Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search
Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-15-2009, 06:30 AM
  #14601  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by brakechatter View Post
It certainly does appear as if a stage is being set, doesn't it?!?
It does, and depending on how it is agreed to in principle, it could very well be good for us. I would like the investment in JAL to be above 25% due to the triggers in Section 1 E.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 09-15-2009, 06:32 AM
  #14602  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29 View Post
It appears from this statement that our pilot group would benefit from this, BUT we would still need to look over any agreement very thoroughly.
I would assume that if we enter in to this arrangement, we would not compete on the same routes. The has to be a quid pro quo for DAL to do this. JAL wants the benefits of the Skyteam. They want the European connection with AF.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 09-15-2009, 06:41 AM
  #14603  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by RockyBoy View Post
True, but when the shares were given to ALPA the price was 8.99 so really we have just broke even.
I thought it was $7.99 @ distribution.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 09-15-2009, 06:52 AM
  #14604  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29 View Post
I thought it was $7.99 @ distribution.
From JEDC 09-03

On the Company pay statements, DPSP/RSP and taxable ordinary income distributions are shown in dollars, not shares, based on end‐of‐day DAL share valuations.

Distributions made to the DPSP/RSP were valued based on the closing share price of DAL stock on March 3, 2009 which was $4.26 per share.

Distributions made as taxable ordinary income were valued based on the closing share price of DAL stock on March 4, 2009 which was $4.46 per share.


If you want to look at this further go to the DALPA site, select library, select MEC, select Committees, selects JEDC, then look at the memos there. This one is the JEDC 09-03 memo.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 09-15-2009, 06:54 AM
  #14605  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Stock up to 8.995.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 09-15-2009, 07:05 AM
  #14606  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Hawaii50's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: 757 Left
Posts: 1,306
Default

[quote=newKnow;678729]


Text of Sam's speech:

Cob: Crew present and accounted for, Sir!

Sam : Little ducks, there's trouble in Fargo. So they called us. And we're going over there and bringing the most durable flying machine ever devised. We're capable of flying more legs than has ever been conceived of in the history of scheduled air service. For one purpose alone: Keep our airline safe.

Sam: On the way your going to get wet because it's raining outside, a little sticky because we're going to deice, we're going to have random stick shaker operation at 500 feet, a dual presurization failure, and three pounds of baby sheet blue crap are going to fall off the glareshield, but don't worry about any of that, just keep your pubs away from the windows. This is one durable machine.
Hawaii50 is offline  
Old 09-15-2009, 07:09 AM
  #14607  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 11,993
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot View Post
It does, and depending on how it is agreed to in principle, it could very well be good for us. I would like the investment in JAL to be above 25% due to the triggers in Section 1 E.
Here's "Cranky Flyer's" take, which I agree with.

I'd bet Delta will transfer out of the flying it is losing money on. A strategy which has been repeated again, and again, and again with DCI, Air France/KLM, and recently Alaska and MidEx. We have not seen NWA's network "rationalized" Delta style. Deep down, I believe Delta's management realizes the airline business is a lousy business to be in and figures, "let others be in that business. We'll sell tickets and make an easy, no risk, fee."

Not to be doom & gloom, I'm just pointing out that "Delta performing Delta Flying" would be a trend reversal. Further, I find it unlikely that Japan's politicians would be pushing a deal which would outsource work done by Japan's traditional flag carrier.

Delta inherited its Tokyo hub from Northwest, and it actually has a decent intra-Asian operation from Tokyo – a legacy from the end of World War II. As they say, to the winner go the spoils. There’s even a subfleet of narrowbodies based in Tokyo to fly some these routes. My guess is that these routes absolutely suck wind right now. If Delta is really losing a ton of money as I suspect, they could eliminate all those routes and either use the slots to fly to the US or transfer them to JAL. The additional connectivity in Tokyo that they could gain from this link-up would add a bunch more traffic to feed all that US-Tokyo flying Delta does now. (You people in Portland could breathe a sigh of relief, because this could probably help that flight come off the edge of the cliff.)
This move could make a big, immediate difference on the bottom line. If Delta can pour some money in but get it back out very quickly in the form of improved profits, then it’s a no-brainer. Everyone in SkyTeam wins . . . except for Korean. Poor Korean would be demoted to second place in the North Pacific, and it would likely very seriously look at defecting to oneworld where it could take JAL’s place as top dog in the region (or only dog, as the case may be).
Of course, if JAL leaves, oneworld loses, so American has now come back with its plan to invest in JAL. American is pitching it as a strengthening of its partnership that has been in place for years. The airline would set up a joint venture similar to what we’ve seen over the Atlantic with the likes of United and Lufthansa, KLM and Northwest, etc. In other words, they’d split the revenues on flights between the US and Japan.
All this info is coming from magical “sources” and nothing has been confirmed, so we don’t really know any details about what’s being proposed here. There are also rumors that Air France/KLM is in the running, and that would be good news for Delta. Air France and JAL have actually had a legacy codeshare and frequent flier partnership that crosses alliance boundaries. It has strengthened in recent years, so this would add some more credibility to the Delta bid.
As I wrote years ago, Narita isn't an asset. The LR versions of the 777 made "technical stops" like Narita as useless as Keflavik, or dare I say Anchorage. Back then folks got mad at me and claimed I was NWA bashing. Now you can call it "Delta bashing" if you must, and I love Delta. It is what it is.

IMHO Delta is looking for a way out, while still hoping to capture some of the revenue they are leaving on the table.

Now about that China route authority... In the future Narita is just going to be a position report.

Last edited by Bucking Bar; 09-15-2009 at 07:22 AM.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 09-15-2009, 07:14 AM
  #14608  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Bar; that is why as I stated, a JV may have some serious issues that we as pilots may need to fight against, but a 25.000001% stake in JAL or any foreign airline has some protections. Got read the PWA Section 1 Sub-part E


BTW welcome back from the world of the working
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 09-15-2009, 07:28 AM
  #14609  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 11,993
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot View Post
Bar; that is why as I stated, a JV may have some serious issues that we as pilots may need to fight against, but a 25.000001% stake in JAL or any foreign airline has some protections. Got read the PWA Section 1 Sub-part E


BTW welcome back from the world of the working
Thanks and true. But nothing about this suggests M O R E flying and as George Costanza well knows, shrinkage is shrinkage - regardless of the explanation.

On a personal note - why do I keep getting in the airline business with people who don't want to be in the airline business? In some ironic ways I admire folks like Brian Bedford. When business gave him lemons, he made lemonaid. Then he discovered Doug Parker's Vodka and had himself a party.*

(joke paraphrased from Ron White)
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 09-15-2009, 07:38 AM
  #14610  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar View Post
Thanks and true. But nothing about this suggests M O R E flying and as George Costanza well knows, shrinkage is shrinkage - regardless of the explanation.

On a personal note - why do I keep getting in the airline business with people who don't want to be in the airline business? In some ironic ways I admire folks like Brian Bedford. When business gave him lemons, he made lemonaid. Then he discovered Doug Parker's Vodka and had himself a party.*

(joke paraphrased from Ron White)
I agree, that it may be counter intuitive for Delta to invest in a direct competitor in an area that we now have a great influence, but if it gives us access and coverage, with the adoption of Open Skies, it is a smart move.

Like I said, DAL better get something for half a billion bucks and it better work to our favor!

I agree, about the last comment, I wonder that at times to.
acl65pilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices