![]() |
Originally Posted by NeverFlexTO
(Post 3233595)
I completely agree with you, all unions have there agenda. Having flown at 3 regionals, how ALPA isn’t one big conflict of interest blows my mind
|
Originally Posted by JacksonThunder
(Post 3233596)
This. And each union having an agenda is well within their right. But to say we are “all one” or “in solidarity” is bs. DALPA would screw us over the second they get. I get the scope implications but wouldn’t they want to see their “brothers and sisters” at Delta? Of course not!
|
Originally Posted by NeverFlexTO
(Post 3233568)
People slipping through the cracks doesn’t, and that’s exactly what a flow allows, there were definitely a few bad apples from XJ/CZ that got through that wouldn’t have otherwise if there was no flow. Like I said DL management has no interest in a flow with Endeavor the only reason it’s needed is to get 35 76 seaters back to DCI, if there was any other reason the flow would have been done years ago. The timing of trying to get a flow with 9E while DL is trying to get 35 RJs back is ironic...
|
Originally Posted by gojo
(Post 3233612)
That’s a pretty bold statement. There were many that have been hired at Delta, non flow, that left many shaking their heads in disbelief. There were also many that were turned down that a lot of us couldn’t understand. That being said, I’m not privy to how their interview went either.
|
Originally Posted by Finessed
(Post 3233618)
Oh boohoo tell that to our service members who received the TBNT. Get over yourself.
|
Originally Posted by JacksonThunder
(Post 3233574)
I’d advocate we separate from ALPA. Form our own union, similar to Skywest. ALPA is a racket anyway
|
Originally Posted by JacksonThunder
(Post 3233593)
One union, supposed to be “solidarity”. Meanwhile, one is is advocating for career progression the other is advocating for financial gains that could jeopardize career progression. How is that not a conflict?!
DL could start a flow up today as well...they hire who they hire when they want to hire them. I’m al for progression for EDV folks who are flying delta peeps every day...but that’s between you guys and DL Mgmt....us line pilots have zero say. Flow down agreement tied to less scope....no-friggin way! |
Originally Posted by gojo
(Post 3233639)
Where the heck did that come from? All I’m saying is people slip through the cracks during the interview process as well. And some good people get missed. That’s all. I’m definitely not taking about myself here. But maybe you’re projecting here?
|
Originally Posted by Myfingershurt
(Post 3231510)
You all wanna redo this poll?
|
Originally Posted by JonGoodsell764
(Post 3233708)
If Endeavor thinks they’re getting a flow up without having flow down provisions, let me know when I can stop laughing. Flow isn’t all it’s cracked up to be. Very short sighted IMO unless you’re un-hirable outside of a guaranteed seniority number. Don’t let the 10-15 year bitter RJ captains fool you.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:04 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands