|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1912289)
The numbers are very simple. AMR and UAL have a 3% raise on 1 Jan each year. We would receive a 3% raise each year if the other employees get a raise. The company could however give out the raise for next year on 31 Dec 15 and it would not trigger a raise for us.
///////// If, during any consecutive rolling 18-month period, the Company grants an across-the- board increase in base pay rates to non-pilot U.S.-based workgroups covering 30% or more of its non-pilot U.S.-based workforce, then a review of pilot composite hourly rates will be triggered. ///////// 2 things to look at: 1. trigger to review pilot pay rates (other employee raises) 2. if triggered, how much do we raise pilot rates? (match lower of employee raises or UAL/AMR raise using contract formula). Does anyone really think the company can sit back in record profits and not give any of its employee groups a raise? The company needs to give raises to the FA to entice them not to unionize; at least, that's what they've done in the past. (Whether the FA vote to unionize is up to them; I'm just saying management has typically sweetened things for non-union employees whenever it looked like it was getting close to unionize, and the FA union is gearing up for next spring). 3.B.4. was included in C2012 as a protection in case we didn't get a new contract on the amendable date for whatever reason. Compare 8/.26/3/3 with new scope, sick leave and work rule changes to 3/3/3/3 under current contract. Sure, 3/3/3/3 is not guaranteed, but it's very unlikely to go 0/0/0/0. |
Originally Posted by BobZ
(Post 1912417)
We used to get 7 weeks. The non contracts was unilaterally restored post bk...and when we asked about the stated 'intent' on the part of the company to include pilots in any vacation restoration....... we were told "a contract is a contract".
Our recovery was NOT a no cost restoration as with the non contract....it came at a cost that was incorporated in the balance of our pwa......as clearly illustrated when dalpa always asks....."what are you willing to give up to get that". |
1 Attachment(s)
Bender heres some PS math that was done by a fellow facebooker... see the picture for the table with the pay comparison...
"The PTIX for 2014 was $6.75B which resulted in a PS pool for all employees of $1.1B This level of PS netted each employee a payment of 16.58% of income. Under the terms of the TA, the PS pool would have been reduced by $350M due to the new trigger and another reduction of $46M due to the new definition of PTIX, resulting in a total PS payout of $704M. End result: each employee would have received 36% less in their payout - 10.61% of income instead of 16.58%. Chart Assumptions: - Pay Rates per TA, 12-year 737 Captain - “Income” = (Pay Rate) * (1,000) — Per PWA Section 3.A.1, PS is based on annual income not including bonuses, profit sharing, shared rewards, or expenses. - DL total annual payroll unchanged - All PS payouts based on 2014 PTIX*** ***Note: Both Richard Anderson and Ed Bastian have publicly stated they expect DL profits to be as good as or better than 2014 in years 2015 and beyond, hence assumption is not unrealistic. Conclusion: The proposed changes to Profit Sharing are a bad deal for all Delta pilots. A really bad deal." |
Originally Posted by BobZ
(Post 1912430)
Bender.......agreed. Would like to see new hires atart with more vacation time....and have it worth more per day
? Is......what are you willing to give up to get that! haha! |
Originally Posted by ghilis101
(Post 1912741)
Bender heres some PS math that was done by a fellow facebooker... see the picture for the table with the pay comparison...
"The PTIX for 2014 was $6.75B which resulted in a PS pool for all employees of $1.1B This level of PS netted each employee a payment of 16.58% of income. Under the terms of the TA, the PS pool would have been reduced by $350M due to the new trigger and another reduction of $46M due to the new definition of PTIX, resulting in a total PS payout of $704M. End result: each employee would have received 36% less in their payout - 10.61% of income instead of 16.58%. Chart Assumptions: - Pay Rates per TA, 12-year 737 Captain - “Income” = (Pay Rate) * (1,000) — Per PWA Section 3.A.1, PS is based on annual income not including bonuses, profit sharing, shared rewards, or expenses. - DL total annual payroll unchanged - All PS payouts based on 2014 PTIX*** ***Note: Both Richard Anderson and Ed Bastian have publicly stated they expect DL profits to be as good as or better than 2014 in years 2015 and beyond, hence assumption is not unrealistic. Conclusion: The proposed changes to Profit Sharing are a bad deal for all Delta pilots. A really bad deal." |
Great information, thanks. I have been emailing my reps quite a bit about the lack of information being given out on this topic.
Originally Posted by PigeonF16
(Post 1912432)
31 Dec 2015 would still trigger a raise. It's any time during a rolling 18-month period. Here's the cut and paste from 3.B.4.
///////// If, during any consecutive rolling 18-month period, the Company grants an across-the- board increase in base pay rates to non-pilot U.S.-based workgroups covering 30% or more of its non-pilot U.S.-based workforce, then a review of pilot composite hourly rates will be triggered. ///////// 2 things to look at: 1. trigger to review pilot pay rates (other employee raises) 2. if triggered, how much do we raise pilot rates? (match lower of employee raises or UAL/AMR raise using contract formula). Does anyone really think the company can sit back in record profits and not give any of its employee groups a raise? The company needs to give raises to the FA to entice them not to unionize; at least, that's what they've done in the past. (Whether the FA vote to unionize is up to them; I'm just saying management has typically sweetened things for non-union employees whenever it looked like it was getting close to unionize, and the FA union is gearing up for next spring). 3.B.4. was included in C2012 as a protection in case we didn't get a new contract on the amendable date for whatever reason. Compare 8/.26/3/3 with new scope, sick leave and work rule changes to 3/3/3/3 under current contract. Sure, 3/3/3/3 is not guaranteed, but it's very unlikely to go 0/0/0/0. |
Originally Posted by ghilis101
(Post 1912741)
Bender heres some PS math that was done by a fellow facebooker... see the picture for the table with the pay comparison...
"The PTIX for 2014 was $6.75B which resulted in a PS pool for all employees of $1.1B This level of PS netted each employee a payment of 16.58% of income. Under the terms of the TA, the PS pool would have been reduced by $350M due to the new trigger and another reduction of $46M due to the new definition of PTIX, resulting in a total PS payout of $704M. End result: each employee would have received 36% less in their payout - 10.61% of income instead of 16.58%. Chart Assumptions: - Pay Rates per TA, 12-year 737 Captain - “Income” = (Pay Rate) * (1,000) — Per PWA Section 3.A.1, PS is based on annual income not including bonuses, profit sharing, shared rewards, or expenses. - DL total annual payroll unchanged - All PS payouts based on 2014 PTIX*** ***Note: Both Richard Anderson and Ed Bastian have publicly stated they expect DL profits to be as good as or better than 2014 in years 2015 and beyond, hence assumption is not unrealistic. Conclusion: The proposed changes to Profit Sharing are a bad deal for all Delta pilots. A really bad deal." |
You do realize that if RA and Sleepy Ed lie about stuff like that, the SEC will file felony charges against them, right?
|
Originally Posted by Woofers
(Post 1912831)
Your conclusion relies on three major tenants: First, you take what Richard Anderson says as the gospel. Second, you take what Ed Bastain says as the gospel. Third, that Delta will remain profitable for the next three years. Really? You believe all three? Awesome. I have some great Florida property that I would like you to invest in. No , you don't have to look at it. Just trust me.
Tenets, they're different from tenants, but only slightly. Heiko would disagree with your contention too. But, don't let that get in the way of your SEC lawsuit against the Delta management head shed. |
Originally Posted by Woofers
(Post 1912831)
Your conclusion relies on three major tenants: First, you take what Richard Anderson says as the gospel. Second, you take what Ed Bastain says as the gospel. Third, that Delta will remain profitable for the next three years. Really? You believe all three? Awesome. I have some great Florida property that I would like you to invest in. No , you don't have to look at it. Just trust me.
Carl |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:51 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands