Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-26-2012 | 10:23 AM
  #101581  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: New to mother D
Default

Originally Posted by Whidbey
Just my opinion, but personally I would rather negotiate a little harder now and risk our negotiations extending into Obama's (likely) second term rather than sign a substandard contract that risks entering the mid phase of NMB involvement just as a (IMHO likely) Republican president comes into office.
You're right Whitt, I should have added the caveat "to the extent that we're allowing it to effect our decision."

I'm not supporting a no vote based on any prediction of next year's presidential election and the resultant NMB memebership.

DALPA is putting forward the argument that I should vote YES at least partly based on their prediction of future NMB behavior, behavior which is gleaned from an analysis that has intentionally introduced selection bias, just like the pay increase chart from 2008-2015. As they are putting forward this argument, it is appropriate to analyze its merits. Have ALPA's NMB analyses included the fact that the last major airline strike was approved and executed under a second term democrat?

I'm voting no because this agreement surrenders 70 large regional jets, the work rules do not appreciably improve my quality of life, and the compensation falls well below the dollar amount for which I'm willing to be gone half or more of each month.

Originally Posted by whitt767
Voting No based on your prediction of this years' Presidential election is REALLY foolish.
Agreed. I would however add that it is foolish to vote yes based on fear, as you have permanently signaled your unwillingness to fight for anything more than what is given.

Last edited by Whidbey; 05-26-2012 at 10:38 AM.
Old 05-26-2012 | 10:24 AM
  #101582  
KC10 FATboy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,203
Likes: 53
From: Legacy FO
Default

Engineless 747 Attempts Takeoff ...

Carl??

Old 05-26-2012 | 10:26 AM
  #101583  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by georgetg
Nothing. Brian Bedford is planning on doing just that.


Even better, the TA gives Republic a specific exemption to perform large jet flying by exempting Chautaqua and Shuttle America (wholly owned subsidiaries of Republic) to be exempt from the improved holding company language:


Summary:
  • Our PWA has language to prohibit a DCI carrier to fly large jets.
  • Republic aquires Frontier and operates A320s, orders the C-Series.
  • Many Delta pilot call their reps and say it violates the PWA.
  • The DALPA lawyer responds that the PWA language isn't enforceable as written.
  • My rep promises to make sure the next contract is better.
  • New language in TA prohibits operations like Republic from operating larger jets.
  • Exemption added to TA specifically permits Republic (Chautaqua, Shuttle America) to operate large jets contrary to news language.
Really? This alone in context of BBs plans should be a NO vote!

Cheers
George
George, that is a very compelling argument. I want slow or Alfa to prove it wrong.
Old 05-26-2012 | 10:27 AM
  #101584  
scambo1's Avatar
The Brown Dot +1
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
Default

Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy
Engineless 747 Attempts Takeoff ...

Carl??


If NewK was the FO, they'd have ...
Old 05-26-2012 | 10:28 AM
  #101585  
newKnow's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,844
Likes: 0
From: 765-A
Default

Is there any part of this TA where we as pilots score a flat out WIN without giving part of it away somewhere else?
Old 05-26-2012 | 10:28 AM
  #101586  
Pineapple Guy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,462
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
If you can provide an official defensible source that has officially stated that the 717 pilots are not coming with the planes, I'm all ears.
All right, scambo1. Here's your chance as this one can be determined with absolute certainty. Care to make a $100 wager that ATN pilots do NOT come with those 717s? Yes or No? I'll even give you 2-1 odds on this one.
Old 05-26-2012 | 10:28 AM
  #101587  
whitt767's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: 7ERB
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
zero training cost.

The rest of the cost is integration angst...no money changes hands.
Ok, so how would that happen?

- We get the planes and the pilots and they majically appear on our Seniority list
- They are fenced infinitely so that nobody ever can fly the 717's except the AT pilots (zero training cost)
- They fly using AT Rules (it would cost money to train them to use our FOM, etc)
- They keep the ugly blue/green paint and the giant "a". (it would cost money to paint the aircraft)
- the FAA lets us do this without a separate operating certificate
- blah, blah, blah

I can prove to you that the Sun will rise tomorrow, but I have no legal documents that say that it will happen
Old 05-26-2012 | 10:30 AM
  #101588  
newKnow's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,844
Likes: 0
From: 765-A
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
If NewK was the FO, they'd have ...
I was going to say, CARL don't need no stinkin' engines!
Old 05-26-2012 | 10:30 AM
  #101589  
Jack Bauer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,357
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by georgetg
Nothing. Brian Bedford is planning on doing just that.


Even better, the TA gives Republic a specific exemption to perform large jet flying by exempting Chautaqua and Shuttle America (wholly owned subsidiaries of Republic) to be exempt from the improved holding company language:


Summary:
  • Our PWA has language to prohibit a DCI carrier to fly large jets.
  • Republic aquires Frontier and operates A320s, orders the C-Series.
  • Many Delta pilot call their reps and say it violates the PWA.
  • The DALPA lawyer responds that the PWA language isn't enforceable as written.
  • My rep promises to make sure the next contract is better.
  • New language in TA prohibits operations like Republic from operating larger jets.
  • Exemption added to TA specifically permits Republic (Chautaqua, Shuttle America) to operate large jets contrary to news language.
Really? This alone in context of BBs plans should be a NO vote!

Cheers
George
I just want to say I love the information age. This will be the first contract in history vetted under the watchful eyes of 12,000 plus pilots using google to refresh everyone's memory of who is intending to do what, what past leaders said/mistakes made.

Also using smart phones, ipads, laptops and home computers. The union (who very well may have been duped themselves with slick talking Mr. Campbell) can't say things without having it fact checked in almost real time. The phonies that continue to sell a leaky contract as it is being exposed to be should be ashamed of themselves.
Old 05-26-2012 | 10:31 AM
  #101590  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
All right, scambo1. Here's your chance as this one can be determined with absolute certainty. Care to make a $100 wager that ATN pilots do NOT come with those 717s? Yes or No? I'll even give you 2-1 odds on this one.
The concern is not the likeliness of it but that everyone is silent on the issue.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices