Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
PB's Letter - DALPA?  Anyone?  Bueller? >

PB's Letter - DALPA? Anyone? Bueller?

Search

Notices

PB's Letter - DALPA? Anyone? Bueller?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-30-2023 | 06:07 AM
  #31  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 916
Likes: 6
Default

Originally Posted by Hotel Kilo
To add, there's more energy directed at Miatas and chickens than something as serious as this. Troubling for sure.
What do you have against chickens?
Reply
Old 11-30-2023 | 06:38 AM
  #32  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 148
Likes: 4
Default

Originally Posted by Hotel Kilo
The synergy between C44 and the 4th floor is highly suspect. I question DH's motives. Where is the action from DALPA??
While I agree, ATL is a little too cozy sometimes, DH is from 20, not 44.
Reply
Old 11-30-2023 | 01:19 PM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 2,287
Likes: 1,180
Default

I’m a firm believer that ALPA bylaws should be rewritten to require that the MEC Chairman be elected by direct membership vote. DH has demonstrated the true unilateral power of the position — not only in terms of setting the tone, but also in terms of informally negotiating with management through the grievance settlement process. The old ALPA argument that the MEC Chairman is nothing more than a figurehead simply falls flat.

There is no chance whatsoever that DH would have been elected by this pilot group.
Reply
Old 11-30-2023 | 01:30 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,523
Likes: 1,114
Default

Originally Posted by ancman
I’m a firm believer that ALPA bylaws should be rewritten to require that the MEC Chairman be elected by direct membership vote. DH has demonstrated the true unilateral power of the position — not only in terms of setting the tone, but also in terms of informally negotiating with management through the grievance settlement process. The old ALPA argument that the MEC Chairman is nothing more than a figurehead simply falls flat.

There is no chance whatsoever that DH would have been elected by this pilot group.
I disagree. His actions were approved of by a majority of ALPA reps. We don't need a MEC chairman acting against the other elected representatives. A more effective change would be to mandate live streaming and electronically archived MEC/LEC meetings so pilots can participate virtually. A 5 paragraph email from some random pilot amongst 16k pilots isn't nearly adequate to elect a "union president." I am much more comfortable with the LEC reps, the ones who deal with the individuals on a frequent basis, determining the suitability of someone to manage a pretty extensive committee structure and budget
Reply
Old 11-30-2023 | 01:37 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 2,607
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by ancman
I’m a firm believer that ALPA bylaws should be rewritten to require that the MEC Chairman be elected by direct membership vote. DH has demonstrated the true unilateral power of the position — not only in terms of setting the tone, but also in terms of informally negotiating with management through the grievance settlement process. The old ALPA argument that the MEC Chairman is nothing more than a figurehead simply falls flat.

There is no chance whatsoever that DH would have been elected by this pilot group.
That hasn’t worked for APA.
Reply
Old 11-30-2023 | 01:53 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 2,287
Likes: 1,180
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy
I am much more comfortable with the LEC reps, the ones who deal with the individuals on a frequent basis, determining the suitability of someone to manage a pretty extensive committee structure and budget
I’m not. It promotes the culture of cronyism that has led to the type of ineffective leadership we see today. I would much rather see an outsider with broad pilot group support work his/her way in, over another insider who becomes chairman simply by having the right friends among a very small group of people.

DH was one of the least-favored candidates across the overall pilot group when the MEC elected him. There is something fundamentally wrong with that.
Reply
Old 11-30-2023 | 02:18 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 2,607
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by ancman
I’m not. It promotes the culture of cronyism that has led to the type of ineffective leadership we see today. I would much rather see an outsider with broad pilot group support work his/her way in, over another insider who becomes chairman simply by having the right friends among a very small group of people.

DH was one of the least-favored candidates across the overall pilot group when the MEC elected him. There is something fundamentally wrong with that.
right, the guy who voted against the popular 20-04, and against the contract that was voted for overwhelmingly is the guy with his finger on the pulse of the pilots.
Reply
Old 11-30-2023 | 02:39 PM
  #38  
Valar Morghulis's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 480
Likes: 66
Default

Originally Posted by ancman
DH was one of the least-favored candidates across the angry internet forums I regularly frequent when the MEC elected him.
FIFY…filler
Reply
Old 11-30-2023 | 02:48 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 2,287
Likes: 1,180
Default

Originally Posted by PilotBases
That hasn’t worked for APA.
Out of all of the issues that APA has, this isn’t one of them.

Originally Posted by PilotBases
right, the guy who voted against the popular 20-04, and against the contract that was voted for overwhelmingly is the guy with his finger on the pulse of the pilots.
What does that have to do with anything? I voted the way that I did based on personal convictions, as did everyone else here. Nobody casts a vote based on which way they believe the rest of the pilot group is going to vote. I knew that both would pass.

If your belief is that the pilot group would elect DH, then why be fearful of sending the chair position to a membership-wide vote?
Reply
Old 11-30-2023 | 02:52 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,523
Likes: 1,114
Default

Originally Posted by ancman
I’m not. It promotes the culture of cronyism that has led to the type of ineffective leadership we see today. I would much rather see an outsider with broad pilot group support work his/her way in, over another insider who becomes chairman simply by having the right friends among a very small group of people.

DH was one of the least-favored candidates across the overall pilot group when the MEC elected him. There is something fundamentally wrong with that.
A unitary executive is accountable to no one. What's the point of even having a LEC at that point?

DH was one of the least favored candidates? Maybe. But we found out how petty and immature his only real competition was. The epic tantrum he threw when he didn't win was absolutely embarrassing. Maybe the majority saw his behavior and didn't want a loose cannon behind the wheel?

The MEC chairman is still accountable to the LECs and, believe it or not, is still accountable to the pilots. There have been successful recall efforts in the past and unsuccessful, yet very well attended recall meetings. The MEC could then recall and oust anyone they please. Or, in the case of RS, not be reelected..
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201736
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
flightmedic01
United
31
09-20-2014 07:19 AM
YourFnout
American
29
11-14-2013 08:26 AM
bigtime209
PSA Airlines
205
09-30-2013 11:45 AM
winglet
Mesa Airlines
75
12-24-2009 03:46 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices