Search
Notices

737

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-25-2022, 03:59 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,898
Default

It's the stick force per G requirement. Highly doubt the average line pilot would have gotten close to a regime requiring that, or even feeling the difference once there.
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 05-25-2022, 05:39 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ebl14's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: 73N
Posts: 859
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy View Post
Stay on the subject , I'm on this plane now.

The documentary was just okay. There has been far too much misinformation about MCAS. Namely, why it had to exist in the first place. I cringe when I hear "to prevent a stall! because the engines are higher up." Not true. MCAS exists to keep the commonality with the NG in all regimes of flight. It was something done to keep certification with the NG the same. The MAX could have flown perfectly without MCAS, it just risked not being certified as the same type as the NG.

The MAX flies very nicely, it's a great airplane, and an improvement over the NG. The MAX9 compared to the NG is like the 321NEO to the A320. You can tell and feel the difference. They're both great airplane and a vast improvement over the NG and 320, respectively.

Now the next fiasco is going to be the MAX 10 certification. The FAA has already certified the MAX8+9 with the current annunciator panel recall like all other 737s. But now if it doesn't meet the certification deadline by the end of the year, they may force the MAX10 to have an EICAS setup. This could kill the MAX10 program. A lot of airlines have their future orders pegged to the MAX10 with the assumption that they will be similar to the MAX8 and 9 so pilots can fly all 3 variants. It honestly makes no sense to certify the MAX8/9 one way, and then force the 10 to be another way simply for a deadline. All future new airplanes (eg, a 797) should fall under the new guidelines, but the MAX 7/8/9/10 have been announced and planned for years and should be grandfathered in.

Time will tell. I still think Boeing will get it their way. The MAX10 should be certified like the MAX8/9 for commonality.
re: max-10:

Common sense would say, add EICAS, and add it to all max platforms and NGs and put out a computer training course that says, instead of hunting for lights just look at the screen. End of procedure.
ebl14 is offline  
Old 05-25-2022, 05:47 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DeltaboundRedux's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2020
Position: Enoch Powell Enthusiast
Posts: 2,124
Default

Originally Posted by ebl14 View Post
re: max-10:

Common sense would say, add EICAS, and add it to all max platforms and NGs and put out a computer training course that says, instead of hunting for lights just look at the screen. End of procedure.
Going to admit something here:

Went and saw an advanced screening of "Top Gun 2 - Maverick" last night. (Spoiler Alert: It did not "take my breath away". Talking to the old farts with US Navy caps on was fun though. AT LEAST half the audience had some kind of pilot rating because of TG1. It was like Oshkosh, only in a theatre)

There's this scene where Maverick and Goose's son "Rooster" steal an F-14 for plot reasons.

The F-14 was pretty bad arse 35 years ago. Even the RIO looked cool.

Now (and the plot TG2 alludes to it), it looks like junk.

This is what the "modern" 737 looks like compared to your basic CRJ.

An anachronism.

How is this even possible?
DeltaboundRedux is offline  
Old 05-25-2022, 06:01 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ebl14's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: 73N
Posts: 859
Default

Originally Posted by DeltaboundRedux View Post
Going to admit something here:

Went and saw an advanced screening of "Top Gun 2 - Maverick" last night. (Spoiler Alert: It did not "take my breath away". Talking to the old farts with US Navy caps on was fun though. AT LEAST half the audience had some kind of pilot rating because of TG1. It was like Oshkosh, only in a theatre)

There's this scene where Maverick and Goose's son "Rooster" steal an F-14 for plot reasons.

The F-14 was pretty bad arse 35 years ago. Even the RIO looked cool.

Now (and the plot TG2 alludes to it), it looks like junk.

This is what the "modern" 737 looks like compared to your basic CRJ.

An anachronism.

How is this even possible?
Haha! Yes! The worst part about the NG is that it has the screen space right there, but it just lays blank on a super expensive empty screen.
ebl14 is offline  
Old 05-25-2022, 08:19 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2006
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 2,370
Default

Originally Posted by DeltaboundRedux View Post

But for planes, the certification will certainly be a hurdle. Long term, I'd bet against Boeing (commercial airline division, anyway), hold Airbus, and expect China to dominate this market in our lifetimes (something everyone thought Airbus could never do 30 years ago).
Unless China has some type of political change, they will be similar to the soviet manufacturers in adaptation. They are currently closer to them than Airbus.
Baradium is offline  
Old 05-26-2022, 03:00 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 191
Default

Originally Posted by ebl14 View Post
re: max-10:

Common sense would say, add EICAS, and add it to all max platforms and NGs and put out a computer training course that says, instead of hunting for lights just look at the screen. End of procedure.
100% this. If the classics and the NGs can be the same type rating with just some minor differences training, then there is no reason why they can’t do precisely what you say.
KPer is offline  
Old 05-26-2022, 03:56 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2016
Posts: 397
Default

Originally Posted by DeltaboundRedux View Post
Going to admit something here:

Went and saw an advanced screening of "Top Gun 2 - Maverick" last night. (Spoiler Alert: It did not "take my breath away". Talking to the old farts with US Navy caps on was fun though. AT LEAST half the audience had some kind of pilot rating because of TG1. It was like Oshkosh, only in a theatre)

There's this scene where Maverick and Goose's son "Rooster" steal an F-14 for plot reasons.

The F-14 was pretty bad arse 35 years ago. Even the RIO looked cool.

Now (and the plot TG2 alludes to it), it looks like junk.

This is what the "modern" 737 looks like compared to your basic CRJ.

An anachronism.

How is this even possible?
I saw the advanced screening Tuesday. I thought it was very well directed and overall a good movie for what it was. I’m not big on revisiting old “classics,” but I think they did a fair amount of lookbacks to the old and bringing some of the new in. That said, parts were definitely overacted and there was some corny cringe factors for sure, but I’m glad I went and saw it in the theater.
StickPig is offline  
Old 05-26-2022, 06:05 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: UNA
Posts: 4,419
Default

Originally Posted by ebl14 View Post
re: max-10:

Common sense would say, add EICAS, and add it to all max platforms and NGs and put out a computer training course that says, instead of hunting for lights just look at the screen. End of procedure.
i have no idea why they did not do this in the first place. You can even leave the stupid recall system in place and just add the eicas if that would help.

system synoptic pages would also be a nice option on the lower DU.
Gone Flying is offline  
Old 05-26-2022, 07:12 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
notEnuf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: stake holder ir.delta.com
Posts: 10,034
Default

Originally Posted by ebl14 View Post
re: max-10:

Common sense would say, add EICAS, and add it to all max platforms and NGs and put out a computer training course that says, instead of hunting for lights just look at the screen. End of procedure.
I'm not a fan of the recall on the 737 but it's just a repeater. Press the button and glance at the overhead for any orange (amber, whatever) there is no guarantee the 6 each side will light (inop bulb etc.) but if one does, QRH. It's rudimentary but the recall/system lights are only there to put a light in your face for easy viewing. It's not that hard.
notEnuf is offline  
Old 05-26-2022, 07:19 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesBond's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: A350 Both
Posts: 7,292
Default

Originally Posted by firstmob View Post
Currently reading Flying Blind interesting and frightening at the same time!
If you are talking about the Mary Schiavo book, spot on. If I remember correctly she was the DOT IG or something that exposed the dual mandate of the FAA and the obvious double standard they had in promoting aviation and their responsibility as the safetynet. She got the moniker "Scary Mary", but she was 100% right. It clearly points out how the government is not really interested in public safety, but control over every aspect of our lives. I have always wondered why the .gov is running day to day ATC operations rather than just ensuring that those that are are dong so in a standard manner in accordance with DOT guidelines/rules. What it is now is a classic case of the fox guarding the hen house.
JamesBond is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
docav8tor
Southwest
14
02-22-2020 03:59 PM
AirBear
Safety
4
11-28-2019 05:05 PM
docav8tor
Safety
0
10-02-2019 02:07 PM
docav8tor
Safety
10
09-24-2019 12:20 PM
docav8tor
Safety
7
07-10-2019 10:20 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices