A321 pay rate
09-10-2016 | 05:50 PM
#41
Thread Starter
Racketeer
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,242
Likes: 702
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
You can't ever bind a third party not involved in a negotiation. I meant to say arbitrator. The arbitrator is not bound by our contract. The company showed up as did Dalpa and met all timelines. We await the arbitrators decision and he is not under any obligation from our contract. DALPA pointed this out in a recent communication.
09-10-2016 | 06:37 PM
#42
Straight QOL, homie
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,202
Likes: 1
From: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
The transcripts of the hearing haven't even been finalized. The arbitrator can't do much without those. We're still weeks or months from a decision.
Looks like the company and Malone/Phinney (contract admin chairman) have implicitly agreed to blow off the contractual timeline. I'm sure our guys thought they'd get something in return for solving the company's problems. Oops.
Phinney already seems to be nearby ********** whenever the company successfully stomps all over our contact. Get him out.
Looks like the company and Malone/Phinney (contract admin chairman) have implicitly agreed to blow off the contractual timeline. I'm sure our guys thought they'd get something in return for solving the company's problems. Oops.
Phinney already seems to be nearby ********** whenever the company successfully stomps all over our contact. Get him out.
Last edited by UAL T38 Phlyer; 09-11-2016 at 03:35 AM. Reason: TOU
09-10-2016 | 06:41 PM
#43
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,362
Likes: 58
09-10-2016 | 06:48 PM
#44
Straight QOL, homie
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,202
Likes: 1
From: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
It's time to finish the administration purge we started last summer.
09-11-2016 | 04:45 AM
#46
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 7,292
Likes: 0
From: A350 Both
You can't ever bind a third party not involved in a negotiation. I meant to say arbitrator. The arbitrator is not bound by our contract. The company showed up as did Dalpa and met all timelines. We await the arbitrators decision and he is not under any obligation from our contract. DALPA pointed this out in a recent communication.
09-11-2016 | 04:56 AM
#47
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,871
Likes: 189
Yes, it's horrible. Guys will have to wait a extra 60 days or so to get their retro. We could make lots of noise and push him I suppose. That would probably solve the whole retro situation! Is there reverse retro?
09-11-2016 | 05:03 AM
#48
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 7,292
Likes: 0
From: A350 Both
And delayed wages are affected by TVM. They should get interest as well imho.
09-11-2016 | 06:47 AM
#50
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,685
Likes: 0
From: "Prof" button manipulator
The TVM argument - for some of these yahoo's - only applies when supporting their weak positions on Section 6 negotiations, not when discussing any other lost income. (i.e. 321 pay)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
