Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Stretched A220 News - Calling It The A221 >

Stretched A220 News - Calling It The A221

Search

Notices

Stretched A220 News - Calling It The A221

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-06-2023 | 12:50 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 2,607
Likes: 1
Default

A221 when there already is the A220-100 must be the same marketing geniuses that name the USB 3.0 standards.
Reply
Old 07-06-2023 | 05:16 PM
  #22  
:-)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Tropical
Except that we own our own GTF engine shop, and Pratt pays us to overhaul our own engines, under warrantee.
Yeah, but OEM parts are delayed several months from P&W. All of the engine manufacturers are in crisis.
Reply
Old 07-07-2023 | 11:06 AM
  #23  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 1,189
Likes: 24
Default

Originally Posted by David Puddy
Would love to see a big Delta order when Airbus officially announces the extended A220 - they are calling it the “A221” like the A321. A big aspect will be getting a 2nd engine option beyond P&W like what you see in A320 models. This stretched version with 170 seats has been rumored for awhile but the current P&W and supply-chain issues (leading to slow delivery rates in Mobile) haven’t helped the situation. There have also been A319Neo order cannibalization concerns - but very few have been ordered given the poor economics. Evidently Delta, JB, Air Canada and Air France have expressed interest in a stretched A220 version. Here are two recent articles about it:

Two articles about name change and potential engine option change:

https://www.airlinerwatch.com/2023/07/airbuss-boss-names-extended-a220.html?m=1

https://www.airlinerwatch.com/2023/06/airbus-ceo-hints-at-additional-engine.html?m=1


From the article above it sounds like they are looking at revamping the wing too - so it could be a few years out… Would love to see a big order replacing older A319/A320s (older NW birds) and maybe some of the older 738s. And is it too much to ask for a Delta “A221” base eventually in Atlanta?
The Canibus C Series 221 stretch
Reply
Old 07-07-2023 | 07:34 PM
  #24  
saturn's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 40
From: Supreme Allied Commander
Default

Originally Posted by PilotBases
A221 when there already is the A220-100 must be the same marketing geniuses that name the USB 3.0 standards.
No kidding. It's already short handed to A221 and A223.
Reply
Old 07-08-2023 | 07:26 PM
  #25  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,596
Likes: 112
Default

Originally Posted by David Puddy
Would love to see a big Delta order when Airbus officially announces the extended A220 - they are calling it the “A221” like the A321. A big aspect will be getting a 2nd engine option beyond P&W like what you see in A320 models. This stretched version with 170 seats has been rumored for awhile but the current P&W and supply-chain issues (leading to slow delivery rates in Mobile) haven’t helped the situation. There have also been A319Neo order cannibalization concerns - but very few have been ordered given the poor economics. Evidently Delta, JB, Air Canada and Air France have expressed interest in a stretched A220 version. Here are two recent articles about it:

Two articles about name change and potential engine option change:

https://www.airlinerwatch.com/2023/07/airbuss-boss-names-extended-a220.html?m=1

https://www.airlinerwatch.com/2023/06/airbus-ceo-hints-at-additional-engine.html?m=1


From the article above it sounds like they are looking at revamping the wing too - so it could be a few years out… Would love to see a big order replacing older A319/A320s (older NW birds) and maybe some of the older 738s. And is it too much to ask for a Delta “A221” base eventually in Atlanta?

you just won’t give up your A220 fetish. That article is a little light on details. No way Airbus funds a program like that until the fix the all the problems with the current models. Engine issues, dispatch reliability, manufacturing issues. Until they start making money selling these aircraft they are not going to spend the money on certification for a new one. For those that have been paying attention Airbus is unlikely to make amends with suppliers to reduce costs after they were burned by the Emerites fake order for A380s that was canceled 10 years ago. Suppliers tend not to forget **** like that.

the only reason Delta doesn’t have most of their A220s parked waiting for parts like other airlines is they have their own engine shop able to keep them flying with the engine issues. How long can they keep that up?
Reply
Old 07-08-2023 | 07:55 PM
  #26  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 634
Likes: 63
Default

Originally Posted by PNWFlyer
you just won’t give up your A220 fetish. That article is a little light on details. No way Airbus funds a program like that until the fix the all the problems with the current models. Engine issues, dispatch reliability, manufacturing issues. Until they start making money selling these aircraft they are not going to spend the money on certification for a new one. For those that have been paying attention Airbus is unlikely to make amends with suppliers to reduce costs after they were burned by the Emerites fake order for A380s that was canceled 10 years ago. Suppliers tend not to forget **** like that.

the only reason Delta doesn’t have most of their A220s parked waiting for parts like other airlines is they have their own engine shop able to keep them flying with the engine issues. How long can they keep that up?
Patently false, as the issue is with engine components that we do not manufacture. We (and JetBlue) have the lowest UER rate of 220 operators, and are dealing with the engine quirks in a middling fashion. The operators with the most trouble with them are using them as a RJ replacement. That’s the job for the 737 and 320. The 220 is happiest with long legs.

We’re doing just fine with the fleet, thanks
Reply
Old 07-09-2023 | 05:34 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 2,607
Likes: 1
Default

The 225 or whatever you call it would be a great replacement for the 319s in the later half of the decade. Goes with the current strategy of upgauging (320->Max10) etc. Solid fleet of 60+ of them would take the total family numbers to just shy of 180, assuming no further -300 top ups.
Reply
Old 07-09-2023 | 06:16 AM
  #28  
notEnuf's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,183
Likes: 638
From: ir.delta.com
Default

Originally Posted by Delta757
Legitimate, non-troll question. Why do so many people bash ATL? Compared to the other hubs we have, I'd say ATL is one of the easier ones.
Virginia Ave., reroutes, weather, ATC, sits, plane swaps, gate agents, parking, C44, geography(lack of)
Reply
Old 07-09-2023 | 06:39 AM
  #29  
FangsF15's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,099
Likes: 1,047
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
Virginia Ave., reroutes, weather, ATC, sits, plane swaps, gate agents, parking, C44, geography(lack of)
I’ll give you reroutes, plane swaps (but it’s not like it doesn’t happen per capita more than other hubs), and gate agents.

But the others are just an excuse as a proxy because that’s where the G.O. is, and people hate management.

I mean, come on…. ATL ATC is some of the most proficient in the world. I’ve had sits in every single hub in the system. Parking is horrible everywhere. Lack of Geography? Really?
Reply
Old 07-09-2023 | 07:14 AM
  #30  
CX500T's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
Veteran: Navy
5 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 3,370
Likes: 504
From: NYC 7ERA
Default

Originally Posted by FangsF15
I’ll give you reroutes, plane swaps (but it’s not like it doesn’t happen per capita more than other hubs), and gate agents.

But the others are just an excuse as a proxy because that’s where the G.O. is, and people hate management.

I mean, come on…. ATL ATC is some of the most proficient in the world. I’ve had sits in every single hub in the system. Parking is horrible everywhere. Lack of Geography? Really?
Honestly, lack of geography compared to the real estate market and short call range is what kept us from just sucking it up and moving there when I got hired.

ATL is expensive for what it is, an inland city in driving distance of but not in the mountains. Same goes for MSP actually. DTW has the great lakes right there which is ocean-enough for many.

Back when you could buy a baller house in golf cart land on 2nd year F/O pay without a side gig, familial wealth, working spouse or some other "non Delta source of money" the cost of living vs nice enough and really, REALLY close to work was hard to beat.

I look at the numbers of senior-ish but not crazy area code seniority guys I flew with on the ER, who had a house in PTC, and a lake/beach/mountain house and didn't have a high income spouse or crazy good side gig. Bought it when new-ish hires, and then bought the 2nd home around the time they upgraded.. Most told me they got lucky and bought before ATL went nuts real estate wise for non aviation reasons.

I know anecdotes are not data, but ATL over the last 20 years median home prices have almost tripled.While that's the metro as a whole, and not any specific neighborhood, that took away one of the better reasons to move to ATL, in that you could easily afford a very nice house in a very good school district, without it being a financial stretch on what a 2nd year FO makes. Buying a house in PTC would be doable for me now, and I don't have any really crazy bills anymore as a NB Captain, but forget about it on F/O pay if we have another contraction.

I'd be willing to be somewhat house-poor if I was a few blocks off the beach in SoCal, or had a place where I could go ride my mountain bike out of my yard and ride my dirtbikes without driving hours to get to the closest practice track or state ORV area.

But ATL doesn't have that much in the "it's right here" geography wise (aka it's not ever going to be built) for me to want to pay that premium price.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JNYVEGAS
Cargo
34
01-30-2009 09:21 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices