![]() |
Originally Posted by Big E 757
(Post 3535860)
I agree with you Fangs, but he’s not wrong.
|
Originally Posted by Starcheck102
(Post 3535636)
As usual, it’s Councils 1, 16, and 54 versus everyone who wants a contract.
The Council 66 chairman showed his true colors as a sore loser. It was bad enough that he scheduled something as important as a recall meeting after the December bids had closed, his hysterical email demonstrates why he isn’t qualified for the top job at the Delta MEC. Council 1 trying to weigh in on another council’s business is just dandy, because everyone knows that air line pilots love carpetbaggers. |
Originally Posted by MJP27
(Post 3535871)
I don't know DH or TK, they weren't my reps. However, TK sending out that C66 update was just sour grapes and inappropriate in what hopefully is the final stages section 6 negotiations. He clearly doesn't have the temperament to MEC Chairman. I'm glad he wasn't elected.
|
Originally Posted by JamesBond
(Post 3535888)
At least he's qualified and current as a Delta pilot.
|
Originally Posted by JamesBond
(Post 3535888)
At least he's qualified and current as a Delta pilot.
|
Originally Posted by JamesBond
(Post 3535888)
At least he's qualified and current as a Delta pilot.
|
I’m not worried at all about the PWA negotiations being affected by this. The NC has been doing a great job holding the line while the situation around us develops into a great environment. $100K signing bonuses for regional FOs, profits returning and revenues at their highs, FAs with 4+16% increases this year, billions available for investments in partnerships after billions lost on those same partnerships, WB orders and rumors of more, economies of scale driving costs down as we return to 100+% flying, recruiting needs at an all time high, GSs and fatigue calls pointing to necessary QOL changes, inflation driven pilot exceptions, massively failed underwhelming TAs at peer carriers and “me too” at the only laggard to have ratified.
The MEC has a mandate and a pilot group with an expectation to deliver. Any sub par AIP will be highly scrutinized and with a 9 to 8 majority a robust con paper and debate could easily swing a single vote, however MEMRAT will prevail. This is the best ever environment for section 6 in my career and that of anyone I know. The unwashed masses will see to this PWA being epic. I have no doubt. |
Originally Posted by notEnuf
(Post 3535903)
I’m not worried at all about the PWA negotiations being affected by this. The NC has been doing a great job holding the line while the situation around us develops into a great environment. $100K signing bonuses for regional FOs, profits returning and revenues at their highs, FAs with 4+16% increases this year, billions available for investments in partnerships after billions lost on those same partnerships, WB orders and rumors of more, economies of scale driving costs down as we return to 100+% flying, recruiting needs at an all time high, GSs and fatigue calls pointing to necessary QOL changes, inflation driven pilot exceptions, massively failed underwhelming TAs at peer carriers and “me too” at the only laggard to have ratified.
The MEC has a mandate and pilot expectation to deliver. Any sub par AIP will be highly scrutinized and with a 9 to 8 majority a robust con paper and debate could easily swing a single vote, however MEMRAT will prevail. This is the best ever environment for section 6 in my career and that of anyone I know. The unwashed masses will see to this PWA being epic. I have no doubt. |
Originally Posted by Starcheck102
(Post 3535787)
My gut says you’re being insincere. You may have noticed that the loudest bunch of whiners and sore losers in our union’s history are the same churls who voted against LOA 20-03 and 20-04.
|
Originally Posted by m3113n1a1
(Post 3535894)
Plenty of current and qualified pilots I wouldn't want leading our MEC.
Originally Posted by CBreezy
(Post 3535898)
It really just depends on whose "side" he's on. People argued incessantly about reps who intentionally avoided flying the line by either becoming non-current through strategic drops of leave or delaying courses for months. Personally, I don't think anyone should be allowed to be a rep and not be current. However, I've argued this unsuccessfully about other reps whom I'm sure you support. One, who I am sure you support, was NFLY when he ran for LEC rep last year. No one seemed to care that he wasn't current or qualified because he was a champion of the DZ.
Originally Posted by MJP27
(Post 3535900)
Aaaaaand? Doesn't mean he was the right choice. And for the record, I believe reps should be qualified and current as a Delta pilot.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:56 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands