Q3 earnings call
#221
Probably not worth engaging with someone who isn't either genuine or just trolling. Bringing in 'greenhadi' and other weird bits just tells me it will go nowhere fast.
#222
Funny how fast some of you read long articles…. Not.
#223
Line Holder

Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 305
So far you’ve posted articles from a group that says smoking isn’t bad for you and a science article from someone who has no science knowledge besides what you take as a freshman in college.
I mean, not like it’s been difficult to debunk everything you’ve posted.
Let’s see, what are those two words in NOAA, is it Ocean and Atmospheric? Yeah, really going out of bounds there with studying the ocean and the atmosphere.
I mean, not like it’s been difficult to debunk everything you’ve posted.
Let’s see, what are those two words in NOAA, is it Ocean and Atmospheric? Yeah, really going out of bounds there with studying the ocean and the atmosphere.
#224
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,522
Likes: 1,113
Good call. I have no problem having a civil debate. But he admittedly doesn't know how climate and weather works and has no genuine curiosity to learn. He just wants to throw out logical fallacies and troll
#225
Defending big gubment like a good socialist. NOAA and NASA have expanded well beyond their original mission statement. They’re bloated and dysfunctional. Oh my god (says the greenhadi), they’ve cut NOAA! We wont see the hurricanes coming and we will all die. The Orangeman is truly evil! (That’s also sarcasm…. I love the Orangeman).
I love the Orangeman = loves a politician. Don't even care the party. Just straight up loves a politician (cringe and weird) AFTER beginning his post with his clear disdain for "guhbment".
But I'm the brainwashed one....
#226
Because I want my lights to work w/out blackouts Im anti-environmental? That’s the problem w/ this whole discussion. I triggered some of you by saying wind energy doesn’t work well…. The rest is history. Good luck w/ wind. I live in coal country. No blackouts here. Enjoyed the discussion.
#227
Banned
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
Because I want my lights to work w/out blackouts Im anti-environmental? That’s the problem w/ this whole discussion. I triggered some of you by saying wind energy doesn’t work well…. The rest is history. Good luck w/ wind. I live in coal country. No blackouts here. Enjoyed the discussion.
#228
Because I want my lights to work w/out blackouts Im anti-environmental? That’s the problem w/ this whole discussion. I triggered some of you by saying wind energy doesn’t work well…. The rest is history. Good luck w/ wind. I live in coal country. No blackouts here. Enjoyed the discussion.
Maybe don't drink the tap water at home, it might be contami.......eh nevermind, that ship has dailed
#229
Oh look, it's the tried and true devolution of renewable energy discourse into hippie earth saving granola bullsh!t and once again never speaking in terms of national security and energy independence.
Yawn...
Funny how China is covering their landscape in solar panels though. Yes, famous tree hugging hippies: THE CHINESE. The CCP folded to the environmentalist "Save the Pangolin!" Campaign...
But the way, all for nuclear energy. Split baby split! (As in the atom)
Yawn...
Funny how China is covering their landscape in solar panels though. Yes, famous tree hugging hippies: THE CHINESE. The CCP folded to the environmentalist "Save the Pangolin!" Campaign...

But the way, all for nuclear energy. Split baby split! (As in the atom)
#230
I recently went to visit Plymouth Rock. I have ancestors that came over on the Mayflower. It was a fun trip. I also noticed that the plymouth rock at high tide wasn't under water. Heck the water barely touches the base of it. So if there is a warming and melting of ice caps, shouldn't the sea also be rising? I read about this all the time yet here is this rock, circa like 1620 or so, and it's not underwater at high tide (it was a king tide too). The water barely touched the base of it. Locals said it's been like that for as long as they can remember for generations.
- 1774: Plymouth residents attempted to move the rock from the shoreline to the town square as a patriotic symbol before the Revolutionary War. It broke in half during the process.
- 1834: The town moved the top portion of the rock to Pilgrim Hall Museum. It broke a second time while being transported.
- Decades later: The rock suffered further damage as souvenir hunters repeatedly chipped away at it.
- 1880s: The two main pieces of the rock were reunited and returned to the shore near its original location.
- 1920: The rock was moved one last time when Plymouth's waterfront was redeveloped. It was placed inside its current protective structure.
https://seeplymouth.com/news/follow-...plymouth-rock/
Last edited by notEnuf; 10-15-2025 at 01:00 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




