Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Would You? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/97138-would-you.html)

80ktsClamp 09-12-2016 02:25 PM

used to be until he got recalled is the more appropriate phrasing...

deadseal 09-12-2016 02:30 PM


Originally Posted by D Mantooth (Post 2200965)
I don't even know where to start on this. Good Lord.

You must have not gone to the same college Tom Brielmann didn't go to.

It's not gone, it's in our pockets. And we would bargain off those rates in the next contract.

Forget it. Math and risk analysis is obviously hard.

You guys should consider converting all of our pay to profit sharing.

ok ok ok......Stop right there. Mantooth...explain to me very carefully why you think we would retain the % bump from trading PS for the next 30 years. If you do that in a clear concise way, i will change my stance on this. Other wise you just look like a money grubbing short timer....im not calling you that......just saying you look like one.

Spudhauler 09-12-2016 02:41 PM


Originally Posted by D Mantooth (Post 2200965)
I don't even know where to start on this. Good Lord.

You must have not gone to the same college Tom Brielmann didn't go to.

It's not gone, it's in our pockets. And we would bargain off those rates in the next contract.

Forget it. Math and risk analysis is obviously hard.

You guys should consider converting all of our pay to profit sharing.

Two questions. One, if trading PS for pay rates is a good deal, why is management pushing it so hard? Two, when the economy turns, and it will, the company will come after our pay rates. Then we end up with a contract with lousy QOL concessions, PS decreases for when the economy recovers, and reduced pay rates. Not sure why you're arguing the company's line, but your argument that we would bargain off new rates in subsequent contracts ignores the history of this profession.

Hawaii50 09-12-2016 02:45 PM


Originally Posted by D Mantooth (Post 2200965)
I don't even know where to start on this. Good Lord.

You must have not gone to the same college Tom Brielmann didn't go to.

It's not gone, it's in our pockets. And we would bargain off those rates in the next contract.

Forget it. Math and risk analysis is obviously hard.

You guys should consider converting all of our pay to profit sharing.

I think the point most people are trying to make is that pay rates are going to be the same across UAL, AA, DL etc. within a few percent always. If we throw profit sharing into pay rates now next contract they'll look at us and completely forget we gave up profit sharing and compare our rates to our so called peers. You don't agree? For example are we now allowed much higher pay rates than UAL because we rolled profit sharing into pay in 2012? You may say they patterned of our rates, which included 2012 profit sharing rolled in, to get their current rates. That's possible but AA hasn't had profit sharing until recently but has relatively the same pay rates as we do.

Scoop 09-12-2016 03:09 PM


Originally Posted by Hawaii50 (Post 2201021)
I think the point most people are trying to make is that pay rates are going to be the same across UAL, AA, DL etc. within a few percent always. If we throw profit sharing into pay rates now next contract they'll look at us and completely forget we gave up profit sharing and compare our rates to our so called peers. You don't agree? For example are we now allowed much higher pay rates now than UAL because we rolled profit sharing into pay in 2012?


Bingo! We are actually seeing this play out before our eyes with this TA.

Scoop

Moondog 09-12-2016 03:54 PM


Originally Posted by longcall (Post 2200926)
This ^^^^

And back to the original post.. Dude how dense are you? If we convert PS to pay rates, it is lost the next contract cycle. Just like the C2012 conversion. Gone.

They just don't get it. We won't sell our QOL for a few bucks.

JamesBond 09-12-2016 03:56 PM


Originally Posted by notEnuf (Post 2200971)
Keep throwing that flag, you are making me think about it in a different way. For FOs OE trip drops will be a significant portion of compensation or QOL (as they choose) going forward. There will be a lot of OE in the future. The fact that they have a choice now is significant. The company sees it as a productivity item so I don't see much changing with it.

So you agree then. It IS about the money.

crewdawg 09-12-2016 03:57 PM


Originally Posted by Hawaii50 (Post 2201021)
If we throw profit sharing into pay rates now next contract they'll look at us and completely forget we gave up profit sharing and compare our rates to our so called peers.


Originally Posted by Scoop (Post 2201034)
Bingo! We are actually seeing this play out before our eyes with this TA.

Scoop

^^^^^^this!

Wuzatforus 09-12-2016 04:03 PM


Originally Posted by D Mantooth (Post 2200784)
If management came to you tomorrow and asked if you wanted to take $10 an hour of a pay rate and convert it into an equivalent profit-sharing percentage, what would you say? Unless you were insane, you'd tell them to pound sand. The pay rate is far more secure and is delivered every two weeks.

So why is there such outcry when I support doing the opposite?

And, to be very clear, I do not support "trading" it for higher pay. Get the best rates we possibly can, and then (only then) try to convert some defined PS percentage into a higher pay rate on top of what was negotiated, leaving the upper end of PS intact so we can share in the bounty if Delta continues to prosper.

To be clear, I know that this is a moot point. PS is somehow a sacred cow now, even though DALPA was ridiculed when they negotiated it.

You can't have it your way. They won't allow us to have substantially higher rates. So, we're stuck with UAL or AA or SWA "plus" as a cap, with or without throwing away PS. I'd prefer without throwing away PS.

cornbeef007 09-12-2016 04:10 PM


Originally Posted by D Mantooth (Post 2200965)
I don't even know where to start on this. Good Lord.

You must have not gone to the same college Tom Brielmann didn't go to.

It's not gone, it's in our pockets. And we would bargain off those rates in the next contract.

Forget it. Math and risk analysis is obviously hard.

You guys should consider converting all of our pay to profit sharing.

What is your retirement year?

JamesBond 09-12-2016 04:12 PM


Originally Posted by cornbeef007 (Post 2201073)
What is your retirement year?

How is that relevant to anything? Does it make you feel better throwing him under the bus knowing he only has a few years left?

cornbeef007 09-12-2016 04:16 PM


Originally Posted by JamesBond (Post 2201074)
How is that relevant to anything? Does it make you feel better throwing him under the bus knowing he only has a few years left?

No....I'm just curious. Our calculators aren't in sync and I would like to figure out why. That's the only variable I can think of.

JamesBond 09-12-2016 04:18 PM


Originally Posted by cornbeef007 (Post 2201075)
No....I'm just curious. Our calculators aren't in sync and I would like to figure out why. That's the only variable I can think of.

Sorry for the snark. I get the feeling that some of the "QOLers" on here have zero problem throwing the deadzoners under the bus so they don't have to get a doctor's note.

No.

Problem.

Tanker1497 09-12-2016 04:21 PM

Yeah, that's why we are stuck in the mud James...a doctor's note.

deadseal 09-12-2016 04:28 PM


Originally Posted by JamesBond (Post 2201080)
Sorry for the snark. I get the feeling that some of the "QOLers" on here have zero problem throwing the deadzoners under the bus so they don't have to get a doctor's note.

No.

Problem.

Just like they (you?) would throw the young guys under the bus for an extra 16%ish. I get it, I understand it. But hopefully there are more of us than you. Please stop griping about this when your crowd is doing the same thing. Let's all be honest with each other eh?

It's more than just a doctors note but you know that. It's about setting the right precedent when the company is making ****ing billions. Come on dude

JamesBond 09-12-2016 04:30 PM


Originally Posted by Tanker1497 (Post 2201083)
Yeah, that's why we are stuck in the mud James...a doctor's note.

One of the reasons. If I felt like proving the point that you know is true, I'd go back and quote all the "I'm voting no because of the sick leave" posts.

That's not the point of the post though Tank. The point is that those with the most time to recover are going to throw the deadzoners right under the bus and feel great about doing so yet get all incensed if one of said deadzoners refers to a good deal money wise.

Unity.

Selfishness is not a big part of that concept.

JamesBond 09-12-2016 04:32 PM


Originally Posted by JamesBond (Post 2201090)
One of the reasons. If I felt like proving the point that you know is true, I'd go back and quote all the "I'm voting no because of the sick leave" posts.

That's not the point of the post though Tank. The point is that those with the most time to recover are going to throw the deadzoners right under the bus and feel great about doing so yet get all incensed if one of said deadzoners refers to a good deal money wise.

Unity.

Selfishness is not a big part of that concept.

Right on cue, MR Selfish in the flesh.


Originally Posted by deadseal (Post 2201088)
Just like they (you?) would throw the young guys under the bus for an extra 16%ish. I get it, I understand it. But hopefully there are more of us than you. Please stop griping about this when your crowd is doing the same thing. Let's all be honest with each other eh?

It's more than just a doctors note but you know that. It's about setting the right precedent when the company is making ****ing billions. Come on dude

No stud. I have my pushbutton issues as well. And my pushbutton issues are ones that will keep YOU from being screwed. But you don't GAS about that do you? You aren't even remotely interested in compromise. It's your way or the highway. I am not that selfish.

notEnuf 09-12-2016 04:33 PM


Originally Posted by D Mantooth (Post 2200793)
Sure, Ted. Valid question.

In any negotiation (like today's), Delta is not going to agree to pay us drastically above the market in total compensation (rates, work rules, PS, retirement, etc.). Further, the NMB is going to factor all of those things when they determine the "zone of reasonableness."

It's almost as if we negotiate a big pie with the company, and we get to decide how to slice it up. The size of the pie will stay the same regardless of how we label the slices.

The idea that PS payments are somehow hidden is just not realistic. The current negotiations prove that.

I think the pie got bigger over last year. Right?

JamesBond 09-12-2016 04:34 PM


Originally Posted by notEnuf (Post 2201098)
I think the pie got bigger over last year. Right?

Has it? Did we get a pay increase that I have not heard about?

It' s like the stock market. You haven't made money until you sell. We haven't sold.

notEnuf 09-12-2016 04:37 PM


Originally Posted by D Mantooth (Post 2200826)
I'll buy that. Any way we can convert "maybe" compensation to "definitely" compensation (in whatever form) is fine with me.

Yes, bring ALL Delta brand flying to Delta pilots. End all outsourcing completely.

notEnuf 09-12-2016 04:38 PM


Originally Posted by JamesBond (Post 2201100)
Has it? Did we get a pay increase that I have not heard about?

It' s like the stock market. You haven't made money until you sell. We haven't sold.

No but the buyer seems more motivated.

cornbeef007 09-12-2016 04:42 PM


Originally Posted by JamesBond (Post 2201080)
Sorry for the snark. I get the feeling that some of the "QOLers" on here have zero problem throwing the deadzoners under the bus so they don't have to get a doctor's note.

No.

Problem.

It's no big deal, most of us are somewhat frustrated. I fully understand the deadzone guys got the shaft on more then one occasion. I think the south guys saw the worst of it. Whether it was B scale, RJs, furlough or long term stagnation, they were shafted. The problem is the process involved in these issues began with management but were eventually implemented because of pilots senior to them. It's a circle, the senior sellout the junior guys and this process continues perpetually. A ****** circle, if you will.

This mindset is changing within a large number of senior pilots. They have been crapped on by senior guys for a good part of their careers but many are fed up with this concept and are simply not going to accept it this time around. There is no better time to break the circle then the present and many are displaying an extreme level of integrity.

I applaud their sacrifice and in return I will not sell out the junior folks for the duration of my career.

How many years do you have left D Mantooth? Just curious because my calculator and math don't seem to work the same as yours.

Banzai 09-12-2016 04:51 PM


Originally Posted by Viking busdvr (Post 2201007)
You think it's not??

That's actually what I'm starting to wonder...

notEnuf 09-12-2016 04:51 PM


Originally Posted by Hawaii50 (Post 2201021)
I think the point most people are trying to make is that pay rates are going to be the same across UAL, AA, DL etc. within a few percent always. If we throw profit sharing into pay rates now next contract they'll look at us and completely forget we gave up profit sharing and compare our rates to our so called peers. You don't agree? For example are we now allowed much higher pay rates than UAL because we rolled profit sharing into pay in 2012? You may say they patterned of our rates, which included 2012 profit sharing rolled in, to get their current rates. That's possible but AA hasn't had profit sharing until recently but has relatively the same pay rates as we do.

Ding, ding, ding. We have a winner! Step right up sir and claim your prize.

Has your compensation improved more over the last 3 years by 3% cola bumps or % gains in profit sharing? How about this year?

Banzai 09-12-2016 04:52 PM


Originally Posted by Express pilot (Post 2200984)
Got this off Chit Chat. This is funny
"I sure hope they show up for picketing in a visible gesture of support for the adopted MEC strategy.

Surely with all the emails and phone calls of support -- the MC/MEC/LECs claim exist -- they ought to be able to contact them quickly and easily fill the picketing lines to capacity.

Maybe they'll even carry signs:

"I ❤️ VEBA"
"No base like a virtual base"
"Sick Leave is for criminals"
"More power to the schedulers"
"MGT has needs too!"

Good luck from the inconsequential vocal/active minority!"
RH

Hee hee hee!!! Best signs ever! Where can I get mine?

deadseal 09-12-2016 05:08 PM


Originally Posted by JamesBond (Post 2201096)
Right on cue, MR Selfish in the flesh.



No stud. I have my pushbutton issues as well. And my pushbutton issues are ones that will keep YOU from being screwed. But you don't GAS about that do you? You aren't even remotely interested in compromise. It's your way or the highway. I am not that selfish.

Of course I'm selfish, I've already admitted that in past comments. But so are you so stop calling everyone else selfish. It's hypocritical. Just like when you blithely told someone they should have planned better for their retirement, and are now *****ing about getting more money for your retirement. What exactly do you find confusing about that?

Karnak 09-12-2016 05:33 PM


Originally Posted by Moondog (Post 2201059)
They just don't get it. We won't sell our QOL for a few bucks.

Not picking on you. Your post just happened to be the most recent with this theme.

What if the survey indicated we want money over all else? What if the "QOL" items aren't as important to us as the compensation items?

crewdawg 09-12-2016 05:49 PM


Originally Posted by Karnak (Post 2201139)
Not picking on you. Your post just happened to be the most recent with this theme.

What if the survey indicated we want money over all else? What if the "QOL" items aren't as important to us as the compensation items?

It will always be a "what if," because the mere peasants don't get to see the polling info.

notEnuf 09-12-2016 05:54 PM

What if you worked for an employer that honored their deals and appreciated their employees for rescuing the business?

longcall 09-12-2016 06:06 PM


Originally Posted by Hawaii50 (Post 2201021)
I think the point most people are trying to make is that pay rates are going to be the same across UAL, AA, DL etc. within a few percent always. If we throw profit sharing into pay rates now next contract they'll look at us and completely forget we gave up profit sharing and compare our rates to our so called peers. You don't agree? For example are we now allowed much higher pay rates than UAL because we rolled profit sharing into pay in 2012? You may say they patterned of our rates, which included 2012 profit sharing rolled in, to get their current rates. That's possible but AA hasn't had profit sharing until recently but has relatively the same pay rates as we do.

Yes. I think everyone here gets it but that Mantooth dude.

Scoop 09-12-2016 06:20 PM


Originally Posted by deadseal (Post 2201127)
Of course I'm selfish, I've already admitted that in past comments. But so are you so stop calling everyone else selfish. It's hypocritical. Just like when you blithely told someone they should have planned better for their retirement, and are now *****ing about getting more money for your retirement. What exactly do you find confusing about that?


I agree. Calling other Pilots selfish because they have different priorities is a losing argument all around. Stick to the facts and lets not make assumptions (usually wrong) about other Pilots motivations.

Scoop :)

Herkflyr 09-12-2016 06:25 PM


Originally Posted by Moondog (Post 2201059)
They just don't get it. We won't sell our QOL for a few bucks.

What does "QOL" have to do with a PS for pay trade? Not a damn thing.

D Mantooth 09-12-2016 07:21 PM

So, you guys would all trade pay rates for profit sharing. Good to know.

Validates my thoughts about many of the posters on this board.

cornbeef007 09-12-2016 07:24 PM


Originally Posted by D Mantooth (Post 2201196)
So, you guys would all trade pay rates for profit sharing. Good to know.

Validates my thoughts about many of the posters on this board.

Whats your retirement year?

notEnuf 09-12-2016 07:24 PM


Originally Posted by D Mantooth (Post 2201196)
So, you guys would all trade pay rates for profit sharing. Good to know.

Validates my thoughts about many of the posters on this board.

I think retaining that investment as 1/3 of total compensation is about right to diversify my compensation. Thereby capturing the outsourced profit generation as well as global commercial initiatives. Not to mention the myriad of profit generating techniques not yet known that management will use to grow the enterprise.

forgot to bid 09-13-2016 04:28 AM


Originally Posted by D Mantooth (Post 2200784)
If management came to you tomorrow and asked if you wanted to take $10 an hour of a pay rate and convert it into an equivalent profit-sharing percentage, what would you say? Unless you were insane, you'd tell them to pound sand. The pay rate is far more secure and is delivered every two weeks.

So why is there such outcry when I support doing the opposite?

And, to be very clear, I do not support "trading" it for higher pay. Get the best rates we possibly can, and then (only then) try to convert some defined PS percentage into a higher pay rate on top of what was negotiated, leaving the upper end of PS intact so we can share in the bounty if Delta continues to prosper.

To be clear, I know that this is a moot point. PS is somehow a sacred cow now, even though DALPA was ridiculed when they negotiated it.

Why not graph this out?

Take Joe Average ATL7ERB at 60% on the seniority list and multiply PWA 2012 pay for 2016-2020. Then run projected PS numbers, do high %, current % and 0% PS.

Then change the numbers for what TA2015 would have been and say what TA2016 might be.

Put real numbers to it, pay rates are not everything, W2 is.

It's just an idea. Now I'm going back to make fun of Huffpost posters....

JamesBond 09-13-2016 04:51 AM


Originally Posted by Scoop (Post 2201165)
I agree. Calling other Pilots selfish because they have different priorities is a losing argument all around. Stick to the facts and lets not make assumptions (usually wrong) about other Pilots motivations.

Scoop :)

So I suppose you see that the shoe fits both feet and will acknowledge that as well? Or does it not apply since his opinion is in lockstep with yours?

gzsg 09-13-2016 05:11 AM


Originally Posted by D Mantooth (Post 2200965)
I don't even know where to start on this. Good Lord.

You must have not gone to the same college Tom Brielmann didn't go to.

It's not gone, it's in our pockets. And we would bargain off those rates in the next contract.

Forget it. Math and risk analysis is obviously hard.

You guys should consider converting all of our pay to profit sharing.

What college did Steve Jobs graduate from?

Mantooth tell us why you couldn't get in the Air Force?

deadseal 09-13-2016 06:02 AM


Originally Posted by JamesBond (Post 2201356)
So I suppose you see that the shoe fits both feet and will acknowledge that as well? Or does it not apply since his opinion is in lockstep with yours?

I took his comment as a reproach of us both. But if you want to make it all about you........what do they call that again?

JamesBond 09-13-2016 06:48 AM


Originally Posted by deadseal (Post 2201400)
I took his comment as a reproach of us both. But if you want to make it all about you........what do they call that again?

I catch a lot more **** on her than you do because my opinion is not the popular one. So I just assume it is wrong.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:43 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands