the 717 is pretty much a transcon capable plane which also means everything in between. Therefore even if we "took over" 100% of "regional" flying there's no excuse for 0-2% commutable trips or panicked plane changes/4 hour sits every single time just to save a couple minutes of credit for the EPS folks. Double "non-commutable" often circadian flipping barn burners. That Optimizer stuff isn't an inevitable consequence of "regional" flying; its mostly a consequence of the 2018 Optimizer. If short stage lengths always = horrendous QOL wrecking pairings, the Shuttle would have been just as bad because those are the shorter ends of the leg length spectrum anyway. The company needs to be made to eat some credit if they want to base everything everywhere and spread everything too thin. They are free to simplify the NB fleets and use fewer bases if they want, but supposedly we make trillions per day in savvy profits by spreading everything so thin, so its OK if we add credit back in because its paid for by definition. And we're told the Optimizer, if it exists, only adds 1-2% of efficiencies, so that proves it can be totally and completely eliminated at very little cost. |
My RJ flying, including the 717, was better than current 320 trips in my base. It’s not the flying, it’s the scheduling
|
Originally Posted by Trip7
(Post 3395391)
As you can probably already tell this thread is going to cause confusion of the highest order. Even the Union messenging is confused. The Union spokesperson at the sparsely attended picketings stated the message to management is we're tired, fatigued and it is because we are flying record amounts of overtime.
|
Originally Posted by ASAP
(Post 3395524)
Honest to God I feel like I’d quit immediately after flying a trip like that. Freaking brutal.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:18 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands