|
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 2808068)
FO was on probation, so not much the union can do for him.
|
Originally Posted by Cujo665
(Post 2808099)
once CA gets job back, FO should sue.
|
Originally Posted by Cyio
(Post 2808049)
Outside of the cockpit and nothing the crew could have done.
|
They were both in A Cut Above shirts.
|
Originally Posted by NoValueAviator
(Post 2808517)
They were both in A Cut Above shirts.
Filler.... |
Originally Posted by NoValueAviator
(Post 2808517)
They were both in A Cut Above shirts.
|
Originally Posted by NoValueAviator
(Post 2808517)
They were both in A Cut Above shirts.
|
Originally Posted by CaseTractor
(Post 2809096)
Are these noticeably different, and if so, will you get hassled wearing them? If hassled, what happens?
|
Originally Posted by CaseTractor
(Post 2809096)
Are these noticeably different, and if so, will you get hassled wearing them? If hassled, what happens?
but yes, they are noticeably different. The design of the breast pockets is a dead giveaway to the informed. You are unlikely to get hassled. If you get hassled you'll probably just be told to put on the correct uniform unless the person hassling you really doesn't like you, then maybe step letter I guess? |
Originally Posted by NoValueAviator
(Post 2809560)
lol my post was more intended to poke fun at the guys pretending to know about some secret rogue variable that makes the firings justified
but yes, they are noticeably different. The design of the breast pockets is a dead giveaway to the informed. You are unlikely to get hassled. If you get hassled you'll probably just be told to put on the correct uniform unless the person hassling you really doesn't like you, then maybe step letter I guess? https://www.instagram.com/p/Bo2c5IlAUA0/?utm_source=ig_share_sheet&igshid=1dv5w1nmbzwua |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:57 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands