Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Who Are These Kooks? Is This For Real? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/145882-who-these-kooks-real.html)

CaptKochblauch 01-11-2024 06:20 AM

Who Are These Kooks? Is This For Real?
 
Someone sent this letter to me, which apparently the old guys are attempting to circulate in Washington. I recognize some names on here, including guys who have been retired for years and years...and have zero skin in the game. And a couple of current reps.

Their point so abysmally argued, that I have doubts about its legitimacy.

The premise of this letter seems to be "our careers did not meet our expectations, so we deserve more time! Waaaaa!" Typical of that generation. I'm sure fiftysome washed up ALPA "has-beens" "wannabees" and "never-weres" will move the needle./s

This is my favorite line: "As a pilot moves up in seniority, so does their position on the flight deck, with commensurate pay and benefits."

Translation: "We want to move the goalposts and give ourselves two more years at the highest seniority we will ever hold."

I love how they all attached their titles, as if anyone in Congress knows or cares what they mean.

A real union would kick these clowns out PDQ.

I highlighted the two current reps who signed in case anyone in Captain Forbes's or Captains Johnson's councils wants to have a talk with them.


Dear Honorable Members of the US Congress: January 9, 2024

We the undersigned, current and former Airline Pilot Association (ALPA) Elected Representatives, Committee Chairs, and Committee Members support legislation to raise the pilot statutory retirement age from 65 to 67. This measure is part of the FAA Reauthorization Bill passed in the U.S. House of Representatives by an overwhelming bipartisan majority in July 2023.

ALPA’s position to maintain age 65 is flawed and does not represent its entire membership. It is based solely on the earnings aspirations of younger and less experienced members who are eager to replace highly experienced pilots forced to retire at age 65. Their motivation is driven exclusively by the industry’s seniority system. As a pilot moves up in seniority, so does their position on the flight deck, with commensurate pay and benefits.

ALPA’s position ignores the perspective of the highly experienced pilots who are qualified and capable of continuing to work until age 67. Many of us flew through the turbulence of 9/11, company bankruptcies, loss of pensions, massive pay cuts, a global economic downturn, and COVID. Now that we are at the peak of our profession, we are being forced out by an arbitrary age because of an outdated law.

Today the industry is growing at an unprecedented rate. Entry to, and upgrades within, the industry are happening at an alarming pace. Forced retirements of our most experienced pilots are adding to the problem as tens of millions of hours of experience is being forced out of our flight decks. Staffing issues are causing delays, cancellations, stranded passengers, disrupted cargo flow, and the loss of air service in small towns.

Raising the age from 65 to 67 will provide immediate relief to each of these issues. Additionally, keeping highly experienced pilots on the flight deck longer will help reduce the record number of safety incidents occurring, and provide vital mentorship to the less experienced pilots.

Each of us volunteered to lead in our union. Some of us were elected Local Executive Council representatives. Some of us were elected to Master Executive Council positions, and some to represent ALPA internationally, at ICAO. All of us are ALPA safety advocates and served our union with the expectation that our union would act in our best interest as stated in the ALPA mission statement and Code of Ethics. That is not the case on this issue. Instead, our union is lobbying against us.

We call for Congress to promptly raise the retirement age to 67 and for all associated agencies to implement this change immediately.

Captain Brett Amelung
Former Master Executive Council Committee Vice Chairman

Captain Jeff Anderson
Master Executive Council
Former Government Affairs Committee Chairman

Captain Pete Arnolds
Master Executive Council Committee

Captain Allen Baker
Former Master Executive Council Committee Member

Captain Michael Desantis
Former Local Executive Council Representative

Captain Ed Folsom
Former ALPA National Committee Chairman

Captain David A. Forbes
Local Executive Council Chairman

Captain Joe Furia
Master Executive Council Committee

Captain Armando Gomez
Former Local Executive Council Representative

Captain Michael S. Poggi
Former Local Executive Council Chairman

Captain Dan Riesgo
Former Local Executive Council Vice Chairman

Captain Kingsley S. Roberts
Former Master Executive Council Chairman

Captain Pam Ruegger
Former Local Executive Council Committee

Captain Jefferey Barath
Former Master Executive Council Vice Chairman

Captain Jayson Baron
Former Local Executive Council Representative

Captain Lin Boswell
Former Local Executive Council Representative

Captain William J. Botella
Former Master Executive Council Committee

Captain Eric Brown
Former Local Executive Council Committee

Captain Dave Chapman
Former Local Executive Council Committee Chairman

Captain Dev Colin
Former Local Executive Council Representative

Captain Lorrie Cuneen
Former Master Executive Council Committee

Captain Jim Dearien
Former Master Executive Council Officer

Captain Joe Diamond
Former Local Executive Council Committee

Captain David W. Dodge
Former Local Executive Council Committee Vice Chairman

Captain James Eberly
Former Local Executive Council Representative

Captain Bo Ellis
Former Master Executive Council Committee

Captain Christina Halli
Former Master Executive Council Committee Chairwoman

Captain Dennis Henderson
Former Local Executive Council Committee

Captain Steve Johnson
Local Executive Council Vice Chairman


First Officer Doug Keehn
Former Local Executive Council Representative

Captain Thomas Kramer
Former Local Executive Council Chairman

Captain Garry Kravit
Former Master Executive Council Vice Chairman

Captain Jon J. Lewis
Former Local Executive Council Chairman

Captain Mario Lopes
Former Local Executive Council Representative

Captain Bryan Mcclintock
Former Master Executive Council Committee

Captain Curt McIntyre
Former Master Executive Council Committee

Captain Gary Moore
Master Executive Council Committee

Captain Rick Muir
Former ALPA National Committee

Captain Michael Overbeek
Former Local Executive Council Committee Chairman

Captain Dan Petrovich
Former Master Executive Council Committee Chairman

Captain Carlos Rodriguez
Former ALPA National International Affairs, IFALPA Regional VP

Captain Jon Russell
Former ALPA Regional Safety Director

Captain Bill Sawtelle
Former Master Executive Council Committee Chairman

Captain Keith Shewbart
Former Master Executive Council Committee Chairman

Captain Luis Serrato
Former Local Executive Council Representative

Captain Ryan Schnitzler
Former Master Executive Council Chairman

Captain Brian Skanron
Former Local Executive Council Committee Chairman

Captain Robert Stumpf
Former Master Executive Council Officer

Captain David Talaber
Former Local Executive Council Chairman

Captain Burton Tarvin
Former Master Executive Council Committee Member

Captain Robin W. Thompson
Former Master Executive Council Committee Chairman

Captain Gary Towers
Former Master Executive Council Committee

Captain Thomas R. Tucker
Former Local Executive Council Chairman

Captain Tom Walsh
Former ALPA National Committee Chairman

Captain Adam Zeret
Former Master Executive Committee Chairman

LAXtoDEN 01-11-2024 06:34 AM

Scumbags. Time to take out the trash.

notEnuf 01-11-2024 06:37 AM

Wow, there are quite a few names on there that I didn't think would be. Most of those guys are WB As, and went through the bankruptcies. And were then responsible for ALPA leadership in the ensuing contracts that failed to get them a retirement benefit to thier liking. So the motivation makes sense. Last gasp desperate attempt.

Gunfighter 01-11-2024 06:41 AM


Originally Posted by CaptKochblauch (Post 3749458)
Someone sent this letter to me, .

Have you verified the authenticity of the letter with the highlighted names?

CBreezy 01-11-2024 06:45 AM

A lot of former nobodies and retired pilots on that list. Definitely some pandering by an old MEC Chairman here was the panderer in chief and got us into this retirement restoration debacle in the first place by claiming we could raise DC to 25%. Dollar signs can do a lot to cloud a soon to be retired guy's vision. Many of them, I'm sure, were opposed to 65.

m3113n1a1 01-11-2024 06:54 AM

I thought Steve Johnson lost his election? Or is that not a DL Steve Johnson.

PilotBases 01-11-2024 06:57 AM


Originally Posted by m3113n1a1 (Post 3749479)
I thought Steve Johnson lost his election? Or is that not a DL Steve Johnson.

In office until March.

Most are a list of has beens who now have an axe to grind.

FangsF15 01-11-2024 07:15 AM


... based solely on the earnings aspirations of younger and less experienced members ... Now that we are at the peak of our profession,
They said the quiet part out loud. What supreme hypocisy and irony to lambast "junior" for "earnings asipirations" while at "the peak of [thier] profession".


... Staffing issues are causing delays, cancellations, stranded passengers, ... Raising the age from 65 to 67 will provide immediate relief to each of these issues. Additionally, keeping highly experienced pilots on the flight deck longer will help reduce the record number of safety incidents occurring, and provide vital mentorship to the less experienced pilots.
LOL.

PilotBases 01-11-2024 07:20 AM

So with every airline reducing hiring demands, how does that fly with the need to extend the age?

tcco94 01-11-2024 07:20 AM

How much longer is this saga going to go on

notEnuf 01-11-2024 07:21 AM


Originally Posted by FangsF15 (Post 3749494)
They said the quiet part out loud. What supreme hypocisy and irony to lambast "junior" for "earnings asipirations" while at "the peak of [thier] profession".



LOL.

How much danger were we in when people were forced to retire at 60? I had no idea the peril.

FangsF15 01-11-2024 07:21 AM


Originally Posted by tcco94 (Post 3749498)
How much longer is this saga going to go on

Until the 5-year FAA reauthorization bill is passed...

FangsF15 01-11-2024 07:23 AM


Originally Posted by notEnuf (Post 3749502)
How much danger were we in when people were forced to retire at 60? I had no idea the peril.

https://img.gifglobe.com/grabs/monty...cjxQdrPPms.gif

notEnuf 01-11-2024 07:29 AM

I think they should have unbound opportuities at flight schools and as instructors where thier experience and mentorship can be best utilized. Regional airline training departments seems the most logical.

OOfff 01-11-2024 07:34 AM


Originally Posted by PilotBases (Post 3749482)
In office until March.

Most are a list of has beens who now have an axe to grind.

March cannot come quickly enough.

sailingfun 01-11-2024 08:00 AM


Originally Posted by CBreezy (Post 3749474)
A lot of former nobodies and retired pilots on that list. Definitely some pandering by an old MEC Chairman here was the panderer in chief and got us into this retirement restoration debacle in the first place by claiming we could raise DC to 25%. Dollar signs can do a lot to cloud a soon to be retired guy's vision. Many of them, I'm sure, were opposed to 65.

I don't favor 67. I think 65 was the sweet spot between being fair and a decline in ability to multitask and handle complex situations. What I do find odd however is the current group of pilots screaming about the loss of what would probably be a year to 14 months of career advancement. I find it odd because pilots hired post 2007 have seen a unheard of level of advancement. They will also enjoy a retirement probably triple pilots who have retired in the last 5 years.

Gspeed 01-11-2024 08:03 AM

Cape Air is hiring.

CBreezy 01-11-2024 08:09 AM


Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 3749530)
I don't favor 67. I think 65 was the sweet spot between being fair and a decline in ability to multitask and handle complex situations. What I do find odd however is the current group of pilots screaming about the loss of what would probably be a year to 14 months of career advancement. I find it odd because pilots hired post 2007 have seen a unheard of level of advancement. They will also enjoy a retirement probably triple pilots who have retired in the last 5 years.

I'm opposed to the money grab. The guys lobbying hardest, most of whom were hired in their mid-to-late 20s, are jealous of those hired in the last few years, that anyone else is going to have it as good or better than they had it. They see how good the newest generation of pilots MIGHT have it (might because we are one tech advance or one recession away from chaos) and are trying to skim some cheese off the top of their good fortune. "Hey, you guys are going to have it so good. How about you give me a little something something for my trouble." No. Pull yourself up by your bootstraps and sail off into the setting sun. We are all down here trying to learn from your mistakes (poor planning in retirement and in relationships and family planning) and saving as much as we can before the 2nd shoe drops...which is imminent.

172skychicken 01-11-2024 08:10 AM


Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 3749530)
I don't favor 67. I think 65 was the sweet spot between being fair and a decline in ability to multitask and handle complex situations. What I do find odd however is the current group of pilots screaming about the loss of what would probably be a year to 14 months of career advancement. I find it odd because pilots hired post 2007 have seen a unheard of level of advancement. They will also enjoy a retirement probably triple pilots who have retired in the last 5 years.

No more rediculous than those that have been haranguing anyone who will listen about how they "earned" their position and the right to stay in it as long as they like. While of course completely ignoring the mandatory retirements that got them there in the first place. It's brought out ugliness on both sides of the issue.

notEnuf 01-11-2024 08:14 AM


Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 3749530)
I don't favor 67. I think 65 was the sweet spot between being fair and a decline in ability to multitask and handle complex situations. What I do find odd however is the current group of pilots screaming about the loss of what would probably be a year to 14 months of career advancement. I find it odd because pilots hired post 2007 have seen a unheard of level of advancement. They will also enjoy a retirement probably triple pilots who have retired in the last 5 years.

That's interesting, I personally know a pilot who spent 8 years in the right seat of an MD-88 and upgraded at 13 years. That was after spending a decade at a regional and time at an LCC. So 24 years into an airline career they grabbed the brass ring of the NB A and will be there for the remainder. And never had a pension or PBGC entitlement BTW

sailingfun 01-11-2024 08:21 AM


Originally Posted by notEnuf (Post 3749544)
That's interesting, I personally know a pilot who spent 8 years in the right seat of an MD-88 and upgraded at 13 years. That was after spending a decade at a regional and time at an LCC. So 24 years into an airline career they grabbed the brass ring of the NB A and will be there for the remainder. And never had a pension or PBGC entitlement BTW

He did that by choice. He also had a B plan that is turning into pure gold. My son gets more in his B plan per month in year two than I made total in year 4.

notEnuf 01-11-2024 08:24 AM


Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 3749547)
He did that by choice. He also had a B plan that is turning into pure gold. My son gets more in his B plan per month in year two than I made total in year 4.

By choice you say. Not correct. How much did you make in year 4 and what year was that?

Nantonaku 01-11-2024 08:27 AM


Originally Posted by notEnuf (Post 3749544)
That's interesting, I personally know a pilot who spent 8 years in the right seat of an MD-88 and upgraded at 13 years. That was after spending a decade at a regional and time at an LCC. So 24 years into an airline career they grabbed the brass ring of the NB A and will be there for the remainder. And never had a pension or PBGC entitlement BTW

Two furlough letters and over 12 years to make 6 digits. Five years making under $30k. Worked two jobs for ten years to pay the bills. I don’t call that an unheard level of advancement. How much more out of touch can he get?

CBreezy 01-11-2024 08:31 AM


Originally Posted by Nantonaku (Post 3749552)
Two furlough letters and over 12 years to make 6 digits. Five years making under $30k. Worked two jobs for ten years to pay the bills. I don’t call that an unheard level of advancement. How much more out of touch can he get?

Just curious. Do you not know how much pilots made at the regionals in the 2000s? Speaking of out of touch

Nantonaku 01-11-2024 08:35 AM


Originally Posted by CBreezy (Post 3749556)
Just curious. Do you not know how much pilots made at the regionals in the 2000s? Speaking of out of touch

What is your point? Of course I did, he said people hired after 2007 have had an unheard level of advancement. Most people didn’t have any advancement for 10 years. As usual you chime in on something and add nothing to the discussion.

Wolf424 01-11-2024 08:35 AM

I wonder how many of them would support 67 if it went into effect with 5 year implementation schedule?

I mean, it’s all about safety and mentoring right?

CBreezy 01-11-2024 08:44 AM


Originally Posted by Nantonaku (Post 3749560)
What is your point? Of course I did, he said people hired after 2007 have had an unheard level of advancement. Most people didn’t have any advancement for 10 years. As usual you chime in on something and add nothing to the discussion.

You're trying to gain sympathy about how little you made from a group of people who made 1/4 of what you made while you're saying you were poor. You had far better fortune than many of them yet here you are saying those same people should feel fortunate.

Vsop 01-11-2024 08:44 AM


Originally Posted by Wolf424 (Post 3749561)
I wonder how many of them would support 67 if it went into effect with 5 year implementation schedule?

I mean, it’s all about safety and mentoring right?

Yep. Sadly, I’ve baby sat, I mean mentored, a name on that list.

tennisguru 01-11-2024 08:44 AM

I just have to say, Cooks ≠ Kooks…

Nantonaku 01-11-2024 08:58 AM


Originally Posted by CBreezy (Post 3749569)
You're trying to gain sympathy about how little you made from a group of people who made 1/4 of what you made while you're saying you were poor. You had far better fortune than many of them yet here you are saying those same people should feel fortunate.

Okay, sure, you are right and I’m wrong. You are right about everything on here. You have never been wrong about anything. You should take all your wisdom
you write on this forum and write a book. God knows it would be a way better use of your time.

OOfff 01-11-2024 09:00 AM


Originally Posted by Nantonaku (Post 3749574)
Okay, sure, you are right and I’m wrong. You are right about everything on here. You have never been wrong about anything. You should take all your wisdom
you write on this forum and write a book. God knows it would be a way better use of your time.

this is a reasonable response to someone disagreeing with you.

notEnuf 01-11-2024 09:27 AM

He was off by about a decade. 2017 instead of 2007. An argument could be made for 2014, maybe. A one off super junior NYC NB A award in 2012 is not opportunity for all.

Chico 01-11-2024 09:49 AM

[QUOTE=CaptKochblauch;3749458]Someone sent this letter to me, which apparently the old guys are attempting to circulate in Washington. I recognize some names on here, including guys who have been retired for years and years...and have zero skin in the game. And a couple of current reps.

Their point so abysmally argued, that I have doubts about its legitimacy.

The premise of this letter seems to be "our careers did not meet our expectations, so we deserve more time! Waaaaa!" Typical of that generation. I'm sure fiftysome washed up ALPA "has-beens" "wannabees" and "never-weres" will move the needle./s

This is my favorite line: "As a pilot moves up in seniority, so does their position on the flight deck, with commensurate pay and benefits."

Translation: "We want to move the goalposts and give ourselves two more years at the highest seniority we will ever hold."





My friend's dad had a horrible career with non-skeds, finally got on at a legacy at 60 years old. He definitely wants another 2 years, there are a lot more of these type of situations then you might think.

CBreezy 01-11-2024 09:49 AM


Originally Posted by Nantonaku (Post 3749574)
Okay, sure, you are right and I’m wrong. You are right about everything on here. You have never been wrong about anything. You should take all your wisdom
you write on this forum and write a book. God knows it would be a way better use of your time.

Thank you for acknowledging my superiority. I've been waiting my whole life for your validation.

And I am going to write a book on a study from here. It's called Ad Hominem: How the rate of usage of the logical fallacy is directly proportional how often a person grossly wrong about a subject. I've also started a new study looking at the reasons why people lash out instead of acknowledging that their logic might be full of holes.

Thruster 01-11-2024 09:57 AM


Originally Posted by CaptKochblauch (Post 3749458)
Someone sent this letter to me, which apparently the old guys are attempting to circulate in Washington. I recognize some names on here, including guys who have been retired for years and years...and have zero skin in the game. And a couple of current reps.

Their point so abysmally argued, that I have doubts about its legitimacy.

The premise of this letter seems to be "our careers did not meet our expectations, so we deserve more time! Waaaaa!" Typical of that generation. I'm sure fiftysome washed up ALPA "has-beens" "wannabees" and "never-weres" will move the needle./s

This is my favorite line: "As a pilot moves up in seniority, so does their position on the flight deck, with commensurate pay and benefits."

Translation: "We want to move the goalposts and give ourselves two more years at the highest seniority we will ever hold."

I love how they all attached their titles, as if anyone in Congress knows or cares what they mean.

A real union would kick these clowns out PDQ.

I highlighted the two current reps who signed in case anyone in Captain Forbes's or Captains Johnson's councils wants to have a talk with them.

They call themselves...wait for it..."The Stakeholders".

m3113n1a1 01-11-2024 09:57 AM


Originally Posted by OOfff (Post 3749509)
March cannot come quickly enough.

Can we get him removed sooner? Going against ALPA and against the pilot group while still holding elected office seems pretty egregious.

OOfff 01-11-2024 09:59 AM


Originally Posted by m3113n1a1 (Post 3749607)
Can we get him removed sooner? Going against ALPA and against the pilot group while still holding elected office seems pretty egregious.

egregious behavior is SOP for some

PilotBases 01-11-2024 10:05 AM


Originally Posted by m3113n1a1 (Post 3749607)
Can we get him removed sooner? Going against ALPA and against the pilot group while still holding elected office seems pretty egregious.

One of those names was just re-elected.

Pilot4000 01-11-2024 10:14 AM

Too many cooks in the kitchen

sailingfun 01-11-2024 10:24 AM


Originally Posted by notEnuf (Post 3749548)
By choice you say. Not correct. How much did you make in year 4 and what year was that?

About 40k. 1990


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:51 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands