![]() |
Well, he volunteered to do union work(thereby making him a volunteer wannabe) until he got turned down. maybe that accounts for some of the butthurt?
|
Originally Posted by JamesBond
(Post 3604006)
Good for them? I do a lot more as an LCP than just the bare minimum. Doesn't make me a volunteer.
Either you are both volunteers, or no? |
Originally Posted by chrisreedrules
(Post 3604011)
Honestly guy, you’re so full of it. You kill your own credibility because you so clearly post emotionally-driven tripe and don’t even have the facts. When was the last time YOU volunteered to do anything with ALPA?
When faced with actual facts, he simply ignores those posts and moves to another topic to screech about. He’s a bad faith poster and the fact that he’s a LCA is pathetic and embarrassing for this airline. Claims to be a LCA on the A350 but supposedly lives in a house one step above a trailer that nobody here would ever think about living in. Clearly there’s something wrong with this guy, and I just hope one day he gets whatever help he needs. Until then, it’s pointless to respond to his impotent rants. |
Y'all are a blast.
|
Originally Posted by JamesBond
(Post 3604222)
Y'all are a blast.
|
Originally Posted by MJP27
(Post 3603951)
This line of reasoning cracks me up. Aren't reps supposed to represent their individual council? If their Council voted 80% + in favor and they voted no, did they represent their councils will??? I mean the overall percentage worked out (by coincidence) but so what.
|
I'm a paid volunteer. Delta paid me a few years back to do EAA young eagles rides. The choice to work in an office in ATL is what I question. You couldn't pay me enough.
|
Originally Posted by notEnuf
(Post 3604363)
With the benefit of hind sight, but then why have an MEC? Or all votes could be roll call so they get the percentages right based on polling. :rolleyes:
|
Originally Posted by JamesBond
(Post 3604374)
Isn't that exactly what they did regarding at least one of the inviolable 'pillars'?
|
Originally Posted by JamesBond
(Post 3604374)
Isn't that exactly what they did regarding at least one of the inviolable 'pillars'?
|
Originally Posted by FangsF15
(Post 3604398)
Oh for Pete’s sake, please stop. Please.
|
Originally Posted by JamesBond
(Post 3604423)
truth hurts?
Does “laces out!” mean anything to you? |
Originally Posted by JamesBond
(Post 3604374)
Isn't that exactly what they did regarding at least one of the inviolable 'pillars'?
|
Originally Posted by FangsF15
(Post 3604429)
LOL. No, because you’ve been beating that drum for 100+ separate posts about it.
Does “laces out!” mean anything to you? |
Originally Posted by CBreezy
(Post 3604433)
As a 350A LCP, he probably always has people nodding along to his unhinged rants. He can't fathom that anyone would disagree with him.
|
Originally Posted by smellson
(Post 3604431)
They offered you an early out.....that was your retirement pillar.....really should have taken it
|
Originally Posted by FangsF15
(Post 3604429)
LOL. No, because you’ve been beating that drum for 100+ separate posts about it.
Does “laces out!” mean anything to you? |
Originally Posted by JamesBond
(Post 3604441)
And how exactly would that have worked? Was there some kind of bonus that wasn't published?
|
Originally Posted by OOfff
(Post 3604445)
blank slate on retirement: for you, what would a satisfactory contract result have been for c19? What kind of numbers and format did you want?
No I get it. But it's a trap question. Because anything I say you are going to turn into a "yeah but we aren't getting that so it's coming out of MY pocket so **** you". Remember this. You didn't lose your retirement either. You are benefitting directly from what was taken from us and the way it was done. And you responded that retirement wasn't important to you because you have your full retirement from Delta. |
Originally Posted by JamesBond
(Post 3604441)
And how exactly would that have worked? Was there some kind of bonus that wasn't published?
|
Can somebody explain why LA, with around 1,000 pilots needs Reps who never fly and Atlanta with 4,800 pilots have Reps that do fly?
I was out in LA for lounge week several times. Never once saw anyone at the ALPA table. Not once, middle of the morning or afternoon. An empty chair making half a million a year in pay and benefits. The LA pilots re-elected them. An elected Treasurer isn’t enforcing the rules against those who elected him. ALPA needs a judiciary function. |
Originally Posted by smellson
(Post 3604455)
Even better, you got to leave this miserable union, and you still got paid! I'm shocked how many miserable 60+ yr olds I'm still flying with. Must have missed the memo
|
Originally Posted by JamesBond
(Post 3604465)
I'm not at all miserable. I love my job. So much that I am really hoping to stay to 67 or even longer.
|
Originally Posted by JamesBond
(Post 3604453)
Something greater than the zero we got.
No I get it. But it's a trap question. Because anything I say you are going to turn into a "yeah but we aren't getting that so it's coming out of MY pocket so **** you". Remember this. You didn't lose your retirement either. You are benefitting directly from what was taken from us and the way it was done. And you responded that retirement wasn't important to you because you have your full retirement from Delta. |
Originally Posted by JamesBond
(Post 3604453)
Something greater than the zero we got.
No I get it. But it's a trap question. Because anything I say you are going to turn into a "yeah but we aren't getting that so it's coming out of MY pocket so **** you". Remember this. You didn't lose your retirement either. You are benefitting directly from what was taken from us and the way it was done. And you responded that retirement wasn't important to you because you have your full retirement from Delta. |
Originally Posted by OOfff
(Post 3604510)
With all these strawmen, who needs actually discussions?
|
Don't care for the recently passed TA?
Hoping for something better next time around? Forcefully worded letters are a start. Cathartic, anyway. Useful? Not so much. But building a constituency and storming the castle to take over the LECs and MECs for the next TA needs to begin now. Small but tightly organized groups with extremely narrow interests always dominate in politics and organizations of any size. (I'm actually happy enough with the current TA. Does anyone here talk to other airline pilots, much less normal people? 1 year ER captains, and $400k/yr for top-of-pay scale captains? Holy crêpe, we're a spoiled bunch. It wouldn't be that difficult to storm the barricades and dominate the agenda for the next turning of the wheel though. The MEC is nominally your "governing body". It's not the Holy See, however. Voting turnouts for LEC reps are insanely low, and will decrease over the next couple of years as everyone accepts the "new normal" that is the current TA. Want to have a major impact/influence on the next TA? The time to plot and plan is Right. Friking. Now.) There's no better book about this than: The Populist Delusion - Neema Parvina. Everything you ever wanted to know about how actual politics truly work. Best book I've read in a decade. It's a SERIOUS ENDEAVOUR. Whining on an online forum, or reading a statement at a MEC meeting, isn't going to move a needle. |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 3604461)
Can somebody explain why LA, with around 1,000 pilots needs Reps who never fly and Atlanta with 4,800 pilots have Reps that do fly?
I was out in LA for lounge week several times. Never once saw anyone at the ALPA table. Not once, middle of the morning or afternoon. An empty chair making half a million a year in pay and benefits. The LA pilots re-elected them. An elected Treasurer isn’t enforcing the rules against those who elected him. ALPA needs a judiciary function. |
Originally Posted by DeltaboundRedux
(Post 3604533)
Don't care for the recently passed TA?
Hoping for something better next time around? Forcefully worded letters are a start. Cathartic, anyway. Useful? Not so much. But building a constituency and storming the castle to take over the LECs and MECs for the next TA needs to begin now. Small but tightly organized groups with extremely narrow interests always dominate in politics and organizations of any size. (I'm actually happy enough with the current TA. Does anyone here talk to other airline pilots, much less normal people? 1 year ER captains, and $400k/yr for top-of-pay scale captains? Holy crêpe, we're a spoiled bunch. It wouldn't be that difficult to storm the barricades and dominate the agenda for the next turning of the wheel though. The MEC is nominally your "governing body". It's not the Holy See, however. Voting turnouts for LEC reps are insanely low, and will decrease over the next couple of years as everyone accepts the "new normal" that is the current TA. Want to have a major impact/influence on the next TA? The time to plot and plan is Right. Friking. Now.) There's no better book about this than: The Populist Delusion - Neema Parvina. Everything you ever wanted to know about how actual politics truly work. Best book I've read in a decade. It's a SERIOUS ENDEAVOUR. Whining on an online forum, or reading a statement at a MEC meeting, isn't going to move a needle. What are you really wanting to covey? Is it “we will get em next time” or “benchmark here and move up”? Contract passed, what’s the concept going forward? The Holy See beacons the idea of eternal life, which is far from eternal life in a contractual iteration. |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 3604461)
Can somebody explain why LA, with around 1,000 pilots needs Reps who never fly and Atlanta with 4,800 pilots have Reps that do fly?
I was out in LA for lounge week several times. Never once saw anyone at the ALPA table. Not once, middle of the morning or afternoon. An empty chair making half a million a year in pay and benefits. The LA pilots re-elected them. An elected Treasurer isn’t enforcing the rules against those who elected him. ALPA needs a judiciary function. Can somebody explain why some ATL pilots have an odd fixation with the LA reps? |
Originally Posted by Flighton
(Post 3604634)
I’ve been in LA since the current reps were elected. I have rarely heard any negative comments about them from actual LA pilots.
Can somebody explain why some ATL pilots have an odd fixation with the LA reps? |
Originally Posted by Flighton
(Post 3604634)
I’ve been in LA since the current reps were elected. I have rarely heard any negative comments about them from actual LA pilots.
Can somebody explain why some ATL pilots have an odd fixation with the LA reps? |
Originally Posted by MJP27
(Post 3604686)
You're kidding right? The comms out of C16 are embarrassing.
|
I should not have commented on the LA Reps. Their council is decided by LA pilots. I am not an LA Pilot.
The cross council sniping is bad. Sorry I contributed to it. |
Originally Posted by JamesBond
(Post 3604453)
Something greater than the zero we got.
No I get it. But it's a trap question. Because anything I say you are going to turn into a "yeah but we aren't getting that so it's coming out of MY pocket so **** you". Remember this. You didn't lose your retirement either. You are benefitting directly from what was taken from us and the way it was done. And you responded that retirement wasn't important to you because you have your full retirement from Delta. You have never once said a number or percentage that would make you feel like you weren't short-changed. Why don't you try us before assuming we'd immediately say no. With how much you've talked about this you MUST have some kind of number in mind... And saying we got zero is false. It may not be what you wanted or what ALPA's goal was but going to 18% DC is an improvement and is not zero. Yes it is not immediate, but it is happening. |
Originally Posted by BlueSkies
(Post 3604791)
So for the 50th time, what number would satisfy you?
You have never once said a number or percentage that would make you feel like you weren't short-changed. Why don't you try us before assuming we'd immediately say no. With how much you've talked about this you MUST have some kind of number in mind... And saying we got zero is false. It may not be what you wanted or what ALPA's goal was but going to 18% DC is an improvement and is not zero. Yes it is not immediate, but it is happening. He wants an MBCP with a min balance of $300,000 plus the 18% DC. Preferably, he'd like $2 million, because what's what he thinks the company stole from him, and wants the "juniors" as they call everyone on chitchat to pay for it, because "we owe him". Like the rest of the boomers, he's part of the greed, entitlement, and victimization generation. Thanks for coming to my TED talk. |
I would have been happy to get a COLA (same as SS) on the frozen DB.
|
Originally Posted by Tropical
(Post 3604807)
He wants an MBCP with a min balance of $300,000 plus the 18% DC. Anyone know how I can divert my retirement withholdings to his account? In just over four years of transferring my 415c limit into his account he’ll have his 300k and the world will once again be fair. Actually, inflation’s a bi7c4…better make it a full five years of diversion just so I feel better about the arrangement. |
You guys are hilarious. He wants a retirement increase, he never said anyone should pay except DAL. I think someone is whining about fairness if they want something and it doesn't benefit everyone exactly equally. Retirement, commute clause, pay rates, new hire hotels and uniforms (more retirement should have happened way before this one), LCA bump, etc. The pie is only "this big" is a defeatist mind set.
|
Originally Posted by TED74
(Post 3604860)
Well now I feel bad. That’s all he wants from pilots who were playing little league when his employer went bankrupt?
Anyone know how I can divert my retirement withholdings to his account? In just over four years of transferring my 415c limit into his account he’ll have his 300k and the world will once again be fair. Actually, inflation’s a bi7c4…better make it a full five years of diversion just so I feel better about the arrangement. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:42 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands