Search

Notices

Q3 earnings call

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-15-2025 | 09:19 AM
  #221  
velosnow's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,342
Likes: 61
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy
I'm not clicking on a rage bait spam article. Those are not facts. They are editorialized and not peer reviewed. Everything you just said is either a red herring or stawman presented as a digital gish gallop
Probably not worth engaging with someone who isn't either genuine or just trolling. Bringing in 'greenhadi' and other weird bits just tells me it will go nowhere fast.
Reply
Old 10-15-2025 | 09:19 AM
  #222  
Tailhookah's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 794
Likes: 2
From: Widget Jet
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy
I'm not clicking on a rage bait spam article. Those are not facts. They are editorialized and not peer reviewed. Everything you just said is either a red herring or stawman presented as a digital gish gallop
The data in the graphs are not factual? NOAA data and CU? Guess they’re not factual agencies. Better call DJT and tell him to shut them down also.

Funny how fast some of you read long articles…. Not.
Reply
Old 10-15-2025 | 09:26 AM
  #223  
Line Holder
Veteran: Navy
5 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 305
Default

Originally Posted by Tailhookah
Not what I said. But that’s good. Keep up the good work.
So far you’ve posted articles from a group that says smoking isn’t bad for you and a science article from someone who has no science knowledge besides what you take as a freshman in college.

I mean, not like it’s been difficult to debunk everything you’ve posted.

Let’s see, what are those two words in NOAA, is it Ocean and Atmospheric? Yeah, really going out of bounds there with studying the ocean and the atmosphere.
Reply
Old 10-15-2025 | 09:36 AM
  #224  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,522
Likes: 1,113
Default

Originally Posted by velosnow
Probably not worth engaging with someone who isn't either genuine or just trolling. Bringing in 'greenhadi' and other weird bits just tells me it will go nowhere fast.
Good call. I have no problem having a civil debate. But he admittedly doesn't know how climate and weather works and has no genuine curiosity to learn. He just wants to throw out logical fallacies and troll
Reply
Old 10-15-2025 | 09:37 AM
  #225  
Meme In Command's Avatar
Leaves Biscoff crumbs
Veteran: Army
Loved
On Reserve
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,265
Likes: 941
From: Blue Juice Taste Tester
Default

Originally Posted by Tailhookah
Defending big gubment like a good socialist. NOAA and NASA have expanded well beyond their original mission statement. They’re bloated and dysfunctional. Oh my god (says the greenhadi), they’ve cut NOAA! We wont see the hurricanes coming and we will all die. The Orangeman is truly evil! (That’s also sarcasm…. I love the Orangeman).
Greenhadi = Caring for the environment puts you on some equal plane as a religious fundamentalist terrorist and continues to show a completely inability to separate renewable energy discourse from "green" arguments.

I love the Orangeman = loves a politician. Don't even care the party. Just straight up loves a politician (cringe and weird) AFTER beginning his post with his clear disdain for "guhbment".

But I'm the brainwashed one....
Reply
Old 10-15-2025 | 11:15 AM
  #226  
Tailhookah's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 794
Likes: 2
From: Widget Jet
Default

Because I want my lights to work w/out blackouts Im anti-environmental? That’s the problem w/ this whole discussion. I triggered some of you by saying wind energy doesn’t work well…. The rest is history. Good luck w/ wind. I live in coal country. No blackouts here. Enjoyed the discussion.
Reply
Old 10-15-2025 | 11:47 AM
  #227  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
Default

Originally Posted by Tailhookah
Because I want my lights to work w/out blackouts Im anti-environmental? That’s the problem w/ this whole discussion. I triggered some of you by saying wind energy doesn’t work well…. The rest is history. Good luck w/ wind. I live in coal country. No blackouts here. Enjoyed the discussion.
still not acknowledging that you were fooled by an intentional lie in that wind power meme, huh?
Reply
Old 10-15-2025 | 12:09 PM
  #228  
Meme In Command's Avatar
Leaves Biscoff crumbs
Veteran: Army
Loved
On Reserve
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,265
Likes: 941
From: Blue Juice Taste Tester
Default

Originally Posted by Tailhookah
Because I want my lights to work w/out blackouts Im anti-environmental? That’s the problem w/ this whole discussion. I triggered some of you by saying wind energy doesn’t work well…. The rest is history. Good luck w/ wind. I live in coal country. No blackouts here. Enjoyed the discussion.
The quickest Google search will show WV doesn't even rank anywhere near the top on power grid reliability. But hey, don't let the facts get in the way of a good rant.

Maybe don't drink the tap water at home, it might be contami.......eh nevermind, that ship has dailed
Reply
Old 10-15-2025 | 12:29 PM
  #229  
notEnuf's Avatar
Thread Starter
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,325
Likes: 814
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by Meme In Command
Oh look, it's the tried and true devolution of renewable energy discourse into hippie earth saving granola bullsh!t and once again never speaking in terms of national security and energy independence.

Yawn...

Funny how China is covering their landscape in solar panels though. Yes, famous tree hugging hippies: THE CHINESE. The CCP folded to the environmentalist "Save the Pangolin!" Campaign...

But the way, all for nuclear energy. Split baby split! (As in the atom)
...fuse baby fuse, the real answer. That fusion reactor is called the sun BTW.

Reply
Old 10-15-2025 | 12:39 PM
  #230  
notEnuf's Avatar
Thread Starter
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,325
Likes: 814
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by Hotel Kilo
I recently went to visit Plymouth Rock. I have ancestors that came over on the Mayflower. It was a fun trip. I also noticed that the plymouth rock at high tide wasn't under water. Heck the water barely touches the base of it. So if there is a warming and melting of ice caps, shouldn't the sea also be rising? I read about this all the time yet here is this rock, circa like 1620 or so, and it's not underwater at high tide (it was a king tide too). The water barely touched the base of it. Locals said it's been like that for as long as they can remember for generations.
Timeline of Plymouth Rock's movements
  • 1774: Plymouth residents attempted to move the rock from the shoreline to the town square as a patriotic symbol before the Revolutionary War. It broke in half during the process.
  • 1834: The town moved the top portion of the rock to Pilgrim Hall Museum. It broke a second time while being transported.
  • Decades later: The rock suffered further damage as souvenir hunters repeatedly chipped away at it.
  • 1880s: The two main pieces of the rock were reunited and returned to the shore near its original location.
  • 1920: The rock was moved one last time when Plymouth's waterfront was redeveloped. It was placed inside its current protective structure.

https://seeplymouth.com/news/follow-...plymouth-rock/

Last edited by notEnuf; 10-15-2025 at 01:00 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BestForward
JetBlue
14673
04-08-2026 11:34 AM
hercretired
Frontier
264
08-23-2025 08:30 PM
hercretired
UPS
1
08-04-2025 08:24 AM
Colonel S
United
25
05-04-2022 03:46 AM
hyperone
Cargo
14
10-27-2007 05:28 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices