![]() |
Originally Posted by TheWeatherman
(Post 2495433)
You mean like it should have always been? You are giving the airlines a break for taking advantage of the Recession by cutting labor costs while making record profits. Now that things are getting back to what they should have been, you considered it better?? You're like one of those Skywest pilots who just voted yes to a contract with little to no raise.
Things are just starting to get back to a respectable level, but we have a long way to go before this community is truly compensated for what they are worth to the national economy. |
Originally Posted by Subpilot
(Post 2494778)
Going back three years ago:
Commuter hotels Good Retention bonuses Why are retention bonuses good? Put it in our pay rate! High starting salary for FOs It's temporary, they start out at year 4. The company can put them back on year 1 tomorrow if they want. It's just a way to get them here and then sh** all over them. Short upgrade It was a good thing, not so much now. People are being forced into the left seat. Total disregard of seniority by the company. 2 bases returned Good, but they should have never been closed. There are more negatives this list covers some of the ones that affect the entire group in a "bad" way. |
Things have definitely improved from a few years ago, but we still have a long way to. Things that still need to happen:
-Roll in bonuses to permanent pay rates for FOs and raise CA pay to be on par with EDV. -Return vacation accrual to the way it was pre-2014 TA. It's absolutely absurd that a pilot should have to wait until they're on pay step 8 to see more than 2 weeks of vacation. -Address QOL issues ranging from poor schedules, an antiquated RSV system, etc... -Quit trying to achieve this overly ambitious growth plan at the pilots' expense of metered flow and QOL hits (staffing shortfalls, which equal no POs/PVDs, JMs, denial of RSV swaps, etc...). I understand that the desire is to be back to our old size, but it shouldn't be at our expense. Especially since it was corporate greed that ran off 1500+ of our pilots in the first place. |
I’d venture to say the ones “happy” about the “improvements” here have less than 3 years on property.
|
The people on here saying how they love flying so much are the ones ruining it for everyone. Those people are the ones willing to get paid ******* money because “hey at least I’m flying an airplane for a living”. It is possible to love flying but also want to get paid accordingly and have good QOL. The OP may or may not find that it’s better in the coroporate world but at least he’s willing to try to get a better life for himself. Things are better than they were but they still have a long ways to go. I agree with most of the OP’s post but I disagree about non rev travel and JM’s. Everybody has a different experience though.
|
Originally Posted by ag386
(Post 2494057)
I agree with HanSoolu. I left envoy for Allegiant 2 years ago and was told what an idiot I was for "walking away from the flow." Looks like I was correct. The flow is bogus and will never work as the envoy recruiters and salesmen claimed it would. I'm in the left seat of the Bus now. Worlds better than anything envoy has to offer.
|
Originally Posted by Purpleanga
(Post 2496018)
If you went to Allagiant 2 years ago that means you were fired from a job or you had no other options due to circumstances like miscalculations, maybe a lateral regional move not working out and you had to get out. Either way you didn’t have a choice. So don’t make it seem like you know what you’re talking about. 2 years ago, allegiant only hired rejects, convicts and dui cases, glad you got lucky tho...
|
Originally Posted by bigtime209
(Post 2496047)
And the cold hard truth is that he would've flowed to AA well before he'll actually see the cockpit of a legacy aircraft. He's obviously still bitter about that fact.
I'm not an Envoy employee but If Allegiant called I would take the opportunity versus waiting to get my number called. |
where did original poster go ?
he signed up on 01-02-18, created and posted only to this thread, and disappeared. uncredible back to regular programming. Reminder to the f ignorant and stupid: Yes, Envoy is a regional. Reminder #2- Regional QOL and pay is not the same as mainline/major QOL. Common APC comments about regionals in general from whiners and crybabies and "me generation"
Todays regional is jet cockpit Day-1. Years ago, regional new hires flew Jetstreams, Embraer EMB 110 Bandeirantes, Metroliners, or Beech 1900's. Steam gauge cockpits and typically never got above FL 180. Forget long domestic or international trips as a regional pilot. A "long trip" was DFW-MAF in the Saab or DFW-LRD in the ATR. today, a new regional hire is logging "jet time" (SIC, yes...) from Day-1. but, Envoy sucks |
Originally Posted by BarrySeal
(Post 2496243)
where did original poster go ?
he signed up on 01-02-18, created and posted only to this thread, and disappeared. uncredible back to regular programming. Reminder to the f ignorant and stupid: Yes, Envoy is a regional. Reminder #2- Regional QOL and pay is not the same as mainline/major QOL. Common APC comments about regionals in general from whiners and crybabies and "me generation"
Todays regional is jet cockpit Day-1. Years ago, regional new hires flew Jetstreams, Embraer EMB 110 Bandeirantes, Metroliners, or Beech 1900's. Steam gauge cockpits and typically never got above FL 180. Forget long domestic or international trips as a regional pilot. A "long trip" was DFW-MAF in the Saab or DFW-LRD in the ATR. today, a new regional hire is logging "jet time" (SIC, yes...) from Day-1. but, Envoy sucks |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:33 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands