Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Race to the bottom of the market >

Race to the bottom of the market

Search

Notices

Race to the bottom of the market

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-13-2016 | 08:53 AM
  #11  
Bus driver
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 894
Likes: 9
Default

Originally Posted by rube
We’re not “parked,” we’re not even “formally recessed,” we just have a lot of open dates on our calendar because the NMB has decided to reallocate their limited resources to cases that actually have a scant hope of reaching an agreement. The NMB controls the clock; the clock is stopped, but we aren’t parked? Really?

Our union has decided to negotiate in public, posting a thumbnail sketch of ALPA and Delta’s table positions on a very narrow spectrum. On the face of it, the two sides look close to a deal, and that is puzzling, because negotiating in public only really works as a ploy when the sides are far apart, and the whole point of the tactic is to paint the other side as unreasonable. A couple points’ difference isn’t going to convince an objective third party (like a mediator, an investor, a Congressman, or a federal judge) of anything.

Negotiating in public makes it difficult – if not impossible - for either side to move without appearing weak or conciliatory. The last Negotiator’s Notepad says we can still meet with the company in the meantime, but what would induce management to view that favorably, since we have let them off the hook with our own false assumptions and flawed direction?

Both sides need a reason to sign a tentative agreement, or one side will find a better alternative in mediation. Again, see the clock? It’s stopped.

On our side of the fence, I see a lot of self-serving fantasies that are enabled in large part by a certain dozen representatives of the Delta MEC. These are the guys who decided that it would be a great idea to ignore the polling data, ignore subject matter experts, and the professional negotiators that we keep on retainer. These are the guys who got us parked last Friday. They have no plan that will ensure the resumption of negotiations, mediated or otherwise.

Our union leadership thinks that we can get the ball across the plane with more street theater, sideshows, and form letters to the chief pilots? None of those things have the slightest impact on leverage or the market for our services.

We have NO PLAN. All we have are some Rush Week fraternity gimmicks to **** off Dean Wormer, a communications plan that tries to moralize when it should be giving a business case, and a representative body that has suspended the normally accepted rules of civil discourse in favor of populist flapdoodle.

Management knows that they have to hew close to the line with the NMB, so this is just a math problem after costing. I think that they refuse to budge from their current position because they have no trust in Malone’s ability to get any deal past the cabal on the MEC. If the company doesn’t have a shred of confidence in the people we send to the table, then they have no reason to deal honestly, let alone approach the limits of their direction.

“I’ll have to ask my boss” always means, “you really should be talking to my boss, because I don’t have the chops to close.”
You greatly underestimate how the AIP's, vacation pay (no credit towards LCW), only two points DC increase (down from 3 in initial counter proposal) coupled with VEBA as the addressing of retirement, etc, have the captains I fly with feeling. Just a small sampling of our large airline, but they are more frustrated now, easily, than they were with the epic failure last summer. You seem to think that a lot of us want a deal quicky, even if it's inadequate. Not what I'm seeing. We'll see when we finally get a TA to vote on, but that's not happening anytime soon.
Reply
Old 09-13-2016 | 08:57 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Default

So far what he predicted last year regarding NMB behavior was right on. And Brielmann, who called upon every bit of his high school education, was dead wrong when he called the NMB a "bogeyman" and predicted the company would come crawling back.
Reply
Old 09-13-2016 | 09:02 AM
  #13  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

He's nearly 100% wrong except for the date of application to the NMB. Keep trying, though. Absolutely pathetic....
Reply
Old 09-13-2016 | 09:46 AM
  #14  
GogglesPisano's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
20M Airline Miles
10 Years
Gets Weekends Off
50 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 6,551
Likes: 295
From: Sitting SC at the Five Towns
Default

Mantooth: Why did last year's TA fail?
Reply
Old 09-13-2016 | 09:53 AM
  #15  
Viking busdvr's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 852
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by GogglesPisano
Mantooth: Why did last year's TA fail?
Because 65% of our pilots are dense Rocket Sturgeons!
Reply
Old 09-13-2016 | 10:02 AM
  #16  
Falsequivalence's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Default

Can't the group of you who are trying to salvage your credibility and self worth through a constant barrage of half truths and conspiracy theories while undermining the pilot group as whole during negotiations find a self help group or something formulated around a circle to occupy your time, instead of being the loggerhead for management's anti-union campaign?
Reply
Old 09-13-2016 | 12:27 PM
  #17  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rube





I think that they refuse to budge from their current position because they have no trust in Malone’s ability to get any deal past the cabal on the MEC. If the company doesn’t have a shred of confidence in the people we send to the table, then they have no reason to deal honestly, let alone approach the limits of their direction.

“I’ll have to ask my boss” always means, “you really should be talking to my boss, because I don’t have the chops to close.”

Actually the exact opposite happened in BWI last week according to the LAX reps. We had everyone on board ready to make a deal and the company didn't send any of the decision makers. They had no intention of closing a deal.
Reply
Old 09-13-2016 | 12:46 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Viking busdvr
You can blame a "certain dozen MEC reps" if you like, but the truth of the matter is the blame for the quandary we're in lies DIRECTLY at the feet of last year's MEC which approved a HORRIBLE TA, and set the bar so low it is difficult to recover from, and of course management also shares the blame for not taking negotiations seriously. If you want to b!tch about how we got here, those two groups should be where you focus your frustrations... Just sayin😉
I think a 65% vote > mandate > industry resets the bar > no excuse for our union to fail to get in on this "once-in-a-liftetime opportunity", as they describe it.

I know we live in an era where personal accountability is not in vogue, but what excuses are they goung for NOW? Rogue NC? Moakies? Rogue John?

I DO agree with you that the company is also to blame for last year, and they DO need to step up this year.

I think most pilots in the middle part of the curve can see a deal between the last table positions, and we need to apply pressure on both parties to step up their efforts.

First one to reach the middle, wins the middle.
Reply
Old 09-13-2016 | 01:29 PM
  #19  
notEnuf's Avatar
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,248
Likes: 707
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
I think a 65% vote > mandate > industry resets the bar > no excuse for our union to fail to get in on this "once-in-a-liftetime opportunity", as they describe it.

I know we live in an era where personal accountability is not in vogue, but what excuses are they goung for NOW? Rogue NC? Moakies? Rogue John?

I DO agree with you that the company is also to blame for last year, and they DO need to step up this year.

I think most pilots in the middle part of the curve can see a deal between the last table positions, and we need to apply pressure on both parties to step up their efforts.

First one to reach the middle, wins the middle.
So the deal is at 18% you say, is that with or without concessions?
Reply
Old 09-13-2016 | 02:22 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Default

Is this why Richard Anderson retired? He knew the road that this was going down and wanted out?

I have to say for all of you that complain about the TA15 rejection.

You guys elected them, they represented you, and the deal that they said was a great one was overwhelmingly rejected.

At some point you have to look in the mirror and ask yourself if you aren't the one out of touch and stop whining to those that one.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bull
Major
139
11-01-2013 04:28 PM
FixTheMess
Regional
30
10-03-2013 12:39 PM
Bucking Bar
Major
1
06-17-2011 10:02 AM
Sir James
Money Talk
17
06-11-2006 08:38 PM
SWAjet
Major
0
06-06-2005 09:42 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices