Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
My personal mins for the TA >

My personal mins for the TA

Search
Notices

My personal mins for the TA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-29-2016, 02:15 PM
  #11  
Super Moderator
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 6,870
Default

Originally Posted by WhatNow View Post
He said he wanted 1 to 2% above UAL rates and believed that number to be 20%. It's not.


OK but the TA was a pitiful 15% after the PS trade. The market for Pilots is increasing rapidly. I assume you are aware of what Allegiant just got.

Scoop
Scoop is offline  
Old 06-29-2016, 02:19 PM
  #12  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 430
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop View Post
OK but the TA was a pitiful 15% after the PS trade. The market for Pilots is increasing rapidly. I assume you are aware of what Allegiant just got.

Scoop
216 an hour for the minibus and mad dog and really crappy everything else, work rules, PS, sick, vacation ect...
WhatNow is offline  
Old 06-29-2016, 02:22 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: Power top
Posts: 2,959
Default

Originally Posted by WhatNow View Post
The dollar cost of the failed TA will be a factor regardless of your feelings on the issue. It's interesting to see pilot positions dropping so much lately on a new TA. 1 to 2% above UAL is well below what I want and again less overall cost then the failed TA. The company would be happy with that.
How'd you you know I was talking about you? No one's dropping anything but the last regime of appeasers. The new TA will be vastly superior or it will be voted down. One guarantee, JM won't dismiss the pilots as misinformed, ignorant or rocket surgeons. Your buddies lack of respect for the pilot group got them voted out. Live with it.
Hank Kingsley is offline  
Old 06-29-2016, 02:27 PM
  #14  
Super Moderator
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 6,870
Default

Originally Posted by WhatNow View Post
216 an hour for the minibus and mad dog and really crappy everything else, work rules, PS, sick, vacation ect...

I guess you are overlooking the 40% pay raise in a single contract cycle.

What is your point?

I give up. The 65% that voted no are fools - we should have accepted the TA and have been thankful.

You can not admit the TA was crap can you? Do you actually hope we get another sub-standard TA so you can say "I told you so?" Because if your goal is a much better TA you have a strange way of showing it.

Scoop
Scoop is offline  
Old 06-29-2016, 02:29 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Posts: 111
Default

United pay scale is17.5% better than my current A320 rate. 3rd year FO
mesaba13 is offline  
Old 06-29-2016, 02:30 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
capncrunch's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,324
Default

Originally Posted by WhatNow View Post
He said he wanted 1 to 2% above UAL rates and believed that number to be 20%. It's not.
I see that everything else he mentioned you failed to address. Not surprising, it ruins your point.

[IMG]via Imgflip Meme Generator[/IMG]
capncrunch is offline  
Old 06-29-2016, 04:29 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Posts: 187
Default

Originally Posted by Cogf16 View Post
Really just some personal thoughts...

-United rates on ALL jets + a percent or 2. AND NO, NOT PAYING FOR IT WITH PS, OR USING TOTAL COMP AS THE METRIC!!!(Because of their paybanding, will that create "unequal" increases and do you think we are discussing banding also?
-Real improvements in per diem, training/vacation day pay.
-Will accept minor "adjustments" to company "needs" ie sick, bidding, alv etc. Certainly not on the scale of TA15. Our advances must dwarf any company "gets"
-If company wants PS changes, it must be done outside of UA rates and be a real winner for us.

Bottom line is we will never accept a TA that doesn't exceed United BOOKRATES AT SIGNING OR AT ANY POINT IN THE CONTRACT. CERTAINLY THE COMPANY KNOWS THIS AND IS PREPARED TO NEGOTIATE WITH THIS REALITY?!?!? I know we can't cherrypick and we must look at the TA in its totality, but clearly we must be industry leading in most of the important areas of workrules, benefits, etc. Based on my first statement above, we need close to 20% at signing and then 4 to 5% minimum per year. And the other stuff as well. Thoughts???

Don't forget international scope. If we give the company any concessions in this area, I will be very hard pressed to vote yes.
Dat jet is offline  
Old 06-29-2016, 04:30 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Flamer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Position: Lowest Pay I Could Find
Posts: 1,044
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop View Post
OK but the TA was a pitiful 15% after the PS trade. The market for Pilots is increasing rapidly. I assume you are aware of what Allegiant just got.

Scoop
My mins go up a little. Every day. Not kidding.
Flamer is offline  
Old 06-29-2016, 04:40 PM
  #19  
Sick of whiners
 
KnotSoFast's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Position: 767 VEOP
Posts: 507
Default

Originally Posted by Cogf16 View Post
Really just some personal thoughts...

-United rates on ALL jets + a percent or 2. AND NO, NOT PAYING FOR IT WITH PS, OR USING TOTAL COMP AS THE METRIC!!!(Because of their paybanding, will that create "unequal" increases and do you think we are discussing banding also?
-Real improvements in per diem, training/vacation day pay.
-Will accept minor "adjustments" to company "needs" ie sick, bidding, alv etc. Certainly not on the scale of TA15. Our advances must dwarf any company "gets"
-If company wants PS changes, it must be done outside of UA rates and be a real winner for us.

Bottom line is we will never accept a TA that doesn't exceed United BOOKRATES AT SIGNING OR AT ANY POINT IN THE CONTRACT. CERTAINLY THE COMPANY KNOWS THIS AND IS PREPARED TO NEGOTIATE WITH THIS REALITY?!?!? I know we can't cherrypick and we must look at the TA in its totality, but clearly we must be industry leading in most of the important areas of workrules, benefits, etc. Based on my first statement above, we need close to 20% at signing and then 4 to 5% minimum per year. And the other stuff as well.
Thoughts???

I think I will wait until a TA is actually reached and published before I go chest thumping about my absolute minimums. The TA will be hundreds of pages long. For my vote, I plan on reading the whole thing, THEN deciding yes or no based on the package deal. Huffing and puffing here without a TA yet is a total waste of time. (I voted no on the last one BTW)

Yup, pretty boring, but a lot more practical and productive than writing 5,000 posts here.
-
KnotSoFast is offline  
Old 06-29-2016, 04:48 PM
  #20  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by KnotSoFast View Post
I think I will wait until a TA is actually reached and published before I go chest thumping about my absolute minimums. The TA will be hundreds of pages long. For my vote, I plan on reading the whole thing, THEN deciding yes or no based on the package deal. Huffing and puffing here without a TA yet is a total waste of time. (I voted no on the last one BTW)

Yup, pretty boring, but a lot more practical and productive than writing 5,000 posts here.
-
Originally Posted by Scoop View Post
OK but the TA was a pitiful 15% after the PS trade. The market for Pilots is increasing rapidly. I assume you are aware of what Allegiant just got.

Scoop


All of this!

Is 15,000 posts better than 5000? (the answer is yes)
80ktsClamp is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GonzoandCamila
Pilot Health
0
08-22-2015 05:43 PM
WhiteH2O
Regional
81
04-06-2007 02:36 PM
dbtownley
Technical
5
02-12-2007 09:12 AM
747Dog
Money Talk
0
03-11-2005 10:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices