![]() |
Wage theft
Can someone please explain to me how.. when 63% of claims prove to be inaccurately paid the first time.. the company isn’t being brought to some lawful remedy concerning wage theft?
how do we have no teeth in this and it continues from a department of labor level? if the above and below wing workers weren’t paid correctly, wouldn’t there be some level of state investigation to that effect? what am I missing? this is getting ridiculous |
Originally Posted by NJGov
(Post 3911826)
Can someone please explain to me how.. when 63% of claims prove to be inaccurately paid the first time.. the company isn’t being brought to some lawful remedy concerning wage theft?
how do we have no teeth in this and it continues from a department of labor level? if the above and below wing workers weren’t paid correctly, wouldn’t there be some level of state investigation to that effect? what am I missing? this is getting ridiculous Agree completely. Been going on way too long. Where is ALPA with the justified escalation, especially with the mountain of evidence? |
Originally Posted by NJGov
(Post 3911826)
Can someone please explain to me how.. when 63% of claims prove to be inaccurately paid the first time.. the company isn’t being brought to some lawful remedy concerning wage theft?
how do we have no teeth in this and it continues from a department of labor level? if the above and below wing workers weren’t paid correctly, wouldn’t there be some level of state investigation to that effect? what am I missing? this is getting ridiculous Can we get some bag tags? “63% of the time, it’s wrong every time” |
Originally Posted by NJGov
(Post 3911826)
Can someone please explain to me how.. when 63% of claims prove to be inaccurately paid the first time.. the company isn’t being brought to some lawful remedy concerning wage theft?
how do we have no teeth in this and it continues from a department of labor level? if the above and below wing workers weren’t paid correctly, wouldn’t there be some level of state investigation to that effect? what am I missing? this is getting ridiculous
Originally Posted by igotgummed
(Post 3911843)
The timing of this email, coming out the same day as some silly e-card from mgmt…..is priceless.
Can we get some bag tags? “63% of the time, it’s wrong every time” |
Originally Posted by NJGov
(Post 3911826)
Can someone please explain to me how.. when 63% of claims prove to be inaccurately paid the first time.. the company isn’t being brought to some lawful remedy concerning wage theft?
how do we have no teeth in this and it continues from a department of labor level? if the above and below wing workers weren’t paid correctly, wouldn’t there be some level of state investigation to that effect? what am I missing? this is getting ridiculous |
Originally Posted by NJGov
(Post 3911826)
Can someone please explain to me how.. when 63% of claims prove to be inaccurately paid the first time.. the company isn’t being brought to some lawful remedy concerning wage theft?
how do we have no teeth in this and it continues from a department of labor level? if the above and below wing workers weren’t paid correctly, wouldn’t there be some level of state investigation to that effect? what am I missing? this is getting ridiculous |
United’s pay is completely automated. And that includes the most recent contract where many provisions were copied/pasted from Delta’s. The idea that it’s too hard to promptly program is laughable.
There is one exception though. It’s a manual process for them to get compensation pay for not getting a first class deadheads seat. |
Originally Posted by Viper25
(Post 3911855)
United’s pay is completely automated. And that includes the most recent contract where many provisions were copied/pasted from Delta’s. The idea that it’s too hard to promptly program is laughable.
There is one exception though. It’s a manual process for them to get compensation pay for not getting a first class deadheads seat. |
Originally Posted by BurritoBeach
(Post 3911858)
We only get the add pay if we have to sit in a middle seat. I like your idea better though!
|
Originally Posted by LumberJack
(Post 3911862)
Does United get first class on most domestic DHs? We only get it for 3 hour legs that have a flying leg after.
|
Originally Posted by NJGov
(Post 3911826)
Can someone please explain to me how.. when 63% of claims prove to be inaccurately paid the first time.. the company isn’t being brought to some lawful remedy concerning wage theft?
how do we have no teeth in this and it continues from a department of labor level? if the above and below wing workers weren’t paid correctly, wouldn’t there be some level of state investigation to that effect? what am I missing? this is getting ridiculous We could have undeniable proof this is all 100% intentional wage theft and I don’t think the DOL would care. Taking it up in one of our more labor friendly bases might work, but isn’t DL openly ignoring state labor laws in MN right now ? Wage theft is very common in the US. The reason it’s so common is because it’s allowed by virtue of it is almost never actually prosecuted. |
Originally Posted by METO Guido
(Post 3911894)
Q: So why do want to work here over some other airline?
A: Because you pay so much one day I’ll be able to sue you for wage theft using some outrageous interpretation of labor code in MN. |
What are you prepared to do? (Beyond ask nicely)
|
Originally Posted by DeltaboundRedux
(Post 3911909)
What are you prepared to do? (Beyond ask nicely)
|
Originally Posted by METO Guido
(Post 3911894)
Q: So why do want to work here over some other airline?
A: Because you pay so much one day I’ll be able to sue you for wage theft using some outrageous interpretation of labor code in MN. |
Originally Posted by ancman
(Post 3911899)
Terrific use of your troll account.
|
Originally Posted by Hubcapped
(Post 3911946)
it’s straight cringe when non delta trolls enter our specific chats.
|
Originally Posted by NJGov
(Post 3911826)
Can someone please explain to me how.. when 63% of claims prove to be inaccurately paid the first time.. the company isn’t being brought to some lawful remedy concerning wage theft?
how do we have no teeth in this and it continues from a department of labor level? if the above and below wing workers weren’t paid correctly, wouldn’t there be some level of state investigation to that effect? what am I missing? this is getting ridiculous |
Originally Posted by ancman
(Post 3911949)
Definitely. In this case though, I’m 99% sure we’re dealing with an AI bot.
Originally Posted by METO Guido
(Post 3911952)
Here to learn? meto said you’d bite. Once again, thanks for sharing.
As for rest of the dog collar squadron, by all means, hit ‘em where it hurts. Wage theft..lolz |
Originally Posted by NJGov
(Post 3911826)
Can someone please explain to me how.. when 63% of claims prove to be inaccurately paid the first time.. the company isn’t being brought to some lawful remedy concerning wage theft?
how do we have no teeth in this and it continues from a department of labor level? if the above and below wing workers weren’t paid correctly, wouldn’t there be some level of state investigation to that effect? what am I missing? this is getting ridiculous |
Originally Posted by Turbo1
(Post 3911955)
I was shorted $5000 during training on my last long school. I have absolutely no doubt this goes on all the time and it is on purpose. Check your checks boys……If there is an error do you honestly believe it will ever be in your favor?
No way Its not intentional. |
Originally Posted by CX500T
(Post 3912006)
If it was a no joke error in a manual process, it would at least occasionally go in your favor. So far between ACE and STS I've gotten about $65k in pay shorted. And probably got double that paid to other pilots.
No way Its not intentional. thats not to excuse the issues, just to explain that errors do not occur with the same probability. |
Hats off for correct pay?
|
Originally Posted by Boatbuilder
(Post 3912012)
Hats off for correct pay?
|
Originally Posted by Boatbuilder
(Post 3912012)
Hats off for correct pay?
|
Originally Posted by Turbo1
(Post 3911955)
I was shorted $5000 during training on my last long school. I have absolutely no doubt this goes on all the time and it is on purpose. Check your checks boys……If there is an error do you honestly believe it will ever be in your favor?
|
Originally Posted by Rooster435
(Post 3912030)
Mind if I ask what for? I’ve been trying to recover about $4k since Feb when they calculated my reserve guarantee incorrectly in a month with 19 days of qual training. At this point I’m not confident I’ll ever see it.
|
I vote union should come out and tell all pilots not to hand out any trading cards till pay is fixed.
|
Originally Posted by Boatbuilder
(Post 3912012)
Hats off for correct pay?
|
Originally Posted by PowderPilot2016
(Post 3912059)
I vote union should come out and tell all pilots not to hand out any trading cards till pay is fixed.
This, along with hats, would be great. BUT….we’re not unified enough. The die hards would scoff, just like they did during the original hats off campaign. |
How about the $1.89 or $5.52 that we all got paid, well some of us did based off my unscientific polls from the company for “incorrect reroute pay?” Whats the transparency ot that?
All smoke and mirrors to show “good faith or intent” i think Im already down $150 this month on my time card for incorrect reroute pay. |
Originally Posted by igotgummed
(Post 3912078)
This, along with hats, would be great. BUT….we’re not unified enough. The die hards would scoff, just like they did during the original hats off campaign.
I never put my hat back on personally. ALPA never called for an end to the last campaign. We certainly don’t have a fully implemented, nor fully adhered to contract. |
Originally Posted by ancman
(Post 3912096)
I think we would easily see an 80%+ participation rate toward another hats off campaign, especially in non-ATL bases. The die hards are dwindling in number fast.
I never put my hat back on personally. ALPA never called for an end to the last campaign. We certainly don’t have a fully implemented, nor fully adhered to contract. That said, I'd bet ALPA wants to keep that powder dry for C26. |
Originally Posted by FangsF15
(Post 3912102)
I genuinely believe an official ALPA "hats off to..." campaign would be much higher than 4 out of 5. I don't have a scientific poll, but during the C19 "hats off" campaign, I'd bet participation was at least 90 or 95%, even in ATL. Many LCA's were even participating.
That said, I'd bet ALPA wants to keep that powder dry for C26. They can cry about technology and software integration or whatever other excuse du jour. UAL seemed to be able to almost instantly implement their contract pay provisions. We're 3 years on and still it's a mess. Tired of the excuses from management and to some extent DALPA. This should have been rectified 2 years ago. |
Originally Posted by Hotel Kilo
(Post 3912121)
I partially agree with you Fangs. But we need to turn up some heat on this pay issue. Bill boards, lanyards, whatever. We need to start making a little noise out there. Our approach (DALPA) is not really a winning strategy thus far. The company continues to flagrantly and willfully violate our pay as it pertains to our PWA. Those are undisputed facts.
They can cry about technology and software integration or whatever other excuse du jour. UAL seemed to be able to almost instantly implement their contract pay provisions. We're 3 years on and still it's a mess. Tired of the excuses from management and to some extent DALPA. This should have been rectified 2 years ago. Spot on. It’s been too long and the heat needs to increase! What is DALPA doing besides sending us emails!?!? |
|
Originally Posted by igotgummed
(Post 3912078)
This, along with hats, would be great. BUT….we’re not unified enough. The die hards would scoff, just like they did during the original hats off campaign.
|
Originally Posted by Boatbuilder
(Post 3912012)
Hats off for correct pay?
Hats off to state law Hats off to wage theft Hats off to good faith basis Hats off to C19 full implementation Hats off to reserve assignment accuracy etc. |
Originally Posted by PowderPilot2016
(Post 3912059)
I vote union should come out and tell all pilots not to hand out any trading cards till pay is fixed.
|
Originally Posted by notEnuf
(Post 3912160)
DALPA needs their own cards.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:26 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands