Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Wage theft (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/150268-wage-theft.html)

NJGov 05-12-2025 03:08 PM

Wage theft
 
Can someone please explain to me how.. when 63% of claims prove to be inaccurately paid the first time.. the company isn’t being brought to some lawful remedy concerning wage theft?

how do we have no teeth in this and it continues from a department of labor level?

if the above and below wing workers weren’t paid correctly, wouldn’t there be some level of state investigation to that effect?

what am I missing?

this is getting ridiculous

Viper25 05-12-2025 03:35 PM


Originally Posted by NJGov (Post 3911826)
Can someone please explain to me how.. when 63% of claims prove to be inaccurately paid the first time.. the company isn’t being brought to some lawful remedy concerning wage theft?

how do we have no teeth in this and it continues from a department of labor level?

if the above and below wing workers weren’t paid correctly, wouldn’t there be some level of state investigation to that effect?

what am I missing?

this is getting ridiculous


Agree completely. Been going on way too long. Where is ALPA with the justified escalation, especially with the mountain of evidence?

igotgummed 05-12-2025 03:35 PM


Originally Posted by NJGov (Post 3911826)
Can someone please explain to me how.. when 63% of claims prove to be inaccurately paid the first time.. the company isn’t being brought to some lawful remedy concerning wage theft?

how do we have no teeth in this and it continues from a department of labor level?

if the above and below wing workers weren’t paid correctly, wouldn’t there be some level of state investigation to that effect?

what am I missing?

this is getting ridiculous

The timing of this email, coming out the same day as some silly e-card from mgmt…..is priceless.

Can we get some bag tags? “63% of the time, it’s wrong every time”

FangsF15 05-12-2025 03:36 PM


Originally Posted by NJGov (Post 3911826)
Can someone please explain to me how.. when 63% of claims prove to be inaccurately paid the first time.. the company isn’t being brought to some lawful remedy concerning wage theft?

how do we have no teeth in this and it continues from a department of labor level?

if the above and below wing workers weren’t paid correctly, wouldn’t there be some level of state investigation to that effect?

what am I missing?

this is getting ridiculous

Agree. ALPA is slowly and methodically ratcheting up the pressure. I think they are doing to do it “clean” if they do file a lawsuit, to show how many attempts they have the company to do the right thing.


Originally Posted by igotgummed (Post 3911843)
The timing of this email, coming out the same day as some silly e-card from mgmt…..is priceless.

Can we get some bag tags? “63% of the time, it’s wrong every time”

Lmao. So true.


LumberJack 05-12-2025 04:01 PM


Originally Posted by NJGov (Post 3911826)
Can someone please explain to me how.. when 63% of claims prove to be inaccurately paid the first time.. the company isn’t being brought to some lawful remedy concerning wage theft?

how do we have no teeth in this and it continues from a department of labor level?

if the above and below wing workers weren’t paid correctly, wouldn’t there be some level of state investigation to that effect?

what am I missing?

this is getting ridiculous

100% agree. It's infuriating.

notEnuf 05-12-2025 04:17 PM


Originally Posted by NJGov (Post 3911826)
Can someone please explain to me how.. when 63% of claims prove to be inaccurately paid the first time.. the company isn’t being brought to some lawful remedy concerning wage theft?

how do we have no teeth in this and it continues from a department of labor level?

if the above and below wing workers weren’t paid correctly, wouldn’t there be some level of state investigation to that effect?

what am I missing?

this is getting ridiculous

Agreed. Quit telling me about it and do something about it. Making a 4 part video series on how to check your check is NOT doing something about it.

Viper25 05-12-2025 04:37 PM

United’s pay is completely automated. And that includes the most recent contract where many provisions were copied/pasted from Delta’s. The idea that it’s too hard to promptly program is laughable.

There is one exception though. It’s a manual process for them to get compensation pay for not getting a first class deadheads seat.

BurritoBeach 05-12-2025 04:49 PM


Originally Posted by Viper25 (Post 3911855)
United’s pay is completely automated. And that includes the most recent contract where many provisions were copied/pasted from Delta’s. The idea that it’s too hard to promptly program is laughable.

There is one exception though. It’s a manual process for them to get compensation pay for not getting a first class deadheads seat.

We only get the add pay if we have to sit in a middle seat. I like your idea better though!

LumberJack 05-12-2025 04:59 PM


Originally Posted by BurritoBeach (Post 3911858)
We only get the add pay if we have to sit in a middle seat. I like your idea better though!

Does United get first class on most domestic DHs? We only get it for 3 hour legs that have a flying leg after.

ancman 05-12-2025 05:08 PM


Originally Posted by LumberJack (Post 3911862)
Does United get first class on most domestic DHs? We only get it for 3 hour legs that have a flying leg after.

They get first on every DH, if available at the time of booking. If an F seat wasn’t available at the time of booking, they’re placed on the upgrade list ahead of all other passengers (unless the DH was created less than 3 hours prior to departure).

Gone Flying 05-12-2025 06:37 PM


Originally Posted by NJGov (Post 3911826)
Can someone please explain to me how.. when 63% of claims prove to be inaccurately paid the first time.. the company isn’t being brought to some lawful remedy concerning wage theft?

how do we have no teeth in this and it continues from a department of labor level?

if the above and below wing workers weren’t paid correctly, wouldn’t there be some level of state investigation to that effect?

what am I missing?

this is getting ridiculous

we could take it to an arbitrator, but recent rulings have shown they will say things like positive space means space available.

We could have undeniable proof this is all 100% intentional wage theft and I don’t think the DOL would care.

Taking it up in one of our more labor friendly bases might work, but isn’t DL openly ignoring state labor laws in MN right now ?

Wage theft is very common in the US. The reason it’s so common is because it’s allowed by virtue of it is almost never actually prosecuted.

ancman 05-12-2025 07:37 PM


Originally Posted by METO Guido (Post 3911894)
Q: So why do want to work here over some other airline?

A: Because you pay so much one day I’ll be able to sue you for wage theft using some outrageous interpretation of labor code in MN.

Terrific use of your troll account.

DeltaboundRedux 05-12-2025 08:44 PM

What are you prepared to do? (Beyond ask nicely)

ancman 05-12-2025 09:22 PM


Originally Posted by DeltaboundRedux (Post 3911909)
What are you prepared to do? (Beyond ask nicely)

Evidently AI knows exactly what to do.

BlueSkies 05-13-2025 03:53 AM


Originally Posted by METO Guido (Post 3911894)
Q: So why do want to work here over some other airline?

A: Because you pay so much one day I’ll be able to sue you for wage theft using some outrageous interpretation of labor code in MN.

So because we make good money we aren't entitled to complain and/or do anything about our employer not paying us correctly?

Hubcapped 05-13-2025 04:49 AM


Originally Posted by ancman (Post 3911899)
Terrific use of your troll account.

it’s straight cringe when non delta trolls enter our specific chats.

ancman 05-13-2025 04:56 AM


Originally Posted by Hubcapped (Post 3911946)
it’s straight cringe when non delta trolls enter our specific chats.

Definitely. In this case though, I’m 99% sure we’re dealing with an AI bot.

Turbo1 05-13-2025 05:05 AM


Originally Posted by NJGov (Post 3911826)
Can someone please explain to me how.. when 63% of claims prove to be inaccurately paid the first time.. the company isn’t being brought to some lawful remedy concerning wage theft?

how do we have no teeth in this and it continues from a department of labor level?

if the above and below wing workers weren’t paid correctly, wouldn’t there be some level of state investigation to that effect?

what am I missing?

this is getting ridiculous

I was shorted $5000 during training on my last long school. I have absolutely no doubt this goes on all the time and it is on purpose. Check your checks boys……If there is an error do you honestly believe it will ever be in your favor?

Meme In Command 05-13-2025 05:07 AM


Originally Posted by ancman (Post 3911949)
Definitely. In this case though, I’m 99% sure we’re dealing with an AI bot.


Originally Posted by METO Guido (Post 3911952)
Here to learn? meto said you’d bite. Once again, thanks for sharing.

As for rest of the dog collar squadron, by all means, hit ‘em where it hurts. Wage theft..lolz

He sounds like he thinks he's Matthew McConaughey giving the Wolf of Wall Street monologue

Hotel Kilo 05-13-2025 05:19 AM


Originally Posted by NJGov (Post 3911826)
Can someone please explain to me how.. when 63% of claims prove to be inaccurately paid the first time.. the company isn’t being brought to some lawful remedy concerning wage theft?

how do we have no teeth in this and it continues from a department of labor level?

if the above and below wing workers weren’t paid correctly, wouldn’t there be some level of state investigation to that effect?

what am I missing?

this is getting ridiculous

Far past time for something to be done here.

CX500T 05-13-2025 07:21 AM


Originally Posted by Turbo1 (Post 3911955)
I was shorted $5000 during training on my last long school. I have absolutely no doubt this goes on all the time and it is on purpose. Check your checks boys……If there is an error do you honestly believe it will ever be in your favor?

If it was a no joke error in a manual process, it would at least occasionally go in your favor. So far between ACE and STS I've gotten about $65k in pay shorted. And probably got double that paid to other pilots.


No way Its not intentional.

OOfff 05-13-2025 07:31 AM


Originally Posted by CX500T (Post 3912006)
If it was a no joke error in a manual process, it would at least occasionally go in your favor. So far between ACE and STS I've gotten about $65k in pay shorted. And probably got double that paid to other pilots.


No way Its not intentional.

errors of commission vs errors of omission. the latter is far more likely, which is why it seems to go in the company’s favor all the time.

thats not to excuse the issues, just to explain that errors do not occur with the same probability.

Boatbuilder 05-13-2025 07:48 AM

Hats off for correct pay?

theUpsideDown 05-13-2025 08:12 AM


Originally Posted by Boatbuilder (Post 3912012)
Hats off for correct pay?

f'ing sold

Viper25 05-13-2025 08:19 AM


Originally Posted by Boatbuilder (Post 3912012)
Hats off for correct pay?

Would be huge support if ALPA pushed this.

Rooster435 05-13-2025 08:48 AM


Originally Posted by Turbo1 (Post 3911955)
I was shorted $5000 during training on my last long school. I have absolutely no doubt this goes on all the time and it is on purpose. Check your checks boys……If there is an error do you honestly believe it will ever be in your favor?

Mind if I ask what for? I’ve been trying to recover about $4k since Feb when they calculated my reserve guarantee incorrectly in a month with 19 days of qual training. At this point I’m not confident I’ll ever see it.

Turbo1 05-13-2025 10:11 AM


Originally Posted by Rooster435 (Post 3912030)
Mind if I ask what for? I’ve been trying to recover about $4k since Feb when they calculated my reserve guarantee incorrectly in a month with 19 days of qual training. At this point I’m not confident I’ll ever see it.

…..Been too many years since the incident. I thought my check was light so I brought it to the attention of payroll on the phone and she proceeded to rattle off why it was what it was and then she got silent for a minute followed by a “can I call you right back?” I was told there was an error and I was owed 5k. I was delivered a check shortly at the Holiday Inn and we got to talking. I asked had I not said anything would the error have been found and I was told no, probably not. You can bet your ass that if the error was in the company’s favor they would beat down your door for a refund. THERE ARE NO CHECKS AND BALANCES HERE. Absolutely criminal.

PowderPilot2016 05-13-2025 10:27 AM

I vote union should come out and tell all pilots not to hand out any trading cards till pay is fixed.

connollc 05-13-2025 10:36 AM


Originally Posted by Boatbuilder (Post 3912012)
Hats off for correct pay?

I like it, but more a fan of the jacket off campaign

igotgummed 05-13-2025 11:47 AM


Originally Posted by PowderPilot2016 (Post 3912059)
I vote union should come out and tell all pilots not to hand out any trading cards till pay is fixed.


This, along with hats, would be great. BUT….we’re not unified enough. The die hards would scoff, just like they did during the original hats off campaign.

Flyweight 05-13-2025 01:00 PM

How about the $1.89 or $5.52 that we all got paid, well some of us did based off my unscientific polls from the company for “incorrect reroute pay?” Whats the transparency ot that?

All smoke and mirrors to show “good faith or intent” i think

Im already down $150 this month on my time card for incorrect reroute pay.

ancman 05-13-2025 01:16 PM


Originally Posted by igotgummed (Post 3912078)
This, along with hats, would be great. BUT….we’re not unified enough. The die hards would scoff, just like they did during the original hats off campaign.

I think we would easily see an 80%+ participation rate toward another hats off campaign, especially in non-ATL bases. The die hards are dwindling in number fast.

I never put my hat back on personally. ALPA never called for an end to the last campaign. We certainly don’t have a fully implemented, nor fully adhered to contract.

FangsF15 05-13-2025 01:35 PM


Originally Posted by ancman (Post 3912096)
I think we would easily see an 80%+ participation rate toward another hats off campaign, especially in non-ATL bases. The die hards are dwindling in number fast.

I never put my hat back on personally. ALPA never called for an end to the last campaign. We certainly don’t have a fully implemented, nor fully adhered to contract.

I genuinely believe an official ALPA "hats off to..." campaign would be much higher than 4 out of 5. I don't have a scientific poll, but during the C19 "hats off" campaign, I'd bet participation was at least 90 or 95%, even in ATL. Many LCA's were even participating.

That said, I'd bet ALPA wants to keep that powder dry for C26.

Hotel Kilo 05-13-2025 02:38 PM


Originally Posted by FangsF15 (Post 3912102)
I genuinely believe an official ALPA "hats off to..." campaign would be much higher than 4 out of 5. I don't have a scientific poll, but during the C19 "hats off" campaign, I'd bet participation was at least 90 or 95%, even in ATL. Many LCA's were even participating.

That said, I'd bet ALPA wants to keep that powder dry for C26.

I partially agree with you Fangs. But we need to turn up some heat on this pay issue. Bill boards, lanyards, whatever. We need to start making a little noise out there. Our approach (DALPA) is not really a winning strategy thus far. The company continues to flagrantly and willfully violate our pay as it pertains to our PWA. Those are undisputed facts.

They can cry about technology and software integration or whatever other excuse du jour. UAL seemed to be able to almost instantly implement their contract pay provisions. We're 3 years on and still it's a mess. Tired of the excuses from management and to some extent DALPA. This should have been rectified 2 years ago.

Viper25 05-13-2025 02:55 PM


Originally Posted by Hotel Kilo (Post 3912121)
I partially agree with you Fangs. But we need to turn up some heat on this pay issue. Bill boards, lanyards, whatever. We need to start making a little noise out there. Our approach (DALPA) is not really a winning strategy thus far. The company continues to flagrantly and willfully violate our pay as it pertains to our PWA. Those are undisputed facts.

They can cry about technology and software integration or whatever other excuse du jour. UAL seemed to be able to almost instantly implement their contract pay provisions. We're 3 years on and still it's a mess. Tired of the excuses from management and to some extent DALPA. This should have been rectified 2 years ago.


Spot on. It’s been too long and the heat needs to increase!

What is DALPA doing besides sending us emails!?!?

beernutt 05-13-2025 03:01 PM

https://youtu.be/jLO7VrRij_M?si=xC06Du0k0gzF9uKc

Abouttime2fish 05-13-2025 03:45 PM


Originally Posted by igotgummed (Post 3912078)
This, along with hats, would be great. BUT….we’re not unified enough. The die hards would scoff, just like they did during the original hats off campaign.

it’s summer time, I wanna wear shorts!

notEnuf 05-13-2025 04:41 PM


Originally Posted by Boatbuilder (Post 3912012)
Hats off for correct pay?

Who still wears a hat? Or a uniform sanctioned by Delta???

Hats off to state law
Hats off to wage theft
Hats off to good faith basis
Hats off to C19 full implementation
Hats off to reserve assignment accuracy

etc.

notEnuf 05-13-2025 04:48 PM


Originally Posted by PowderPilot2016 (Post 3912059)
I vote union should come out and tell all pilots not to hand out any trading cards till pay is fixed.

DALPA needs their own cards.

ancman 05-13-2025 05:17 PM


Originally Posted by notEnuf (Post 3912160)
DALPA needs their own cards.

DALPA trading cards with informational picketing type messaging on one side would be terrific.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:26 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands