![]() |
Originally Posted by Trip7
(Post 2182845)
Agree 1000%. There's something in this career for everyone. Nighttime cargo is not it for me.
|
Originally Posted by tunes
(Post 2182893)
i hope you never fly international then....because it's the same thing
|
Originally Posted by crewdawg
(Post 2182903)
Wait, Delta international flies a few legs to a hub, sits for a few hours then flies a few legs back to an out base? Hmm...better rethink my bids!
|
Originally Posted by crewdawg
(Post 2182903)
Wait, Delta international flies a few legs to a hub, sits for a few hours then flies a few legs back to an out base? Hmm...better rethink my bids!
Back to the "my airline is better than yours" arguments. UA *what I haven't done is purple international. It seems to me people love the flying but some can't stomach the long trips. Many of the trips are 12 to 15 days (I think) and that doesn't work for everyone's family. But lots of long layovers and at least on the 777 a nice crew rest facility. New hires going to the 777 every month too. |
Originally Posted by KnotSoFast
(Post 2182745)
Uhhhhh, that's many, many multiples of my max out-of-pocket with a family of four.
I am really glad I didn't have that extra kid. Looks like the third kid triggers a 3X increase in max out-of-pocket family max.:eek: |
Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
(Post 2182499)
Flying international will ALWAYS offer more days off and higher QOL, its just a fact, and the wide bodies will always offer significantly more pay and that is a fact.
Lots of EU trips are right at or maybe very slightly above the daily average already, right along with 100% of all narrow body trips. All without the incredibly punishing circadian flipping schedules that, I don't care what anyone claims, takes a heavy toll on human health. International can be more fun, and certainly has some soft perks like always being fed first class food, etc. along with the aura/lifestyle/prestige that for many brings a lot of value. And as a rule international *tends* to be more commutable and its definitely more logistical to have a second wife in Prague than Des Moines. But the glory days of "Paris, First Class, International" are highly exaggerated from a QOL standpoint. Yes of course there's exceptions, but for the most part its really not as amazing as the old and persistent stereotypes suggest it is. |
Originally Posted by Xray678
(Post 2182604)
Staying senior in your seat is key to QOL and money at Delta. I know 88 captains making far more money than 777 capts. I also know 717 FOs making far more than 717 capts.
Staying senior in your seat is the key to maximizing QOL and/or pay at Delta, doesn't matter what seat it is. |
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 2183121)
Not necessarily. With rigs and average min days, the lines are blurring more and more. In many cases you can hold domestic trips higher per day credit than many international trips. By the time you can hold the tiny percentage of deep Europe or whatever on a wide body, you could have already been holding 7-8+ hour day turns (or other higher power trips) on a narrow body, and in some cases be home every night, on 9 to 10 days of work a month. With no off circadian anything.
Lots of EU trips are right at or maybe very slightly above the daily average already, right along with 100% of all narrow body trips. All without the incredibly punishing circadian flipping schedules that, I don't care what anyone claims, takes a heavy toll on human health. International can be more fun, and certainly has some soft perks like always being fed first class food, etc. along with the aura/lifestyle/prestige that for many brings a lot of value. And as a rule international *tends* to be more commutable and its definitely more logistical to have a second wife in Prague than Des Moines. But the glory days of "Paris, First Class, International" are highly exaggerated from a QOL standpoint. Yes of course there's exceptions, but for the most part its really not as amazing as the old and persistent stereotypes suggest it is. |
Originally Posted by UnusualAttitude
(Post 2183006)
I've flown both widget international (EU and Asia) and purple domestic. If anyone wants a comparison of how it works I'll be glad to talk via PM (lest you hear from people who have never done either how bad back side of the clock flying is). The rest strategies I use wouldn't work for everyone but I've found what works for me most of the time.
Back to the "my airline is better than yours" arguments. UA *what I haven't done is purple international. It seems to me people love the flying but some can't stomach the long trips. Many of the trips are 12 to 15 days (I think) and that doesn't work for everyone's family. But lots of long layovers and at least on the 777 a nice crew rest facility. New hires going to the 777 every month too. |
Originally Posted by Hank Kingsley
(Post 2183130)
I won't dispute what your saying, but you're also cherry picking the best of domestic. There's no doubt the int'l is tough on your body. It's a choice. I commute and wouldn't do it to domestic. Just a preference.
Its not a dig against international at all. Just that the stereotypes about phenomenal productivity are greatly exaggerated. Now if your main point is that UAL/AA offer more higher paying opportunities while we flounder to outsource what even our outsourcing competitors are able to do themselves, well then you absolutely have a point. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:11 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands