Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?


Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Old 12-27-2009 | 07:00 AM
  #22271  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
ACL, could we staff a GUM base with 12 day trips from current bases like LAX and ATL?
DAL sees that as a costly short term solution that may be used if they do not think it will be a long standing op.
Old 12-27-2009 | 07:02 AM
  #22272  
Ferd149's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,457
Likes: 0
From: LAX ERA
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
Ya know Ferd, I was told that, and then talking with a few guys last week they seemed to "Know" that they would be staying there. They work over there and thought that this 73N flying was add-on flying.

In the end it is anyone's guess, but I just wanted to point out that there was a differing voice on this.
Sure hope that is how it works out.....I'm basing my AE/MD bid on it, ie staying in MSP for the time being.

Ferd
Old 12-27-2009 | 07:17 AM
  #22273  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

With this being the start of the storm, I would not AE anything unless it is where you want to be not matter what happens.
Old 12-27-2009 | 07:23 AM
  #22274  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

So I guess a short term solution to GUM that would allow fluidity would of course be 12 day state side trips possibly augmented by a very small GUM base?

And let me ask this, I haven't paid attention to the 755 category but is the plan still to have 76ERs in MSP and DTW flying to Asia and then the crews flying 757s while there? Thus no deadheading.
Old 12-27-2009 | 07:24 AM
  #22275  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Without information, other than ACL's, how do we do that? A guy who bids a 737 could be in Asia. The ER pilot who bids to go to Asia will just as likely be doing overnights in Fort Lauderdale.

Of course, there is only one way to get the Jackson Mississippi overnights. That's where I'm headed.
Old 12-27-2009 | 07:30 AM
  #22276  
Ferd149's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,457
Likes: 0
From: LAX ERA
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
So I guess a short term solution to GUM that would allow fluidity would of course be 12 day state side trips possibly augmented by a very small GUM base?

And let me ask this, I haven't paid attention to the 755 category but is the plan still to have 76ERs in MSP and DTW flying to Asia and then the crews flying 757s while there? Thus no deadheading.
I understand that is the "goal". But, most of us think there is still too much south flying to have non-deadheads cover it. I think, if they are able to do it, it would result in shorter (6 maybe 9?) day trips. Also, I forget but isn't there a 35 in 7 rule for international? So no long trip with a PDX > NRT > BKK > NRT > PDX in it somewhere.
Old 12-27-2009 | 07:32 AM
  #22277  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Bar, and that is the way it is designed. We do not know what base will be doing the flying one month to the next. It happens on a day to day basis on some flights. They will have the base that has the staffing and who can do it most efficiently do a given flight. Computers has made it so that they can change this on a day to day basis. I do not think that we could get certain bases to do certain flights.
Old 12-27-2009 | 07:42 AM
  #22278  
newKnow's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,844
Likes: 0
From: 765-A
Default

Originally Posted by Ferd149
Scambo,


I like Saipan for the beautiful island, the history (big WWII battle field) and everyplace I like to eat and drink is within walking distance. Not so much Guam. Plus, it's the closest place and it used to have the longest layovers (but not now, maybe it will go back if we get the increased service back).


Other Saipan stuff I'll leave to PMs

Ferd

PS May be all a moot point if the 737s come out with or without a Guam base.
Saipan is waaay cheaper than Guam, too. At least it was when I was doing that stuff. (It was my favorite flying at NWA)
Old 12-27-2009 | 07:51 AM
  #22279  
dragon's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,601
Likes: 0
From: Dismayed
Default

What does this talk of a GUM base mean vis-a-vis the JAL deal. Thought this was the backup plan if we couldn't lure JAL away.

Last I saw from the Japanese newspapers was JAL was going to side with us so would that mean we're going to expand further into Asia.
Old 12-27-2009 | 07:51 AM
  #22280  
newKnow's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,844
Likes: 0
From: 765-A
Default

ACL,

So you are saying that if they do Guam, it's still up in the air whether or not there is going to be a real base in Guam (As in we can bid GUM 73N A or B) or if mainline bases will be taking temporary duty there, or mainline bases flying 12 day trips and DH'ing to get there?

Does the union have to sign off on any of the above options?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices