Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Delta to purchase $2.3 BILLION worth of RJ's >

Delta to purchase $2.3 BILLION worth of RJ's

Search
Notices

Delta to purchase $2.3 BILLION worth of RJ's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-27-2016, 02:42 PM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Posts: 325
Default

Originally Posted by Erdude32 View Post
Changing the narrative. From the NN 16-13:

Regional Jets
Eliminate all 50-seat RJs and increase domestic mainline block hour protection in conjunction with C-series jet deliveries and the option to add up to 50 two-class RJs (either 70- or 76-seat aircraft)


So what's being proposed ISN'T parking 50 200's for 50 170's. It's parking ALL 200's for 50 170's.

This is a net loss of seats, block hours and jobs at DCI.

This is a GOOD thing.
He/She wasn't saying its a 50 for 50 trade. They were saying that DCI going forward can only staff maybe 75 of the current 125 50 seaters so in reality it's 50/50 trade.
Skittles9E is offline  
Old 09-27-2016, 02:46 PM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Trip7's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,414
Default

Originally Posted by bluejuice71 View Post
Agreed. I'm all for scope, but if Delta wants up to fifty more 76 seaters and they will get rid all the 50 seaters and have an overall reduction in seats flown at the connection carriers then I'm all for it. Especially since they will be tied to mainline block hour ratios. Seems like a win win. We get bigger pay raises and they get a few more RJ's. In an ideal world they would all be flown at mainline, but that's not happening yet. I would certainly rather have a TA that will pay me $3500 - $4000 more per month and let them have a few more RJ's then get nothing! If any of you guys were to say you'd give up that kind of money for a few more RJ's that will have no effect on your career you're not be honest with yourself.
I couldn't agree more. Well said.
Trip7 is offline  
Old 09-27-2016, 02:58 PM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,195
Default

Originally Posted by Erdude32 View Post
Changing the narrative. From the NN 16-13:

Regional Jets
Eliminate all 50-seat RJs and increase domestic mainline block hour protection in conjunction with C-series jet deliveries and the option to add up to 50 two-class RJs (either 70- or 76-seat aircraft)


So what's being proposed ISN'T parking 50 200's for 50 170's. It's parking ALL 200's for 50 170's.

This is a net loss of seats, block hours and jobs at DCI.

This is a GOOD thing.
The 50's are going away on their own. You're giving the 76 seaters for something that will happen anyway.

Ask United guys how giving away RJ flying for pay worked out.
Grumble is offline  
Old 09-27-2016, 03:10 PM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 488
Default

Originally Posted by Erdude32 View Post
So what's being proposed ISN'T parking 50 200's for 50 170's. It's parking ALL 200's for 50 170's.

This is a net loss of seats, block hours and jobs at DCI.

This is a GOOD thing.

And when we give away more 76 seat rj's on the next agreement or LOA, or the next one after that, will it still be a good thing?

Now all those parked 50 seat rj's are fully replaced by 76 seat rj's. Voila. The re-fleeting of DCI has been accomplished.

History shows we will continue to give up rj scope. A little here, a little there...It's all good they'll tell us.

It is time to end it now. Why on earth would we want to repeat the 50 seat rj scope give-away fiasco with 76 seaters this time???
APCLurker is offline  
Old 09-27-2016, 03:11 PM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
bluejuice71's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: MD88
Posts: 447
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble View Post
The 50's are going away on their own. You're giving the 76 seaters for something that will happen anyway.

Ask United guys how giving away RJ flying for pay worked out.
You guys keep saying this. BIG assumption. It's no secret Delta wants to get rid of them, but if nothing changes in our scope clause I don't believe they will. Then we are stuck with an inferior product and not getting increased pay in return. Bad deal for us.
bluejuice71 is offline  
Old 09-27-2016, 03:16 PM
  #56  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Posts: 60
Default

Originally Posted by Erdude32 View Post
Changing the narrative. From the NN 16-13:

Regional Jets
Eliminate all 50-seat RJs and increase domestic mainline block hour protection in conjunction with C-series jet deliveries and the option to add up to 50 two-class RJs (either 70- or 76-seat aircraft)


So what's being proposed ISN'T parking 50 200's for 50 170's. It's parking ALL 200's for 50 170's.

This is a net loss of seats, block hours and jobs at DCI.

This is a GOOD thing.

50 seat regional jets are already on life support. Soon to be extinct. They are timing out. It is cost prohibitive to do the required inspections on the airframe to get an additional 10k cycles on them. I've said this and posted links in other threads. There is absolutely no reason to give on scope.
Chris Hansen is offline  
Old 09-27-2016, 03:18 PM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Posts: 325
Default

Originally Posted by bluejuice71 View Post
You guys keep saying this. BIG assumption. It's no secret Delta wants to get rid of them, but if nothing changes in our scope clause I don't believe they will. Then we are stuck with an inferior product and not getting increased pay in return. Bad deal for us.
Shuttle America shed ALL of their 50 seaters this year. We (Endeavor) picked up some of them at less than a 1:1 ratio. Skywest is a strong operator and will probably be able to staff their ~40 for a little while. I know expressjet is hurting for pilots and they have another ~40. I won't pretend to know all the details of Delta's contract negotiations and you can take my opinion with more salt than a margarita rim, but all the regional carriers are hurting for pilots, and more jumbo RJ breathes life into them.
Skittles9E is offline  
Old 09-27-2016, 03:20 PM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Default

Originally Posted by 404yxl View Post
If Republic can't operate to the standards of their contract, Delta and the other mainline partners have no obligation to pay them.

If Republic does not get paid, it can't pay for the planes. Delta can take them over that way.

It's pretty straightforward actually and goes for every regional contractor out there.
Exactly.

Performance is in the contract.
gzsg is offline  
Old 09-27-2016, 03:33 PM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 319
Default

If these 76 seat regional jets are so cost effective, they'll do perfectly fine on mainliine's certificate. There are plenty of regional pilots that would be happy to be hired by Delta to fly these 76 seat jets at a respectable wage. We're finally in a market where we hold the negotiating leverage. The longer the company wants to play games the better it is for the pilot group in the long run to not give in.
Blueskies67 is offline  
Old 09-27-2016, 04:11 PM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: I got into this business so I wouldn't have to work.
Posts: 1,034
Default

Originally Posted by Twisted mind View Post
Mr. Bond,

Do you have anything to add to this conversation? Or just cheap insults and cute one liners?
Mostly the second on that question. Now if you really want to get under his skin, talk smack about Tennessee foosball.
Vincent Chase is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
StraightShooter
Endeavor Air
124
06-26-2023 10:23 AM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
FastDEW
Major
201
09-03-2011 06:42 AM
norskman2
Regional
18
07-18-2011 02:26 AM
Sir James
Major
0
04-13-2005 10:13 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices