December Quarter and Full Year 2023 webcast
#21
ICN - JFK/LAX/SLC/BOS
AMS - LAX/JFK+1/ATL+1/DTW+1
CDG - ATL+1/DTW+1/BOS+1/RDU/MCO/TPA
PKX - LAX/ATL/DTW
PVG - ATL/DTW/MSP/JFK
Could be a full daily add or even just bumping up a weekly by 3x. Pretty sexy list eh? That alone is a lot of jets.
Even more aggressive:
LAX-MEL
SIN - LAX or SEA
MNL-LAX or SEA
HKG - LAX or SEA
KIX - DTW (resume)
BOS - FRA/MAD/MXP
JFK - BOM/DEL/NBO
Partner with Etihad
AUH - ATL/JFK
MIA- BSB [Brasilia], FOR [Fortaleza], REC [Recife], MAO [Manaus] 😜 JK thats on LATAM NBs.
We also just partnered with Scandinavian a few months ago. Many seem to forget. Could see some additional flights to Copenhagen/Oslo/Stockholm.
https://thepointsguy.com/news/scandinavian-airlines-sas-skyteam-timing-ceo-interview/
Point is, we could find a home for lots of jets. If economy tanks, we retire old jets & defer orders like UA does on their 350s or we did with our 787s.
Last edited by saturn; 12-31-2023 at 07:34 AM.
#23
Most long-haul routes (ex: south pacific) require 2 350s to open 1 route. And you need a spare at some ratio as well. But here are a few I could forsee over the next 5 years:
ICN - JFK/LAX/SLC/BOS
AMS - LAX/JFK+1/ATL+1/DTW+1
CDG - ATL+1/DTW+1/BOS+1/RDU/MCO/TPA
PKX - LAX/ATL/DTW
PVG - ATL/DTW/MSP/JFK
Could be a full daily add or even just bumping up a weekly by 3x. Pretty sexy list eh? That alone is a lot of jets.
Even more aggressive:
LAX-MEL
SIN - LAX or SEA
MNL-LAX or SEA
HKG - LAX or SEA
KIX - DTW (resume)
BOS - FRA/MAD/MXP
JFK - BOM/DEL/NBO
Partner with Etihad
AUH - ATL/JFK
MIA- BSB [Brasilia], FOR [Fortaleza], REC [Recife], MAO [Manaus] 😜 JK thats on LATAM NBs.
We also just partnered with Scandinavian a few months ago. Many seem to forget. Could see some additional flights to Copenhagen/Oslo/Stockholm.
https://thepointsguy.com/news/scandinavian-airlines-sas-skyteam-timing-ceo-interview/
Point is, we could find a home for lots of jets. If economy tanks, we retire old jets & defer orders like UA does on their 350s or we did with our 787s.
ICN - JFK/LAX/SLC/BOS
AMS - LAX/JFK+1/ATL+1/DTW+1
CDG - ATL+1/DTW+1/BOS+1/RDU/MCO/TPA
PKX - LAX/ATL/DTW
PVG - ATL/DTW/MSP/JFK
Could be a full daily add or even just bumping up a weekly by 3x. Pretty sexy list eh? That alone is a lot of jets.
Even more aggressive:
LAX-MEL
SIN - LAX or SEA
MNL-LAX or SEA
HKG - LAX or SEA
KIX - DTW (resume)
BOS - FRA/MAD/MXP
JFK - BOM/DEL/NBO
Partner with Etihad
AUH - ATL/JFK
MIA- BSB [Brasilia], FOR [Fortaleza], REC [Recife], MAO [Manaus] 😜 JK thats on LATAM NBs.
We also just partnered with Scandinavian a few months ago. Many seem to forget. Could see some additional flights to Copenhagen/Oslo/Stockholm.
https://thepointsguy.com/news/scandinavian-airlines-sas-skyteam-timing-ceo-interview/
Point is, we could find a home for lots of jets. If economy tanks, we retire old jets & defer orders like UA does on their 350s or we did with our 787s.
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2022
Posts: 405
Interesting list. I think if we had, say United's network planners these would probably all be in play. And before someone jumps in, NO I don't want to fly for United but I just don't see our network people being this aggressive. I think a lot of these routes make sense, though I dont think they all require a 350. Parternering with Etihad is an interesting concept that I, too wonder if the company has considered. The whole war against the ME3 was spearheaded by RA and in my opinion much ado about nothing. UA and AA have linked with EK and QR and Etihad seems like the most rational of the 3. I think you could add DTW-AUH to your list as well but any or all 3 would probably do well with connections. I would just want US doing that flying.
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,236
And that's what it is....."a glance" at our age route structure. Reality is different, our Asia loads suck, I know, I fly those routes. And as far as Australia/NZ goes we have a ton of competition there. I would not be surprised if NZ fails as did Tahiti. South America is generally low yield as is India. And as being far ahead, I get your point that we are not, but my point is these will be replacement aircraft. 763's will be replaced by 330s. Some existing 330 routes will shift to 350. And they won't be coming any time soon. I don't see much growth potential internationally. My comment about being Europe sewn up wasn't the fact that we are the biggest it's just that our route structure is fully fleshed out. That would be a better way of putting it. If we expand internationally, what specific cities would we target?
#26
Both Emirates and Etihad fly to TLV themselves. Our codeshare with El Al is just on flights between TLV and the US which is mostly local traffic.
#28
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Position: Looking left
Posts: 3,251
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post