Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
PB's Letter - DALPA?  Anyone?  Bueller? >

PB's Letter - DALPA? Anyone? Bueller?

Search

Notices

PB's Letter - DALPA? Anyone? Bueller?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-30-2023 | 02:58 PM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,523
Likes: 1,114
Default

Originally Posted by ancman
Out of all of the issues that APA has, this isn’t one of them.



What does that have to do with anything? I voted the way that I did based on personal convictions, as did everyone else here. Nobody casts a vote based on which way they believe the rest of the pilot group is going to vote. I knew that both would pass.

If your belief is that the pilot group would elect DH, then why be fearful of sending the chair position to a membership-wide vote?
I'm not "afraid" of a membership vote. It's just a dumb proposition with how we currently do union business. Our LECs run the show. They set policy. They vote to approve certain chair positions. They vote for contractual LOAs or TAs. They set the negotiating priorities. The MEC Chairman works directly for the majority of them.

In the current way we do business, we would have to choose between 2 or more random pilots no one has heard of and decide based solely on high school class president quality campaign letters. I promise free food in the crew lounge and hotel points! If that person wins, the LEC has no power to speak for the will of their constituents. 0-9? Too bad..the pilots elected Captain free stuff for everyone.

​​​​​​
Reply
Old 11-30-2023 | 03:02 PM
  #42  
notEnuf's Avatar
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,327
Likes: 818
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by Hotel Kilo
So you guys are fine with not getting paid, violations of the PWA (PS after reroute, scope etc) and a union basically sitting back and letting it happen? Our MEC Chair gave away something we spent negotiationg capital on - for nothing in return!

I called my captain rep. What I heard is basically DALPA is going to do F-all of nothing. Really. That's what our 15 minute convo boiled down to. I was speechless at the end. The apathy I see is troubling. Its like almost overnight the collective pilot group is aflicted with Stockholm Syndrome. What is the answer, collectively to the open hostitlity being demonstrated on multiple levels from our management? Sit back, wait?
There are no pilots (true line pilots) in any management positions. We are a ledger item... full stop.
Reply
Old 11-30-2023 | 03:23 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 2,287
Likes: 1,180
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy
I'm not "afraid" of a membership vote. It's just a dumb proposition with how we currently do union business. Our LECs run the show. They set policy. They vote to approve certain chair positions. They vote for contractual LOAs or TAs. They set the negotiating priorities. The MEC Chairman works directly for the majority of them.

In the current way we do business, we would have to choose between 2 or more random pilots no one has heard of and decide based solely on high school class president quality campaign letters. I promise free food in the crew lounge and hotel points! If that person wins, the LEC has no power to speak for the will of their constituents. 0-9? Too bad..the pilots elected Captain free stuff for everyone.
​​​​​​
In other words, the same way we currently choose LEC leaders. And as your first paragraph states, the LECs are supposed to be running the show regardless.

I’m more interested in the voices of the pilot group as a whole being heard than I am the voices of the few select pilots who are on the MEC — many of whom are only concerned about their ALPA careers. There are too many potential conflicts of interest and ways to manipulate a group that small. The potential risks to having a much larger electorate are significantly less IMHO.

The current situation demonstrates the need for greater checks and balances on the MEC.
Reply
Old 11-30-2023 | 03:32 PM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,523
Likes: 1,114
Default

Originally Posted by ancman
In other words, the same way we currently choose LEC leaders. And as your first paragraph states, the LECs are supposed to be running the show regardless.

I’m more interested in the voices of the pilot group as a whole being heard than I am the voices of the few select pilots who are on the MEC — many of whom are only concerned about their ALPA careers. There are too many potential conflicts of interest and ways to manipulate a group that small. The potential risks to having a much larger electorate are significantly less IMHO.

The current situation demonstrates the need for greater checks and balances on the MEC.
I've already said I don't like our current system but at least you're more likely to encounter and talk to one of the reps in your base. I haven't seen or talked to anyone from Seattle in months.

I won't support a change in MEC elections until we make more meaningful changes to how our union does business. Otherwise, it's too easy for fringe demographics to spin the narrative in their favor.
Reply
Old 11-30-2023 | 03:44 PM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 2,287
Likes: 1,180
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy
I've already said I don't like our current system but at least you're more likely to encounter and talk to one of the reps in your base. I haven't seen or talked to anyone from Seattle in months.

I won't support a change in MEC elections until we make more meaningful changes to how our union does business. Otherwise, it's too easy for fringe demographics to spin the narrative in their favor.
Improvements are needed. DALPA has expanded the use of MEMRAT over the years, which is a step in the right direction. Both the MEC Chairman and ALPA President are the last sticking points, due to the sheer level of politics and cronyism involved.
Reply
Old 11-30-2023 | 03:47 PM
  #46  
Valar Morghulis's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 480
Likes: 66
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy
I've already said I don't like our current system but at least you're more likely to encounter and talk to one of the reps in your base. I haven't seen or talked to anyone from Seattle in months.

I won't support a change in MEC elections until we make more meaningful changes to how our union does business. Otherwise, it's too easy for fringe demographics to spin the narrative in their favor.
I wouldn’t worry about that too much. The way officers are elected is set by National bylaws. The only way to change that would be amend the bylaws, which would take a 2/3s vote of the BOD. The BOD is made up of your local reps.

Most of them do pay attention, and after watching the trainwreck at APA, are probably not interested in that kind of governance.
Reply
Old 11-30-2023 | 03:51 PM
  #47  
Valar Morghulis's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 480
Likes: 66
Default

Originally Posted by ancman
Improvements are needed. DALPA has expanded the use of MEMRAT over the years, which is a step in the right direction. Both the MEC Chairman and ALPA President are the last sticking points, due to the sheer level of politics and cronyism involved.
And somehow, an unknown candidate with only a single 2 year term as MEC chairman defeated the assumed heir apparent from UAL in the most lopsided election in ALPA history.

You clearly weren’t here pre-2015, because then you’d know what top down MEC governance really looks like.
Reply
Old 11-30-2023 | 04:03 PM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 2,287
Likes: 1,180
Default

Originally Posted by Valar Morghulis
And somehow, an unknown candidate with only a single 2 year term as MEC chairman defeated the assumed heir apparent from UAL in the most lopsided election in ALPA history.

You clearly weren’t here pre-2015, because then you’d know what top down MEC governance really looks like.
Take away the negotiating environment we were in, along with the progress we were making relative to our peers, and we’d all be reading monthly editorials from the heir apparent right now.

I was around pre-2015. Suffice it to say, Moak is the worst product of ALPA’s flawed election bylaws.
Reply
Old 11-30-2023 | 04:09 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,146
Likes: 112
Default

Originally Posted by ancman
I’m not. It promotes the culture of cronyism that has led to the type of ineffective leadership we see today.
Can you point to an effective leadership model in modern democracies that is insulated from cronyism? What might you propose we try to emulate?
Reply
Old 11-30-2023 | 04:21 PM
  #50  
Can’t find crew pickup
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,058
Likes: 200
Default

Originally Posted by Valar Morghulis
And somehow, an unknown candidate with only a single 2 year term as MEC chairman defeated the assumed heir apparent from UAL in the most lopsided election in ALPA history.

You clearly weren’t here pre-2015, because then you’d know what top down MEC governance really looks like.
UAL had already turned on TI, if that’s who you are referring to. The UAL TA was a disaster, and he lost the support of his own pilot group.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201736
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
flightmedic01
United
31
09-20-2014 07:19 AM
YourFnout
American
29
11-14-2013 08:26 AM
bigtime209
PSA Airlines
205
09-30-2013 11:45 AM
winglet
Mesa Airlines
75
12-24-2009 03:46 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices