Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
All things - Profit Sharing >

All things - Profit Sharing

Notices

All things - Profit Sharing

Old 07-09-2015, 07:12 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 503
Default All things - Profit Sharing

Outsider looking in...

We all know DAL will make lots-o-profits in the years to come ( as of today, anyway). If your TA gets voted down, you keep your current profit sharing formula? What stops RA from using/ hiding that profit in the future to "stick it to you"? Any oversight?

Lordy knows all my previous companies have used/ bought/ built/ invested in questionable ideas to "use" profits...

1) Reuters/Delta Air Lines Inc (DAL.N) is hoping to strengthen partnerships with carriers in South Korea, Mexico and Brazil, and it has been approached about investing in Japan's bankrupt Skymark Airlines, Delta's president Ed Bastian told reporters Monday.

2) training centers
3) buying regional/ global airlines
4) buying hotels
5) etc

( not an ad for a yes vote in any way, good luck)
Rabid Seagull is offline  
Old 07-09-2015, 07:17 AM
  #2  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Originally Posted by Rabid Seagull View Post
Outsider looking in...

We all know DAL will make lots-o-profits in the years to come ( as of today, anyway). If your TA gets voted down, you keep your current profit sharing formula? What stops RA from using/ hiding that profit in the future to "stick it to you"? Any oversight?

Lordy knows all my previous companies have used/ bought/ built/ invested in questionable ideas to "use" profits...

1) Reuters/Delta Air Lines Inc (DAL.N) is hoping to strengthen partnerships with carriers in South Korea, Mexico and Brazil, and it has been approached about investing in Japan's bankrupt Skymark Airlines, Delta's president Ed Bastian told reporters Monday.

2) training centers
3) buying regional/ global airlines
4) buying hotels
5) etc

( not an ad for a yes vote in any way, good luck)
I don't have excel on my ipad so this is a copy paste. I hope it pastes properly. It uses DALPA profit projections and compares profit sharing using c12 vs TA15, again using forecast numbers.

https://onedrive.live.com/view.aspx?...FkQEETOrKDbpiM
scambo1 is offline  
Old 07-09-2015, 07:23 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Default

Originally Posted by Rabid Seagull View Post
Outsider looking in...

We all know DAL will make lots-o-profits in the years to come ( as of today, anyway). If your TA gets voted down, you keep your current profit sharing formula? What stops RA from using/ hiding that profit in the future to "stick it to you"? Any oversight?

Lordy knows all my previous companies have used/ bought/ built/ invested in questionable ideas to "use" profits...

1) Reuters/Delta Air Lines Inc (DAL.N) is hoping to strengthen partnerships with carriers in South Korea, Mexico and Brazil, and it has been approached about investing in Japan's bankrupt Skymark Airlines, Delta's president Ed Bastian told reporters Monday.

2) training centers
3) buying regional/ global airlines
4) buying hotels
5) etc

( not an ad for a yes vote in any way, good luck)
There is no way around the profit sharing. No way to reduce it.
gzsg is offline  
Old 07-09-2015, 08:04 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,184
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg View Post
There is no way around the profit sharing. No way to reduce it.

Other than not making the projected profit, I think you are right. An election of Cankles in 2016 will probably do it though.
BenderRodriguez is offline  
Old 07-09-2015, 08:09 AM
  #5  
La Familia Delta
 
ghilis101's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B-717 FO / C-17 AC
Posts: 2,467
Default

Originally Posted by Rabid Seagull View Post
Outsider looking in...

We all know DAL will make lots-o-profits in the years to come ( as of today, anyway). If your TA gets voted down, you keep your current profit sharing formula? What stops RA from using/ hiding that profit in the future to "stick it to you"? Any oversight?

Lordy knows all my previous companies have used/ bought/ built/ invested in questionable ideas to "use" profits...

1) Reuters/Delta Air Lines Inc (DAL.N) is hoping to strengthen partnerships with carriers in South Korea, Mexico and Brazil, and it has been approached about investing in Japan's bankrupt Skymark Airlines, Delta's president Ed Bastian told reporters Monday.

2) training centers
3) buying regional/ global airlines
4) buying hotels
5) etc

( not an ad for a yes vote in any way, good luck)
Delta has a "too much cash" problem. They've already been trying to balance it as best they can by accelerating debt repayments and then of course, the recent $5 Billion stock buyback. All of this is positioning to drive the stock price up to its $60 target estimate. If they want to spite the pilots they in theory could take on more debt but RA is a business man. His equity in the company is worth way more than ours. He would only be driving down his own payout when he retires if they purposely miss estimates and tank the stock price.
ghilis101 is offline  
Old 07-09-2015, 08:16 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: retired 767(dl)
Posts: 5,723
Default

Originally Posted by BenderRodriguez View Post
Other than not making the projected profit, I think you are right. An election of Cankles in 2016 will probably do it though.
Howsa'bout giving Cankles free parts and labor on her whale for four years.
badflaps is offline  
Old 07-09-2015, 08:17 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,184
Default

Originally Posted by ghilis101 View Post
Delta has a "too much cash" problem. They've already been trying to balance it as best they can by accelerating debt repayments and then of course, the recent $5 Billion stock buyback. All of this is positioning to drive the stock price up to its $60 target estimate. If they want to spite the pilots they in theory could take on more debt but RA is a business man. His equity in the company is worth way more than ours. He would only be driving down his own payout when he retires if they purposely miss estimates and tank the stock price.
I think you way overestimate our importance in the big picture. And I also thin you are way overzealous in your painting his actions vis-a-vis the pilot group. We are just a piece in a very big puzzle. He probably doesn't spend 15 minutes a day thinking us. And I guarantee you that those minutes are not spent thinking about how to screw us.
BenderRodriguez is offline  
Old 07-09-2015, 08:20 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: retired 767(dl)
Posts: 5,723
Default

Originally Posted by BenderRodriguez View Post
I think you way overestimate our importance in the big picture. And I also thin you are way overzealous in your painting his actions vis-a-vis the pilot group. We are just a piece in a very big puzzle. He probably doesn't spend 15 minutes a day thinking us. And I guarantee you that those minutes are not spent thinking about how to screw us.
His thoughts are mostly of the weenie Capt. that parked in his space.
badflaps is offline  
Old 07-09-2015, 08:21 AM
  #9  
La Familia Delta
 
ghilis101's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B-717 FO / C-17 AC
Posts: 2,467
Default

Originally Posted by BenderRodriguez View Post
I think you way overestimate our importance in the big picture. And I also thin you are way overzealous in your painting his actions vis-a-vis the pilot group. We are just a piece in a very big puzzle. He probably doesn't spend 15 minutes a day thinking us. And I guarantee you that those minutes are not spent thinking about how to screw us.
no that's what Im saying. We agree for a change. Im saying RA wouldn't purposely drive company PTIX down just to spite the pilots. Hes a business man. He has a company to run, and he has estimates to meet or exceed.

btw Bender that's exactly why we believe voting no will get us another offer. Its just a business interaction. He doesn't personally spend time trying to screw us. Hes just playing his role very much by the book. But we should also use the playbook too. We should send the TA back and negotiate TA2. That's just business.
ghilis101 is offline  
Old 07-09-2015, 08:37 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,184
Default

Originally Posted by ghilis101 View Post
no that's what Im saying. We agree for a change. Im saying RA wouldn't purposely drive company PTIX down just to spite the pilots. Hes a business man. He has a company to run, and he has estimates to meet or exceed.

btw Bender that's exactly why we believe voting no will get us another offer. Its just a business interaction. He doesn't personally spend time trying to screw us. Hes just playing his role very much by the book. But we should also use the playbook too. We should send the TA back and negotiate TA2. That's just business.
Well it's silly to say that voting no would NOT get us another offer, and I don't think anybody is saying that. The chess game is whether you believe the next offer will be better and why it would. And as many on here like to say, "Anderson is playing chess and we are playing checkers". Let's see some of that Kasparov insight. You seem convinced it will be a better deal. So, convince me without hyperbole and conjecture.

And he is not playing the airline CEO by the book. Not even close.

P-KB4
BenderRodriguez is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jsled
United
206
02-18-2015 12:26 AM
morecowbell
American
122
10-05-2014 09:50 AM
Moombabeach
United
16
01-01-2014 06:37 AM
alfaromeo
Major
132
01-24-2011 09:48 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices