Airline Pilot Central Forums
Page 6 of 14
« First
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   TAJV (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/97694-tajv.html)

Schwanker 10-13-2016 05:49 AM
Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 2222782)
The new agreement is 2% lower.
2% lower is roughly 4% of our share of flying.

As to Sink's claim more 76 seat RJ's (with ratios) is good, we'll continue to disagree. The latest claim you made a couple of times is those of us opposed to more RJs at DCI think we'll see 76 seaters at mainline? Who ever said they expect that?

sailingfun 10-13-2016 06:09 AM
Originally Posted by Schwanker (Post 2222796)
2% lower is roughly 4% of our share of flying.

As to Sink's claim more 76 seat RJ's (with ratios) is good, we'll continue to disagree. The latest claim you made a couple of times is those of us opposed to more RJs at DCI think we'll see 76 seaters at mainline? Who ever said they expect that?
Where did I make that claim?

JamesBond 10-13-2016 06:12 AM
I was not allowed to even vote for the last TA.
Why weren't you?

Schwanker 10-13-2016 06:17 AM
Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 2222813)
Where did I make that claim?
You didn't. I mentioned Sink.

Schwanker 10-13-2016 06:20 AM
Originally Posted by Sink r8 (Post 2222526)

I actually view the RJ status quo as a loss for us. We didn't shrink DCI and we're operating above NB ratios that we're not codifying into the contract. Meanwhile the zombie 50-seaters linger on, at company discretion. And I haven't seen the 76-seat order for mainline yet.
Sink, who claimed we'll see 76 seaters at mainline?

Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 2222813)
Where did I make that claim?
Sorry Sailing. I was trying to double quote.

JamesBond 10-13-2016 06:38 AM
Originally Posted by BtoA (Post 2222489)
Another post that contributed nothing to the conversation?

I am saying the things I say because I believe them and want other people to consider another viewpoint.

Why exactly do you post?
To expose just how ridiculous some of the SSDs sound. You think your insults and holier than thou attitude about things changes peoples' minds? Seriously?

Sink r8 10-13-2016 06:47 AM
Originally Posted by Schwanker (Post 2222830)
Sink, who claimed we'll see 76 seaters at mainline?
Various posters that argued on previous threads that the 76-seater is a very capable aircraft that the company must have, as they kill off the worthless 50-seaters. Wasn't that the point of this exercise: get the 76-seaters flown at mainline?

Otters 10-13-2016 06:52 AM
Originally Posted by JamesBond (Post 2222818)
Why weren't you?

Probably probation? As one example....

Schwanker 10-13-2016 06:54 AM
Originally Posted by Sink r8 (Post 2222852)
Various posters that argued on previous threads that the 76-seater is a very capable aircraft that the company must have, as they kill off the worthless 50-seaters. Wasn't that the point of this exercise: get the 76-seaters flown at mainline?
Who claimed we'd see 76 seat aircraft at mainline? Can you provide a quote?

Sink r8 10-13-2016 06:59 AM
Originally Posted by Schwanker (Post 2222862)
Who claimed we'd see 76 seat aircraft at mainline? Can you provide a quote?
Basically, you did.

Originally Posted by Schwanker (Post 2213212)
Giving DCI an additional 50 economically viable 76 seat aircraft INCREASES DCI flying. So if the goal is to reduce DCI flying, further scope relief is the wrong thing.
Originally Posted by Sink r8 (Post 2212572)
OK. The "tomorrow" part was a hypothetical, and not salient to the point.

We get 76-seaters gradually. Who bids them?

I think your assetion was that we have plenty of pilots who would love to fly them. I disagree.
Originally Posted by Schwanker (Post 2212579)
Do you actually think this is an issue? Any aircraft not based in NYC will have adequate bidders. Put this in MSP/SLC and you'd be surprised.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:54 AM.
Page 6 of 14
« First
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands