Bye Bye Boeing in Seattle!
#21
Banned
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 248
The IAM knows Boeing is going to do what ever they want regardless of the outcome of the vote. They were right to hold the line on pay and benefits. Now the gov of Washington is saying the state is going to have to compete to keep Boeing in Washington. The ball is now in Washington's court.
Competitive bidding for selecting manufacturing sites would really be interesting!
#22
Yes. They had already offered dramatic tax benefits. Now they will have to do a little better. Boeing was stupid the way they outsourced the 787. Now it's time to see if they will be stupid again. My guess is they will.
#23
Works Every Weekend
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,210
The thread title did.
No, they couldn't have. There's no compromising on an individual basis when your only option is a "yes" or "no" vote. The union leadership let their members down by placing this turd of a deal in front of them. Now we get to see if the two parties can come back to the table and re-negotiate. I'm betting they will. SPEEA voted down an absolute crap-pile of a deal, and re-negotiated another agreement which then passed.
Incorrect. Do you know how much a factory worker at Boeing makes to start? If anyone gets furloughed, it will be the junior people. The low-seniority wages at Boeing are easily made elsewhere.
There's not as much vacation time as you think there is, and there's not as much money before overtime as you think there is. Also, my health insurance at my regional airline is about on par with what I had when I was on Boeing insurance.
Except for the fact that Boeing products made in SC are still coming through Everett for fixes before they are delivered, due to manufacturing issues with the location that has the cheaper workforce.
And the acknowledgement that the outsourcing in the 787 project was a massive failure means that outsourcing the 777X is a legitimate threat....? Or that since Boeing outsourced the 787, then they certainly weren't going to do the same with their next airplane, regardless of the vote?
How, exactly, would their leverage increased when they're committed to a long-term contract? You can have all of the leverage in the world, but unless you're due for negotiations.... you're bound to the last thing you signed.
Likely true.
This. If I remember right, the tax breaks Washington offered Boeing amount to something like $500,000,000 per month.
Management chose to minimize the cost of doing business and unions chose to maximize their wages and benefits. It might seem both could have compromised, but Boeing has other choices too - there are workers elsewhere who could choose to work for less than those in WA state.
They resisted (I see nothing about their contract being 're-opened, this was for future work). Boeing offered a $10,000 signing bonus, having future retirement monies subject to a defined contribution plan, having to pay higher co-pay amounts for healthcare costs. Apparently the prospect of future work was just too much of a sacrifice for these workers who earn about $60-70,000 per year before overtime and with much vacation time.
I can understand the frustration of the workers because they bailed out 787 production after management took a McDonnell-Douglas approach to subcontract out nearly all work except for final assembly and that cost the company billions. The workers also kept the cash flowing with record 737 production. when the company needed that cash due to the drain of revenue shortfalls from delayed deliveries, of paying to correct the manufacture of the 787, and of paying penalties to airlines suffering from delayed deliveries.
This. If I remember right, the tax breaks Washington offered Boeing amount to something like $500,000,000 per month.
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Retired
Posts: 651
Considering the tax cuts that Washington State has given Boeing, the only people left to pay the taxes to support the infrastructure that Boeing uses are the workers.
#25
#26
Banned
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 248
I think you have it backwards. The tax breaks subsidize union pay. If Boeing takes its business elsewhere, the state stands to lose income tax revenue (from workers, not the corporation) including in-state ancillary companies that depend on Boeing for its revenues.
#27
Banned
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 248
Seattle City Councilmember-elect shares radical idea with... | www.kirotv.com
"“The workers should take over the factories, and shut down Boeing’s profit-making machine,” Sawant announced to a cheering crowd of union supporters in Seattle’s Westlake Park Monday night. "
“We can re-tool the machines to produce mass transit like buses, instead of destructive, you know, war machines,” she told KIRO 7.
Just more destruction of the manufacturing sector by unions. Time for Boeing to leave Seattle.
"“The workers should take over the factories, and shut down Boeing’s profit-making machine,” Sawant announced to a cheering crowd of union supporters in Seattle’s Westlake Park Monday night. "
“We can re-tool the machines to produce mass transit like buses, instead of destructive, you know, war machines,” she told KIRO 7.
Just more destruction of the manufacturing sector by unions. Time for Boeing to leave Seattle.
#28
Moderator
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Be careful, you may get what you vote for..
Boeing may look to the MidEast after unions reject Seattle 777X plan - Transport - ArabianBusiness.com
Boeing may look to the MidEast after unions reject Seattle 777X plan - Transport - ArabianBusiness.com
Emirates Airlines has urged Boeing to build the 777X and its components in the US to avoid the issues that bedeviled the 787, according to The Wall Street Journal.
“Tim Clark, president of Emirates, said Boeing should assemble the 777X family in its own facilities to better manage the process and deliver the aircraft on time in 2020,” The WSJ wrote.
“‘All we said to [Boeing] was, ‘Please don’t do to 777X what you did to the [787],’” Mr. Clark said in an interview on the sidelines of the Dubai Air Show, adding that outsourcing the manufacture-and-build process to companies in Asia or Europe might mean Boeing loses quality and control of assembly. “Don’t do that to us,” he said,” The WSJ wrote.
“Qatar Airways Chief Executive Akbar Al Akbar similarly expressed a desire that Boeing assemble the 777X at a single U.S. facility. “Frankly, we would rather everything was built in one place, and I think Boeing from the 787 experience have learnt a lesson,” he said in an interview Tuesday,” reported The Journal.
There is broad consensus that Boeing’s Everett plant is the best place to build the 777X, given its experienced workforce, a mature factory and the continuing challenges of the Charleston 787 plant. But Boeing CEO Jim McNerney’s antipathy toward the IAM specifically and the Washington State business climate generally are “wild cards,” a source familiar with the dynamics tells us.
“Tim Clark, president of Emirates, said Boeing should assemble the 777X family in its own facilities to better manage the process and deliver the aircraft on time in 2020,” The WSJ wrote.
“‘All we said to [Boeing] was, ‘Please don’t do to 777X what you did to the [787],’” Mr. Clark said in an interview on the sidelines of the Dubai Air Show, adding that outsourcing the manufacture-and-build process to companies in Asia or Europe might mean Boeing loses quality and control of assembly. “Don’t do that to us,” he said,” The WSJ wrote.
“Qatar Airways Chief Executive Akbar Al Akbar similarly expressed a desire that Boeing assemble the 777X at a single U.S. facility. “Frankly, we would rather everything was built in one place, and I think Boeing from the 787 experience have learnt a lesson,” he said in an interview Tuesday,” reported The Journal.
There is broad consensus that Boeing’s Everett plant is the best place to build the 777X, given its experienced workforce, a mature factory and the continuing challenges of the Charleston 787 plant. But Boeing CEO Jim McNerney’s antipathy toward the IAM specifically and the Washington State business climate generally are “wild cards,” a source familiar with the dynamics tells us.
#29
Runs with scissors
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,722
So I'm wathcing the evening new tonight, and after they show the Dream Lifter lifing off from the 6100' runway, the go to a story about how the Seattle Times placed an add, asking Boeing to please build the 777X in Seattle.
Front and center on the add, with the words wrapped around it, is a big picture of an airplane...an Airbus 320!
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nati...icle-1.1525007
"The ad, which prominently displays the logo of the Washington Aerospace Partnership, a coalition of business, labor and government groups championing the industry, urges state lawmakers to pass a large-scale roads and transit tax package that Boeing executives have said would make the state a more desirable venue for future projects.
Airbus officials confirmed the plane depicted in the ad is an A320 but declined further comment."
Front and center on the add, with the words wrapped around it, is a big picture of an airplane...an Airbus 320!
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nati...icle-1.1525007
"The ad, which prominently displays the logo of the Washington Aerospace Partnership, a coalition of business, labor and government groups championing the industry, urges state lawmakers to pass a large-scale roads and transit tax package that Boeing executives have said would make the state a more desirable venue for future projects.
Airbus officials confirmed the plane depicted in the ad is an A320 but declined further comment."
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post