Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Delta interviewees held up by shrink >

Delta interviewees held up by shrink

Search
Notices

Delta interviewees held up by shrink

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-28-2014, 04:00 PM
  #221  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: retired 767(dl)
Posts: 5,730
Default

Originally Posted by tigerd View Post
Horses are my wifes expertise but depending on the dog food vendor you may be right. I forgot to mention my father is a seasoned 777 CA at Delta, and yes thats probably part of the reason why I got the interview. My point is, does the apple far from the tree? I thought I was crazy for a few months.
I know what you mean. I received a "go away letter from DAL in "64." Timbo is your father? No!
badflaps is offline  
Old 09-28-2014, 04:18 PM
  #222  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Posts: 17
Default

Originally Posted by badflaps View Post
I know what you mean. I received a "go away letter from DAL in "64." Timbo is your father? No!
No. But I bet he knows him.
tigerd is offline  
Old 09-29-2014, 08:33 AM
  #223  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Hillbilly's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Position: 7ERA
Posts: 938
Default

Originally Posted by tigerd View Post
I was flagged and subsequently did not pass the "board". I remember the question about "hearing noises at night" or something like that and answered YES. I live on horse property and just prior to my interview my horse was trying to eat dogfood from the back deck and knocked over some chairs in the process. People I talked to said, "thats not what they are asking". I just answered truthfully and it cost me the job. I couldn't believe it. Oh well. I landed my dream job at another Legacy and it could not have worked out better. However, I don't think thats always the case unfortunatelly. I'm not big on this process.
Glad it worked out for you in the end. Did they tell you that question was the singular reason you were not selected or is that a guess? I haven't heard of them ever telling someone specifically why they weren't hired.
Hillbilly is offline  
Old 09-29-2014, 10:16 AM
  #224  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Posts: 136
Default

Originally Posted by L'il J.Seinfeld View Post
Delta's hiring practice sounds like it sucks. UPS's sucks as do those from SWA, FDX...oh wait, they all suck. Every airline has their own unique way of screwing up a system that on the surface appears relatively easy: choose to interview from those resumes exhibiting the desired technical backgrounds and hire the ones that do well in an interview.
Sadly moot, now, but US Airways's interview was a class act. No blatant games were played, and applicants were treated like valued potential assets. I'm no bigger fan of interviews than the next pilot, but it was honestly a pleasure.
HeadInTheTops is offline  
Old 09-29-2014, 11:39 AM
  #225  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,278
Default

Originally Posted by HeadInTheTops View Post
Sadly moot, now, but US Airways's interview was a class act. No blatant games were played, and applicants were treated like valued potential assets. I'm no bigger fan of interviews than the next pilot, but it was honestly a pleasure.
Delta used to do like most airlines and simply let you know a week or so after the interview if you were hired or not. There was no explanation why you were not hired if you did not make the cut. They added a review process and provide more detail and yet most seem to view it as a negative or games. Looks like they should just go back to the old method. Drop the second chance review and mail out the rejection letters.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 09-29-2014, 03:20 PM
  #226  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Posts: 17
Default

Originally Posted by Hillbilly View Post
Glad it worked out for you in the end. Did they tell you that question was the singular reason you were not selected or is that a guess? I haven't heard of them ever telling someone specifically why they weren't hired.
Definitely a guess. They won't tell you, but it's pretty easy to figure it out during the meeting with the shrink.
tigerd is offline  
Old 09-29-2014, 03:37 PM
  #227  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 3
Default

Any idea when the next board will meet? It seems like a lot of folks are being flagged recently; 5 of 10 in one group, and 3 of 9 in another that I know of.
Jet2 is offline  
Old 10-01-2014, 10:03 PM
  #228  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2014
Position: Aeronca Champ
Posts: 30
Default

I have discussed this with many of my retired and current DAL pilots. Obviously the current HR is much different than when I and others were hired (circa 78-79). Personally to meet, greet, and experience my fellow interviewees was a wonderful experience. None of us knew who had "correctly jumped" through the Delta hoops until we met again at our second phase. Presently, if you get through the first day (i.e. passed) you get to have Captain Kraby call you and the other Conditional Job Offers (CJO) by name to enter his office, all while the other pilot interviewees know they are out. Then the CJOs get their letter and photo in front of the Widget. However, (until recently) they do not realize that they may be sent to the Pilot Review Board (PRB) for the spin/holding/hoping pending the MMPI and Shrink. This is HR issue and not coming from the pilot side I believe. Although, now retired, I think the DAL pilots and ALPA need to address this HR issue.

Just my sense.
SHFP is offline  
Old 10-02-2014, 04:40 AM
  #229  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2014
Position: C-17 IP
Posts: 143
Default

I had heard a rumor, just a rumor, that Spirit Airlines at one point administered the MMPI to their entire training department. When at least half their own employees failed it, they decided to do away with it altogether.
SluggoC17 is offline  
Old 10-02-2014, 06:33 AM
  #230  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,522
Default

I don't think you can "fail" the MMPI. It tests for trends and supposedly really tests for consistency in general. Whatever conclusion is deducted from its many results, its just (supposedly) a psychological barometer of many different traits. Its not a "crazy: yes/no" test.
gloopy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
spinproof
Major
13
04-19-2006 07:06 AM
Sir James
Major
0
10-16-2005 09:14 AM
RockBottom
Major
0
09-22-2005 08:09 AM
geshields
Major
2
08-16-2005 03:00 PM
Sir James
Major
0
04-13-2005 10:13 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices