Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Thoughts on returning from LTD >

Thoughts on returning from LTD

Search

Notices

Thoughts on returning from LTD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-14-2026 | 08:16 AM
  #11  
Can’t find crew pickup
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,059
Likes: 200
Default

Originally Posted by Speed Select
Right. But CS goes straight to QS, skipping GS, these days. So in effect, QS has replaced GS is a practical sense.

That said, it seems CS goes to QS so early in some categories that QS is doable for some commuters.

Heres one for you… positive space commute to work for QS.
Well, again, the problem is the fact that it can’t get to GS because of farmers. Not bemoaning people using their PWA privileges, but the reason it isn’t getting to GS isn’t because of QS.

Edit: nene had a better explanation .
Reply
Old 05-14-2026 | 08:26 AM
  #12  
captkdobbs's Avatar
Back on Reserve
Veteran: Army
10 Years
On Reserve
20 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 845
Likes: 29
Default

This is just for your verification: have you been out for at least 6-months of "Unpaid Status" (actual STD/LTD)

The reason I bring this up is that, if you've been out for a total of 6-9 months, the first several months are considered "Paid Status" while you burned through your Sick time/Vacation.

If you haven't been out for 6 months of actual STD/LTD, you return to the BES from which you left. No choice. Then you are at the whim of the AE system for your next move.
Reply
Old 05-14-2026 | 09:55 AM
  #13  
notEnuf's Avatar
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,337
Likes: 822
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by Whoopsmybad
Well, again, the problem is the fact that it can’t get to GS because of farmers. Not bemoaning people using their PWA privileges, but the reason it isn’t getting to GS isn’t because of QS.

Edit: nene had a better explanation .
You are only going a single step into this analysis. It's because the company chooses to run "a little hot" setting up the circumstances for 23M7. The root cause has nothing to do with pilots. The company exploited 23M7 and then negotiated it's expanded use. They chose to design schedule coverage around their newfound win and... consequences. Add in their batch size choices and PB day consent choice and you no longer have people readily available or willing to come in on off days. Commuters can be farmers too and probably had more OBWS experience than the masses.

Last edited by notEnuf; 05-14-2026 at 10:18 AM.
Reply
Old 05-14-2026 | 10:20 AM
  #14  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,160
Likes: 27
Default

My first thought after reading your “wants” was 320B.
Since you flew 330, it will be like riding a bike. It’s sooo nice being in the top 10% seniority. Especially as a commuter.
Reply
Old 05-14-2026 | 10:22 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,563
Likes: 21
Default

Originally Posted by CRJphlyer
QS put a sizable dent in premium flying for commuters. Nothing goes out as a GS anymore and QS are too close in to try and snag for most commuters.

So basically, “sucks to be the 50% of pilots at this airline that commute.”

QS should have gone to a vote by the pilots, but what do I know…
as already pointed out, this is not true. All it did was replace IA free for all with a seniority based system that has accountability and a paper trail.
Reply
Old 05-14-2026 | 10:31 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 2,248
Likes: 103
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
You are only going a single step into this analysis. It's because the company chooses to run "a little hot" setting up the circumstances for 23M7. The root cause has nothing to do with pilots. The company exploited 23M7 and then negotiated it's expanded use. They chose to design schedule coverage around their newfound win and... consequences. Add in their batch size choices and PB day consent choice and you no longer have people readily available or willing to come in on off days.

Respectfully, (not defending some of the companies moves), but this feels like a pilots/company created phenomenon. The fact that many categories never even get to GS stage of trip coverage often tells me a combo of CS inexperience, and OOBWS/WS shenanigans is F'ing up the system that had prevailed for a generation.

I don't have the data (and don't care that much about it since I can't control it) but we've been run VERY hot before. Long before ALPA put in the reroute restrictions (IDK but circa 2018 or so) there was a time where we were so short that the company just rerouted you almost every rotation to cover broken trips. Only thing that stayed mostly constant was start/stop day. Newer contracts have put serious $$$ penalties to that behavior and even tho we may be short, there has to be oodles of pilots who would come in for GS pay, just never given the opportunity, meanwhile the company pays daily triple time on multiple trips.

IMO, we can all go "yeah, we have the company by the shorthairs" as they prioritize completion over costs at the moment, but this cost will come from the hides/wallets of the hordes of other pilots who won't sit around and farm for 23M7.

That provision for years was to cover immediate happen chances, like "hey, pilot here on scene wants to fly, but someone was due a chance for that trip", so to make everyone whole and cover the trip. For most of my time here, it was seldom used, now it's used on most of the premium trips in my category, effectively making them all pay triple time. That is not sustainable to the company, and not equitable to the pilot group as a whole.
Reply
Old 05-14-2026 | 10:45 AM
  #17  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 375
Default

Haven't heard RES pilots mentioned in these last couple pages so here's a hot take.

Both GS and QS are lower in the coverage ladder than RES. If there are RES available, they're used first. Or at least they should be. 23M7 or not.

There aren't enough RES pilots (and/or their availability is being throttled), hence GS/QS.
Reply
Old 05-14-2026 | 11:13 AM
  #18  
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,489
Likes: 479
Default

My vote DTW320B. Being top page on MSP220B sounds great, but as you said, it's not been fleshed out, less trip diversity, and slightly fewer bases for potential OOB flying (read front/back end DH) opportunities. Of course the OOB stuff will get better when we finally put this m7 madness behind us, if we don't move OOBWS that is. Even if you're not on the the top page, top 10% is an amazing place to be. I thought life was good when I hit 30%, but being at 8-15% was insanely better. Pick your trips, pick your days off, pick your vacations, trip buys, first shot at GS/SS/QS/etc, first shot at dropping trips. Wife wants to know if you can attend an event 6 months from now? No problem, at that seniority, you know you have it off. If you're not going to go WB, I vote to go where you're the highest seniority in the 320.
Reply
Old 05-14-2026 | 11:43 AM
  #19  
notEnuf's Avatar
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,337
Likes: 822
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by nene
Respectfully, (not defending some of the companies moves), but this feels like a pilots/company created phenomenon. The fact that many categories never even get to GS stage of trip coverage often tells me a combo of CS inexperience, and OOBWS/WS shenanigans is F'ing up the system that had prevailed for a generation.

I don't have the data (and don't care that much about it since I can't control it) but we've been run VERY hot before. Long before ALPA put in the reroute restrictions (IDK but circa 2018 or so) there was a time where we were so short that the company just rerouted you almost every rotation to cover broken trips. Only thing that stayed mostly constant was start/stop day. Newer contracts have put serious $$$ penalties to that behavior and even tho we may be short, there has to be oodles of pilots who would come in for GS pay, just never given the opportunity, meanwhile the company pays daily triple time on multiple trips.

IMO, we can all go "yeah, we have the company by the shorthairs" as they prioritize completion over costs at the moment, but this cost will come from the hides/wallets of the hordes of other pilots who won't sit around and farm for 23M7.

That provision for years was to cover immediate happen chances, like "hey, pilot here on scene wants to fly, but someone was due a chance for that trip", so to make everyone whole and cover the trip. For most of my time here, it was seldom used, now it's used on most of the premium trips in my category, effectively making them all pay triple time. That is not sustainable to the company, and not equitable to the pilot group as a whole.
You are correct and the change was when the COMPANY started using 23M7 at will. The pilots didn't have anything to do with that choice. The resultant fiasco culminated in the new 23M7 use with the 8 hour restriction. The sustainability is entirely up to the company. 23M7 is meant as a deterrent to undermanning and the COMPANY has chosen to pay the penalty over staffing more pilots and schedulers (ie little/lot hot). Per DJs letter yesterday they have now changed course and are correcting the staffing problem. The system worked and continues to work.
Reply
Old 05-14-2026 | 11:55 AM
  #20  
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,489
Likes: 479
Default

Originally Posted by Verdell
There aren't enough RES pilots (and/or their availability is being throttled), hence GS/QS.

Even when they do have SC available who are legal, they're completely missing them and going to QS. So they're paying M7 and QS, when they could just pay M7 and use a reserve. Their lack of automation is costing them bigly!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
plexing2
United
33
03-25-2020 01:34 PM
mrk771989
Flight Schools and Training
16
02-03-2010 06:47 AM
rightstuffpilot
Major
49
05-08-2009 01:43 PM
TruthSleuth
Major
82
01-16-2009 08:19 AM
freezingflyboy
Piedmont Airlines
20
12-22-2005 09:57 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices