Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?


Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Old 03-10-2013 | 06:18 PM
  #125461  
Free Bird's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
As Bucking Bar so eloquently stated: our ability to perform flying for the Delta brand is our ONLY treasure. And we squandered it in this TA by agreeing to the changes in scope, and the ridiculous claim that we've done something about our JV's and code shares. Couple this with agreeing to further productivity increases, and the stagnation has turned into heavy displacements to lower paying aircraft.

None of our careers will get better until we fight for what is important. And that is our flying of our brand.

Carl
And it really is that simple.
Old 03-10-2013 | 06:29 PM
  #125462  
Purple Drank's Avatar
Straight QOL, homie
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,202
Likes: 1
From: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
This management team is smart. They expect a ROI with everything.
I agree. The bean counters are calling the shots.

Otherwise, we'd have a tablet EFB with wifi, and access to the same up-to-date turbulence and weather radar picture as the guy in seat 2C.

But there's no dollar figure the bean counters can use to justify the expenditure to provide us that type of SA.
Old 03-10-2013 | 06:34 PM
  #125463  
buzzpat's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,070
Likes: 1
From: Urban chicken rancher.
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop
I dont know if 62.5 years is the average age that guys are leaving at or not, but so what? The average was never 60 in the past. The important thing to remember is that the average age just went up about 5 years. So if it is 62.5 then it probably was about 57.5 previously.

Some guys got an instant 5 year windfall. Guys who are FOs get stuck for 5 more years in the right seat, but others were screwed over even worse - like the guys who hit 60 before the change.

And retirements don't help the bottom guys with a shrinking airline.

Scoop
Just wait until ICAO...and then the FAA, go to 67. Popcorn please!!?
Old 03-10-2013 | 06:37 PM
  #125464  
buzzpat's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,070
Likes: 1
From: Urban chicken rancher.
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
None of our careers will get better until we fight for what is important. And that is our flying of our brand.

Carl
And THAT's why I love you Carl! No skin in the game, but the dude abides!

End game, bottom line, done deal. We fly our ****. If not, and until then, we lose.
Old 03-10-2013 | 07:00 PM
  #125465  
Flamer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 3
From: Lowest Pay I Could Find
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
We here very different things. I heard hiring in 2013 not 2012. Never heard a word about a wide body order until 6 weeks ago. The company is doing exactly what they said with the fleet plan. Every aircraft thay said they were bringing on is coming and it now looks like they are bumping the promised numbers up substantially.
We did not get the expected 300 ER's however the 196 we did get are more valuable to the pilot group over time then the 300 expected because of the demographics. You would not be very smart if you wanted to trade what was expected for what actually occurred in the ER program.
*Really? Let's play a game called who said this.

Flight Operations recently announced that they are prepared to begin the pilot hiring process as early as the fourth quarter of this year (2012). This is consistent with the analysis contained in this Touch & Gos.*

A. Company
B. Flight Operations
C. YOUR union

Then claim this wildly inaccurate data had no impact on TA voting? Another REALLY? Everyone should go back and read 12-06 today, then see how you feel about the information and presentation.
Old 03-10-2013 | 07:04 PM
  #125466  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
They actually put out in a earlier message they expected to award AE's on the nine in this bid. That changed by parking them early.
No, they did not. It has always been stated that this bid the plan was to close the DC-9 categories.

Perhaps there were some discussions behind the scenes, but the only statements put out in crew planning memos in regard to the plan for this AE was to close the DC-9 categories.
Old 03-10-2013 | 07:07 PM
  #125467  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by buzzpat
Just wait until ICAO...and then the FAA, go to 67. Popcorn please!!?
I just threw up in my mouth a little.


The good thing is I highly doubt that is going to happen- at least any time in the near future.
Old 03-10-2013 | 07:27 PM
  #125468  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
We here very different things. I heard hiring in 2013 not 2012.
Sailing,

Sir, you must have forgotten. No biggie ... Google search makes recalling pretty easy ....

Originally Posted by Capt. Steve Dickson
Now let me take a moment to hit on one point – aircraft orders - from the plan I just mentioned and how it ties into the Tentative Agreement before you. .... barring an economic downturn or other unanticipated event, we could begin the hiring process as early as the last quarter of this year.

Well, that’s it for this week. ...
Economy has done better than most anticipated and we gave them the relief to purchase more 76 seaters, which they quickly did, along with the purchase of the airline that operates them ...

http://www.nycaviation.com/2012/12/d.../#.UT1P8Bza83M

The only part they did not execute on ... hiring. Were we promised an end to stagnation & displacements if we voted yes ? .. nope. Was hiring inferred by management's statements ... definitely.
Old 03-10-2013 | 07:31 PM
  #125469  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
I know exactly what your career has turned into daldude, and I'm one of those fairly senior guys. I pounded this keyboard like a maniac trying to warn guys in your seniority not to bite at this TA. As Bucking Bar so eloquently stated: our ability to perform flying for the Delta brand is our ONLY treasure. And we squandered it in this TA by agreeing to the changes in scope, and the ridiculous claim that we've done something about our JV's and code shares. Couple this with agreeing to further productivity increases, and the stagnation has turned into heavy displacements to lower paying aircraft.

None of our careers will get better until we fight for what is important. And that is our flying of our brand.

Carl

This and daldudes posts pretty much sums it up for me.....
Old 03-10-2013 | 07:34 PM
  #125470  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Purple Drank
Otherwise, we'd have a tablet EFB with wifi, and access to the same up-to-date turbulence and weather radar picture as the guy in seat 2C.
Or as any newish Cessna 172 single-engine piston aircraft.....
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices