Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

The presentation and argument starts with my White House years (Dereliction of Duty) and moves forward from there. I think I'll be clearer if you read chronologically. They do build on themselves.
Runs with scissors
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,847
Likes: 0
From: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .

(glad I finished mine last week!)
Runs with scissors
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,847
Likes: 0
From: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Boy I'm glad the Vikings are making the Patriots look good tonight!
Well, it's not exactly the Harry Potter series but I did have the #2 best seller to Rowling for quite awhile. Never could unseat Harry. 
The presentation and argument starts with my White House years (Dereliction of Duty) and moves forward from there. I think I'll be clearer if you read chronologically. They do build on themselves.

The presentation and argument starts with my White House years (Dereliction of Duty) and moves forward from there. I think I'll be clearer if you read chronologically. They do build on themselves.
Are you saying you built your case against Obama based on what a previous President did?

I'm going to start looking over it, right now….
I can eagerly agree with the many ways that Republicans have failed to live up to expectations. Why is it so hard for Democrats? I conclude that liberalism is more about emotion.
Runs with scissors
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,847
Likes: 0
From: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
No, I build my case on personal experiences, ideology, and results. One that works and one that fails. Surely you can't be defending our current president? I get the Chicago thing but, if so, you'd be in the minority. Most definitely with the military/former military crowd.
I can eagerly agree with the many ways that Republicans have failed to live up to expectations. Why is it so hard for Democrats? I conclude that liberalism is more about emotion.
I can eagerly agree with the many ways that Republicans have failed to live up to expectations. Why is it so hard for Democrats? I conclude that liberalism is more about emotion.
Because of that, I can defend just about every President (there are some exceptions.)
Political party doesn't really matter to history. So, for those who cling to them now, and base their decisions and votes based on who has a D, or an R next to their name, either way, it's still about emotion.
It's exactly why Huntsman didn't win the Republican nomination and his pretty daughter isn't First Daughter -- or whatever she would be called. Emotion.
Conservatism, liberalism, and emotion? It flows both ways.
History will tell you though, that it's usually compromise, somewhere down the middle of the road, that keeps this country moving forward.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,707
Likes: 0
From: Permanently scarred
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





