Search

Notices

3%

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-22-2016 | 11:50 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 92
Default

Originally Posted by Check Essential
ALPA made a huge mistake when they shut down the DALPA forum.
They lost control of the information flow and now they will never get it back.

You could say the father of this whole revolution in our union is Buzz Hazzard.
If that's not irony I don't know what is.
ALPA has made plenty of mistakes. But SM was coming no matter what ALPA did. I'm not sure anyone can control information anymore...
Reply
Old 09-22-2016 | 12:51 PM
  #12  
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,252
Likes: 95
From: DAL 330
Default

Originally Posted by Check Essential
ALPA made a huge mistake when they shut down the DALPA forum.
They lost control of the information flow and now they will never get it back.

You could say the father of this whole revolution in our union is Buzz Hazzard.
If that's not irony I don't know what is.

I'm going with Al Gore - after-all if he didn't invent the Internet we wouldn't have APC, Chit Chat and Facebook.

Scoop
Reply
Old 09-22-2016 | 01:11 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
LOLWUT?

62% yes to 65% no is a LOT more than 3%, not sure what you're alluding to.

The Surrender Seven are clearly advocating for a vote of POSTA2.0 which is a repackaging of POSTA1.0 with a few "deck chairs rearranged". The big variable to them is they think the membership is so desperate for any TA they will cave and MEMRAT whatever's brought to them.

I'm fine with having a vote again on a poison pill laced agreement. One last time, and then we get serious. Will the 7 agree to that though, or will they demand another vote on a substandard TA until voter fatigue/apathy nets them something, anything?
Managements goal is 51%. Anything in excess of that is a financial waste to them. Letting them float small incremental changes by as an experiment to better understand the demographics and tweak the offer towards 51% will net a much lower result than sitting out for a 65% in favor vote.

They already bought these big RJ's, the stock had been hammered, holidays approach and they know they will have a hot and I'll tempered pilot group by Summer '17... That won't go well and they know it.

If they roll into Summer 17 still playing games hedge funds are going to want their flesh and a few heads.

50-seaters go unstaffed... Paid for big RJ's hanging out in AZ... New hires going to other options.... Sick leave?

Strategy... Wind the clock and wait. It IS what they fear most. THEY approached us to open early, not out of kindness.
Reply
Old 09-22-2016 | 01:48 PM
  #14  
JamesBond's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 7,292
Likes: 0
From: A350 Both
Default

Originally Posted by LandGreen2
IMO Social Media is a huge factor. Why do you think so many of the black polo shirts are on here posting everyday, every thread, and trying so hard to control the message. C2012 vote might have been a lot closer if the members were fluent in social media. As the demographics of the seniority list change, the younger crowd will certainly do most of their information exchanges thru social media and very little thru MEC propaganda.
Doesn't make sense. The black shirts were deposed. The 12 owns everything from here on. Why would they want to 'control' a message they have nothing to do with?

Propaganda is an interesting choice of word.

Regarding the interwebs: I bet you trust Wikipedia to be 100% accurate as well? I agree that social media is a big big factor, but there are a TON of half truths and influence being brought to bear that is just plain bad.
Reply
Old 09-22-2016 | 01:51 PM
  #15  
JamesBond's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 7,292
Likes: 0
From: A350 Both
Default

Originally Posted by 300SMK
Wind the clock and wait. It IS what they fear most. THEY approached us to open early, not out of kindness.
First of all, we are past the amendable date. Nothing at this point is 'early'. Second, we need to revisit that overused phrase 'chess vs checkers'. You think they "fear" us winding the clock? They are already on version 237 of plan R.
Reply
Old 09-22-2016 | 02:32 PM
  #16  
notEnuf's Avatar
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,239
Likes: 687
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by JamesBond
First of all, we are past the amendable date. Nothing at this point is 'early'. Second, we need to revisit that overused phrase 'chess vs checkers'. You think they "fear" us winding the clock? They are already on version 237 of plan R.
You need to get a kinetic watch, so all your hand wringing would be useful.
Reply
Old 09-22-2016 | 03:26 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,465
Likes: 0
From: A330 First Officer
Default

Originally Posted by JamesBond
First of all, we are past the amendable date. Nothing at this point is 'early'. Second, we need to revisit that overused phrase 'chess vs checkers'. You think they "fear" us winding the clock? They are already on version 237 of plan R.
James,

You are correct that nothing at this point is early, however his point was that the company approached us early to get a deal done. We are now approaching 10 months past our amendable date and we haven't had real section 6 negotiations since C2K and people are losing their minds. We went 18 months past during C2K right.
Reply
Old 09-22-2016 | 03:30 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 92
Default

Originally Posted by DALMD88FO
James,

You are correct that nothing at this point is early, however his point was that the company approached us early to get a deal done. We are now approaching 10 months past our amendable date and we haven't had real section 6 negotiations since C2K and people are losing their minds. We went 18 months past during C2K right.
We are approaching 9 months past the amendable date.
Reply
Old 09-22-2016 | 03:34 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop
I'm going with Al Gore - after-all if he didn't invent the Internet we wouldn't have APC, Chit Chat and Facebook.

Scoop
And, he actually won the vote.
Reply
Old 09-22-2016 | 06:06 PM
  #20  
Elliot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,685
Likes: 0
From: "Prof" button manipulator
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop
I'm going with Al Gore - after-all if he didn't invent the Internet we wouldn't have APC, Chit Chat and Facebook.

Scoop
POLITICAL POST!!

Against forum TOU!!

Where's a Mod when you need them?!?!
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices