|
Originally Posted by neodd
(Post 3642576)
Try 665...
*Iron Maiden plays in the background* |
Originally Posted by Meme In Command
(Post 3642613)
ATL 320 FO last I saw was 666
*Iron Maiden plays in the background* |
Originally Posted by NuGuy
(Post 3642270)
You folks do realize that if we had "adequate staffing", there would be a bare fraction of the premium time we have today, if any at all. The senior people in each category would hoover it all up, and everyone else would just be flying their lines. ALVs would be relatively low, the open board and swap board would be empty.
Most on this thread, with the exception of a few, would lose their minds if that were to happen. Maybe we could consider trading future batch sizes for more RCC control over initial bid packages and /or network’s imaginary capabilities. |
what about this..we give them bigger batches and one of us wins a lottery to go over there and smash the optimizer to bits
|
Originally Posted by MrBojangles
(Post 3642660)
what about this..we give them bigger batches and one of us wins a lottery to go over there and smash the optimizer to bits
Part of the blanket gs problem is the company’s blunt approach to initial and broken-up trip construction. Honor more of our inputs and we won’t be forced to ignore 10 gs to discover the ones we’d actually fly. or perhaps: Allow us to ‘tailor a pairing’ before it’s even created and we could be very efficient for the co and also flying desirable trips. I recognize there would be limits to the ‘tailor a pairing’ concept since some legs are simply undesirable but still need to be flown. Maybe the RLL formula could be a starting point. fwiw I like the lottery suggestion better than this one above. |
Are Inverse Assignments sent out in batches or one pilot at a time? I suspect it's the former. Today I received the automated call, hung up, looked at the rotation, and when I had called back (probably 2-3 minutes max) a senior pilot had already received the IA.
I was under the impression it went 1 pilot at a time starting at the bottom. A5S |
Originally Posted by All 5 Stages
(Post 3643101)
Are Inverse Assignments sent out in batches or one pilot at a time? I suspect it's the former. Today I received the automated call, hung up, looked at the rotation, and when I had called back (probably 2-3 minutes max) a senior pilot had already received the IA.
I was under the impression it went 1 pilot at a time starting at the bottom. A5S |
Originally Posted by NuGuy
(Post 3642270)
You folks do realize that if we had "adequate staffing", there would be a bare fraction of the premium time we have today, if any at all. The senior people in each category would hoover it all up, and everyone else would just be flying their lines. ALVs would be relatively low, the open board and swap board would be empty.
Most on this thread, with the exception of a few, would lose their minds if that were to happen. |
Originally Posted by fishforfun
(Post 3643144)
Sounds amazing.
|
Originally Posted by myrkridia
(Post 3643112)
They are done technically one at a time, but it's a computer doing it automatically with fractions of a second apart. So in practice it feels like one big call and the first one to answer gets it.
typo: ^paid…. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:38 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands