Search

Notices

Swa aip

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-02-2016 | 10:36 AM
  #191  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,883
Likes: 197
Default

Originally Posted by Tanker1497
Hello

1. Our 15 percent of flight pay goes into our 401k.

2. No. You can contribute any amount up to annual limits, but no match.

Congrats on the new contract!
The companies current table position is to raise the DC funding to 16%. Sounds good however they have proposed eliminating that payment on profit sharing. With the profit sharing last year the actual rate paid by the company was just over 18%. If we keep the PS pensionable and the companies profit meets current guidance we would be looking at close to 20% on 2017 earnings. Giving up pensionability of the profit sharing would be a huge giveback.
Reply
Old 09-02-2016 | 03:44 PM
  #192  
Bus driver
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 902
Likes: 16
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
The companies current table position is to raise the DC funding to 16%. Sounds good however they have proposed eliminating that payment on profit sharing. With the profit sharing last year the actual rate paid by the company was just over 18%. If we keep the PS pensionable and the companies profit meets current guidance we would be looking at close to 20% on 2017 earnings. Giving up pensionability of the profit sharing would be a huge giveback.
I agree sailing. Their current position also includes the greedy officers eat before their troops PTIX calculation provision. That is yyuuggee as well. I honestly believe that any TA we see, regardless of content, won't pass if the company touches PS...imho
Reply
Old 09-03-2016 | 04:14 AM
  #193  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,152
Likes: 129
Default

Originally Posted by Tanker1497
Their current position also includes the greedy officers eat before their troops PTIX calculation provision.
I could be alone, but I hate this analogy. Our management team is not analogous in any way to senior military leaders. Our nation's senior leaders (mostly) earned their position through demonstrations of effective leadership, (mostly) understand and demonstrate actual leadership, (mostly) care about the welfare of their subordinates and generally make only single digit multiples more income than their troops.

EB has demonstrated no leadership skills that I am aware of. His experience as an auditor puts him more aligned with a senior civil servant auditor in DFAS...with the exception being his immense compensation package.

SD sounds like a great guy by all accounts, but his demonstrably misleading statements about management's intent to be "industry-leading" have me thinking he's no officer-equivalent either.

It's scary to think how advantaged we could be as a company if we actually signed an agreement that was industry-leading in pay, benefits and work rules. Having that option requires a management team that understands motivation, understands sacrifice, and actually values its people over short-term profits. THAT would be leadership and the officers/troops analogy might have some validity.
Reply
Old 09-03-2016 | 05:59 AM
  #194  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 4,116
Likes: 1
Default

okay....lets just say its like the babydaddy getting his christmas bling on.....and then telling the babymomma to get hers and the babys at the dollar store.
Reply
Old 09-03-2016 | 06:13 AM
  #195  
Trip7's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,217
Likes: 273
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
The companies current table position is to raise the DC funding to 16%. Sounds good however they have proposed eliminating that payment on profit sharing. With the profit sharing last year the actual rate paid by the company was just over 18%. If we keep the PS pensionable and the companies profit meets current guidance we would be looking at close to 20% on 2017 earnings. Giving up pensionability of the profit sharing would be a huge giveback.
At the C44 LEC Meeting JM stated he was confident the negotiatiors will be able to remove this toxin
Reply
Old 09-03-2016 | 11:31 AM
  #196  
notEnuf's Avatar
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,355
Likes: 841
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by Trip7
At the C44 LEC Meeting JM stated he was confident the negotiatiors will be able to remove this toxin
If they want any agreement to get out of the MEC, this is fundamental. Even the 7 would not vote for this. Well maybe Buzz, I can't put anything past that guy.

Last edited by notEnuf; 09-03-2016 at 11:48 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
samballs
Regional
368
09-26-2012 09:23 PM
MatthewAMEL
Southwest
103
11-09-2011 03:08 AM
Sr. Barco
Southwest
44
10-12-2011 07:39 PM
Metal121
Major
20
02-04-2008 08:31 PM
av8r4aa
Major
82
11-29-2006 08:11 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices