TA: GVUL
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,877
Likes: 194
Yeah yeah…make your own research. Stop spewing Dave Ramsey Bs.
Anyone that is young enough should use it as an alternative to 401k, Social Security, etc. Mine is paying 4% guarantee growth + dividends (this year 5.75%). And I can read my contract just fine, it’s all spelled black and white, not like our PWA.
Anyone with PBGC, is already late to the game for the WLI. Anyone that’s in their 20s-low 30s, compounding alone can be very lucrative at retirement. I could probably just use dividends at retirement for extra income.
Anyone that is young enough should use it as an alternative to 401k, Social Security, etc. Mine is paying 4% guarantee growth + dividends (this year 5.75%). And I can read my contract just fine, it’s all spelled black and white, not like our PWA.
Anyone with PBGC, is already late to the game for the WLI. Anyone that’s in their 20s-low 30s, compounding alone can be very lucrative at retirement. I could probably just use dividends at retirement for extra income.
Last edited by sailingfun; 10-15-2023 at 10:08 AM.
#23
Having heard multiple pitches for various high cash value policies the conclusion I keep reaching is buying term and investing the difference in a tax efficient ETF works better. I haven't looked at the Delta GVUL numbers specifically, but I doubt they tell a different story. The general premise behind the policies it to bundle insurance and an investment in such a complicated manner that the buyer rarely understands exactly what is going on. The insurance company gets a lifetime of deposits with only one redemption option that doesn't involve hefty fees and surrender charges.
On the flip side. Life insurance companies are a great source of long term financing for investment property. Just to be clear I'm talking about a life company real estate loan, not a cash value policy loan.They are cash rich with a low cost of capital (ie low returns to policyholders) and expect to hold the capital for decades before returning it.
#24
On Reserve
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 85
Likes: 2
From: 350B
That sounds like spending a dollar to save a dime.
Having heard multiple pitches for various high cash value policies the conclusion I keep reaching is buying term and investing the difference in a tax efficient ETF works better. I haven't looked at the Delta GVUL numbers specifically, but I doubt they tell a different story. The general premise behind the policies it to bundle insurance and an investment in such a complicated manner that the buyer rarely understands exactly what is going on. The insurance company gets a lifetime of deposits with only one redemption option that doesn't involve hefty fees and surrender charges.
On the flip side. Life insurance companies are a great source of long term financing for investment property. Just to be clear I'm talking about a life company real estate loan, not a cash value policy loan.They are cash rich with a low cost of capital (ie low returns to policyholders) and expect to hold the capital for decades before returning it.
Having heard multiple pitches for various high cash value policies the conclusion I keep reaching is buying term and investing the difference in a tax efficient ETF works better. I haven't looked at the Delta GVUL numbers specifically, but I doubt they tell a different story. The general premise behind the policies it to bundle insurance and an investment in such a complicated manner that the buyer rarely understands exactly what is going on. The insurance company gets a lifetime of deposits with only one redemption option that doesn't involve hefty fees and surrender charges.
On the flip side. Life insurance companies are a great source of long term financing for investment property. Just to be clear I'm talking about a life company real estate loan, not a cash value policy loan.They are cash rich with a low cost of capital (ie low returns to policyholders) and expect to hold the capital for decades before returning it.
Not really a down side.
#25
On Reserve
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
I thought this was a potential REPLACEMENT for the company provided Term Life insurance. The one the company pays all the premiums for an we just get the imputed income. By my understanding, the Company would pay all the premiums for this product, our imputed income is lower, and we get the investment opportunities for it. Makes the whole argument for buying term vs whole life go out the window. Am I wrong in my understanding of how it is going to work?
I generally agree though, if you are paying the premiums term vs whole is the conventional wisdom winner.
Hopefully we can get some more info from the Company and Union on this new product. A podcast on it, plus the other changes like the new dental options, would be great before open enrollment.
I generally agree though, if you are paying the premiums term vs whole is the conventional wisdom winner.
Hopefully we can get some more info from the Company and Union on this new product. A podcast on it, plus the other changes like the new dental options, would be great before open enrollment.
#26
Line Holder
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 652
Likes: 6
But we’re not talking about investing your own money. This is a company paid policy. (At least that’s my understanding.) So the question becomes is it better to have the likely higher value term policy (that pays nothing if you make it to retirement). Or a vehicle that leaves you with some value after you stop working for Delta. I’ll wait for more details and pass it to my financial advisor but it seems to be a viable option (especially for those that don’t really need the life insurance anyways).
#27
You got 5.75% this year. Now account for where the costs were pulled out and what your real yield is. When you look at what they now claim the policy is worth is that the actual cash value, some form of death value or other nebulous value that can’t be accessed? How many pages is your contract? When did you purchase this policy and if you cashed out today what will you get verses what you have invested? What is the surrender charge to get your money back? I Stupidly bought an annuity from one of the highest rated companies around and offered a 7% guarantee. Never in reality saw anything close to that.
4% guaranteed + 5.75% dividends.
If I cash out today, I’ll be around 7k more per year that what I’ve put on.
Also look at how much Mutual life insurance companies have paid in the last 34yrs.
#28
The biggest advantage to whole life policies or annuities are the absolutely phenomenal amounts of money they make for the selling agent and the company. Costs that you can’t even see are baked in everywhere and you need a attorney who specializes in these policies to even read the contract.
As mentioned by others if you are near retirement age you should be fully self insured as a Delta pilot. In addition if you have a PBGC benefit you have not started drawing you have an excellent free insurance product.
The company provided insurance is also not that expensive. Strangely some pilots think the imputed income number is the actual amount you pay in taxes.
As mentioned by others if you are near retirement age you should be fully self insured as a Delta pilot. In addition if you have a PBGC benefit you have not started drawing you have an excellent free insurance product.
The company provided insurance is also not that expensive. Strangely some pilots think the imputed income number is the actual amount you pay in taxes.
That sounds like spending a dollar to save a dime.
Having heard multiple pitches for various high cash value policies the conclusion I keep reaching is buying term and investing the difference in a tax efficient ETF works better. I haven't looked at the Delta GVUL numbers specifically, but I doubt they tell a different story. The general premise behind the policies it to bundle insurance and an investment in such a complicated manner that the buyer rarely understands exactly what is going on. The insurance company gets a lifetime of deposits with only one redemption option that doesn't involve hefty fees and surrender charges.
On the flip side. Life insurance companies are a great source of long term financing for investment property. Just to be clear I'm talking about a life company real estate loan, not a cash value policy loan.They are cash rich with a low cost of capital (ie low returns to policyholders) and expect to hold the capital for decades before returning it.
Having heard multiple pitches for various high cash value policies the conclusion I keep reaching is buying term and investing the difference in a tax efficient ETF works better. I haven't looked at the Delta GVUL numbers specifically, but I doubt they tell a different story. The general premise behind the policies it to bundle insurance and an investment in such a complicated manner that the buyer rarely understands exactly what is going on. The insurance company gets a lifetime of deposits with only one redemption option that doesn't involve hefty fees and surrender charges.
On the flip side. Life insurance companies are a great source of long term financing for investment property. Just to be clear I'm talking about a life company real estate loan, not a cash value policy loan.They are cash rich with a low cost of capital (ie low returns to policyholders) and expect to hold the capital for decades before returning it.
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 2,286
Likes: 18
I think both of you guys are missing the point of the question. This isn't about whether whole/universal is better than term in general, or on the open market. The question is about our new choice in company paid insurance, negotiated under C19 (PWA 25.G.10 if you need the reference). We get to choose between regular term life, or GVUL, and the death benefit is the same (at least originally). Why, or why not, would you choose one over the other?
#30
Exactly. Not a fan of indexed annuities or most of the non term life insurance schemes… but a premium paid by the company potentially makes it a different animal. Hard to make a real judgment until we get all the details.


