Search
Notices

C066 Update

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-31-2022, 01:25 PM
  #351  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,117
Default

Originally Posted by CX500T View Post
It does blow my mind that we have/had one rate for the 757-200, 757-300, 767-200, 767-300 and 767-300ER but a different rate for A319/20, A321 and 321neo.
Or when the 90 still paid more than the 88 after we merged 73 rates....🤔🙄
FL370esq is offline  
Old 12-31-2022, 04:22 PM
  #352  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FL370's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: A somewhere
Posts: 393
Default

Originally Posted by nwaf16dude View Post
73 guy here…agree. I always thought it was pretty silly that the 73 paid more than the 320. I chalked it up to merger politics; glad to see that fixed.
I agree. Flown both. Now on the 320 by choice, but don't understand why the 737 paid more.
FL370 is offline  
Old 12-31-2022, 05:01 PM
  #353  
Roll’n Thunder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: Pilot
Posts: 3,555
Default

Originally Posted by FL370 View Post
I agree. Flown both. Now on the 320 by choice, but don't understand why the 737 paid more.
Combat Pay.
tennisguru is offline  
Old 12-31-2022, 06:48 PM
  #354  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Schwanker's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,226
Default

Originally Posted by FL370 View Post
I agree. Flown both. Now on the 320 by choice, but don't understand why the 737 paid more.
cuz it was a south airplane
Schwanker is offline  
Old 12-31-2022, 11:57 PM
  #355  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Big E 757's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: A320 Left seat
Posts: 2,580
Default

Originally Posted by Schwanker View Post
cuz it was a south airplane

Not really….the 737-800 enjoyed the powerful negotiating tool in the contract referred to as 3.B.6. The company couldn’t operate an aircraft until a pay rate was agreed to. The 777 was the only other aircraft brought in while we had this in our contract.

After the merger, I think the A319/320 paid less, compared to the 737 fleet is because we only had 10 737-700’s, vs. the 319/320, where we had more 319’s than 320’s, so an average seat count on that fleet was probably 140 on the airbus, vs 160 on the 737. Just my opinion, but the 737 was almost all 160 seat aircraft and the Airbus had 130-160, with a slight lean towards the 130 seater, so ALPA accepted the lower pay on the Airbus. I know I didn’t explain it the way my mind sees it, it’s late and I should be in bed.

Happy New Year!

I agree completely with the sentiment that it doesn’t make sense the 75/76 pays the same rate when we have 3 separate pay rates for the A320 fleet though. That fleet is underpaid across the board.
Big E 757 is offline  
Old 01-01-2023, 04:43 AM
  #356  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default

Originally Posted by Big E 757 View Post
Not really….the 737-800 enjoyed the powerful negotiating tool in the contract referred to as 3.B.6. The company couldn’t operate an aircraft until a pay rate was agreed to. The 777 was the only other aircraft brought in while we had this in our contract.

After the merger, I think the A319/320 paid less, compared to the 737 fleet is because we only had 10 737-700’s, vs. the 319/320, where we had more 319’s than 320’s, so an average seat count on that fleet was probably 140 on the airbus, vs 160 on the 737. Just my opinion, but the 737 was almost all 160 seat aircraft and the Airbus had 130-160, with a slight lean towards the 130 seater, so ALPA accepted the lower pay on the Airbus. I know I didn’t explain it the way my mind sees it, it’s late and I should be in bed.

Happy New Year!

I agree completely with the sentiment that it doesn’t make sense the 75/76 pays the same rate when we have 3 separate pay rates for the A320 fleet though. That fleet is underpaid across the board.
It ended up paying less in the joint contract because there was only so much money the company was willing to put up for the joint contract. The lower pay rates meant the bulk of that pot of money was going to North pilots because their pay rates were lower than the South rates. The joint contract had to be ratified by both sides. They needed to provide some raises to the South or the joint contract would not have been ratifiable.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 01-01-2023, 07:28 AM
  #357  
Gets Weekends Off
 
notEnuf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: stake holder ir.delta.com
Posts: 10,034
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
It ended up paying less in the joint contract because there was only so much money the company was willing to put up for the joint contract. The lower pay rates meant the bulk of that pot of money was going to North pilots because their pay rates were lower than the South rates. The joint contract had to be ratified by both sides. They needed to provide some raises to the South or the joint contract would not have been ratifiable.
The majority of the raises went to NWA fleets because they were well behind DAL fleets. The JCBA did a lot for former north pilots but it still had inconsistencies that brought resentment. Retirement and A320 and A330 category (747 for a select few) pay were some of the chief complaints. Seniority was a separate issue but was also a huge contributor to tribalism.
notEnuf is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EWRflyr
United
9
01-28-2012 11:34 AM
jetguy
Hangar Talk
3
09-23-2010 10:56 AM
CA Jimenez
United
8
09-06-2010 05:42 AM
Voski
Pilot Health
2
12-08-2009 02:24 PM
chrtrplt
Cargo
16
09-24-2006 12:17 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices