![]() |
Originally Posted by dragongoliath
(Post 2945489)
I was told the *4 code is restricted for most people.
|
Originally Posted by Chato
(Post 2945491)
It is.. you will get a “security restriction” message.
If you have a concept that works, I can almost guarantee you will get deep DECS you need for *4. |
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 2945432)
It's "this is mine" issue, not "this is ours".
ALPA (well. ENY MEC to be more exact) has no rights to the list. The person with the access is not with Envoy any more. It's 100% his call if he wants to update it or not. Then someone should make a new one and the union should approve it. If this guy moved on and wants to keep it to himself for whatever reason than someone should submit it to the MEC Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by UncreativeUser
(Post 2945591)
Then someone should make a new one and the union should approve it. If this guy moved on and wants to keep it to himself for whatever reason than someone should submit it to the MEC
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Go for it. I just explained the method how to do it. So far, no takers for the job. An average programmer could probably do it in a few days. It's not a complicated job, it's just parsing data. My programming background is in embedded engineering so I can't help. Doing this in assembler would take years. You need someone fluent in perl or similar. Couple of regexps to parse the flow plans, and in perl it would be a bunch of foreach loops to process the resignations. I'm sure they would appreciate a volunteer with the appropriate skills to do it. |
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 2945527)
You give me the script and I'll run it for you.
If you have a concept that works, I can almost guarantee you will get deep DECS you need for *4. |
So what I’m reading is the information ISN’T readily available or accessible.
|
Depart Envoy Arrive American
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 2945594)
The famous "someone".
Go for it. I just explained the method how to do it. So far, no takers for the job. An average programmer could probably do it in a few days. It's not a complicated job, it's just parsing data. My programming background is in embedded engineering so I can't help. Doing this in assembler would take years. You need someone fluent in perl or similar. Couple of regexps to parse the flow plans, and in perl it would be a bunch of foreach loops to process the resignations. I'm sure they would appreciate a volunteer with the appropriate skills to do it. Prolly someone on Java for Excel since Perl is more UNIX based but it sounds like you know what you’re doing? I sure as hell don’t when it comes to this list. My point is, is that we should have a dedicated paid union representative to have an interactive list that is not only on excel but can be interactive on the web, kind of like the new contract wiki we have. You just plug in your ID like usual and the graphs and data populate through Safari or Excel if you want to remain old school. No one is going to do that for free. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Cliff notes: It would have to be pulled and compiled from multiple sources by a single person then sorted and arranged with programming. Also assuming it would have to be approved by Alpa prior to dissemination in order to be considered “real” and not fake news. Hell, this feels like UAW vs GM/Ford pre 1990.
|
Originally Posted by Gooch
(Post 2945695)
Cliff notes: It would have to be pulled and compiled from multiple sources by a single person then sorted and arranged with programming. Also assuming it would have to be approved by Alpa prior to dissemination in order to be considered “real” and not fake news. Hell, this feels like UAW vs GM/Ford pre 1990.
The sources are the flow plan, and access to deep DECS. You could do it without deep DECS if you'd get a list of people who retired/resigned/deceased. I think the chair of the Membership Committee would be a good place to ask if such list exists. He is a good dude. Call him and see what he says. I don't think anyone would really miss the "Should I go" features. Just a list that's accurate and gets updated would make most people very happy. If you can create one and show your work, I can guarantee the union would help you support it. The only official list is Appendix A of the CBA. It gets updated twice a year. |
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 2946020)
The list that gets published is "fake news".
The sources are the flow plan, and access to deep DECS. You could do it without deep DECS if you'd get a list of people who retired/resigned/deceased. I think the chair of the Membership Committee would be a good place to ask if such list exists. He is a good dude. Call him and see what he says. I don't think anyone would really miss the "Should I go" features. Just a list that's accurate and gets updated would make most people very happy. If you can create one and show your work, I can guarantee the union would help you support it. The only official list is Appendix A of the CBA. It gets updated twice a year. |
Originally Posted by THKooj
(Post 2946275)
You've had a huge shift in the way you view your job. When you initially started posting here, you were extremely pro company and it has degraded ever since. I've noticed that you applied to Spirit in another thread. Looks like you've officially hit rock bottom in applying to a carrier that essentially is on par with Mesa. Dude, you have a job at American Airlines. What in the world HAPPENED to you?
|
Originally Posted by THKooj
(Post 2946275)
You've had a huge shift in the way you view your job. When you initially started posting here, you were extremely pro company and it has degraded ever since. I've noticed that you applied to Spirit in another thread. Looks like you've officially hit rock bottom in applying to a carrier that essentially is on par with Mesa. Dude, you have a job at American Airlines. What in the world HAPPENED to you?
|
Originally Posted by THKooj
(Post 2946275)
You've had a huge shift in the way you view your job. When you initially started posting here, you were extremely pro company and it has degraded ever since. I've noticed that you applied to Spirit in another thread. Looks like you've officially hit rock bottom in applying to a carrier that essentially is on par with Mesa. Dude, you have a job at American Airlines. What in the world HAPPENED to you?
I have a job realistically, at AA, in 6 years. That is after most of the hiring wave has passed, so I would be stuck at the bottom for a long time. I'm not 22 years old. I have a time constraint that steers my decisions. I'm nowhere near rock bottom. Getting hired somewhere outside the flow has been my plan all along. Spirit would be a great place to hang my hat. DFW base, great QOL, and good pay. Comparing them to Mesa is a joke. |
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 2946383)
I'm still happy here. I fly a lot, I make good money, and I live in base.
I have a job realistically, at AA, in 6 years. That is after most of the hiring wave has passed, so I would be stuck at the bottom for a long time. I'm not 22 years old. I have a time constraint that steers my decisions. I'm nowhere near rock bottom. Getting hired somewhere outside the flow has been my plan all along. Spirit would be a great place to hang my hat. DFW base, great QOL, and good pay. Comparing them to Mesa is a joke. :eek: did I just agree with dera? |
Originally Posted by AeroEnvoy
(Post 2944906)
Dacuj made his way out of Talk Airline and into APC
|
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 2946383)
I'm still happy here. I fly a lot, I make good money, and I live in base.
I have a job realistically, at AA, in 6 years. That is after most of the hiring wave has passed, so I would be stuck at the bottom for a long time. I'm not 22 years old. I have a time constraint that steers my decisions. I'm nowhere near rock bottom. Getting hired somewhere outside the flow has been my plan all along. Spirit would be a great place to hang my hat. DFW base, great QOL, and good pay. Comparing them to Mesa is a joke. |
Depart Envoy Arrive American
What do y’all think, is spirit a good option if you’re under 28-30?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by UncreativeUser
(Post 2946585)
What do y’all think, is spirit a good option if you’re under 28-30?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk The two downsides in my opinion are it’s seems to be a pretty young pilot groups so fewer retirements and no long international. Those vary based on age and desires though. |
Originally Posted by UncreativeUser
(Post 2946585)
What do y’all think, is spirit a good option if you’re under 28-30?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by UncreativeUser
(Post 2946585)
What do y’all think, is spirit a good option if you’re under 28-30?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Yeah, it's only a ton of money, not a crap ton. Still sounds like a win to me. |
Originally Posted by ninerdriver
(Post 2946647)
You'd make a ton of money, and you'd retire super senior. You wouldn't have to worry about flowing back to Envoy once AA runs out of money.
Yeah, it's only a ton of money, not a crap ton. Still sounds like a win to me. |
Originally Posted by ninerdriver
(Post 2946647)
You'd make a ton of money, and you'd retire super senior. You wouldn't have to worry about flowing back to Envoy once AA runs out of money.
Yeah, it's only a ton of money, not a crap ton. Still sounds like a win to me. |
Originally Posted by black cat
(Post 2946724)
Absolutely. Spirit is a good gig with some awesome QOL items going on for them. But make no mistake, there is big money to be made at AA. There are an insane amount of retirements on the horizon. And we have more than a few guys making over half a million a year. And we have plenty of guys making big money being home as much as possible. Either way, you can't go wrong. You want ultimate QOL, go to Spirit. You want less QOL and big money, go AA. Just depends on what you're after.
AA's old guard is so obsessed with pay rates the company hood winks them on soft pay and QOL. |
Originally Posted by black cat
(Post 2946724)
Absolutely. Spirit is a good gig with some awesome QOL items going on for them. But make no mistake, there is big money to be made at AA. There are an insane amount of retirements on the horizon. And we have more than a few guys making over half a million a year. And we have plenty of guys making big money being home as much as possible. Either way, you can't go wrong. You want ultimate QOL, go to Spirit. You want less QOL and big money, go AA. Just depends on what you're after.
|
Originally Posted by black cat
(Post 2946724)
Absolutely. Spirit is a good gig with some awesome QOL items going on for them. But make no mistake, there is big money to be made at AA. There are an insane amount of retirements on the horizon. And we have more than a few guys making over half a million a year. And we have plenty of guys making big money being home as much as possible. Either way, you can't go wrong. You want ultimate QOL, go to Spirit. You want less QOL and big money, go AA. Just depends on what you're after.
|
Originally Posted by THKooj
(Post 2946943)
You've got it partially right. There is big money to be made at AA. The whole argument about going to Spirit is absurd when you have the opportunity to fly for AA. Unless you don't have a degree, have checkride failures or skeletons in the closet. Those are 99% of your hires at Spirit and they wouldn't cut it at an Envoy interview.
|
Is there any way that Spirit will still be in business in 7 years from now?
If you think so, then you really need to look at the history of this industry. Spirit is a fun place to hang out for a couple years, but there is absolutely zero chance that they will be in business 10 years from now. |
Originally Posted by THKooj
(Post 2946943)
You've got it partially right. There is big money to be made at AA. The whole argument about going to Spirit is absurd when you have the opportunity to fly for AA. Unless you don't have a degree, have checkride failures or skeletons in the closet. Those are 99% of your hires at Spirit and they wouldn't cut it at an Envoy interview.
|
Originally Posted by daOldMan
(Post 2946981)
Is there any way that Spirit will still be in business in 7 years from now?
If you think so, then you really need to look at the history of this industry. Spirit is a fun place to hang out for a couple years, but there is absolutely zero chance that they will be in business 10 years from now. |
Originally Posted by Varsity
(Post 2946999)
It's more likely Spirit buys AA than Spirit goes out of business.
Only 2 airlines have made money every day since Sept 1st 2001, that's spirit and southwest. Aa will be in bk court 2021 but no later than 2022,. Just an opinion. |
I hate to say it, but IF AA is indeed showing up Spirit, it is because AA is now chasing the same customers because the AA product has deteriorated.
|
You have jumped the shark. People don’t take you seriously because you are so far off base and transparent. Throwing out statements like above only makes it seem like you can’t be objective.
|
A CA with less than 2 years to flow just left his notice. He is going to Spirit.
|
Originally Posted by Cyio
(Post 2947157)
You have jumped the shark. People don’t take you seriously because you are so far off base and transparent. Throwing out statements like above only makes it seem like you can’t be objective.
|
Originally Posted by THKooj
(Post 2946943)
The whole argument about going to Spirit is absurd when you have the opportunity to fly for AA.
|
Originally Posted by Slow2Final
(Post 2947461)
Didn't you say before that being hired at Envoy was the same as being hired at American? How did that turn into "the opportunity to fly for AA"? Is it guaranteed or not?
|
It must be weird living in a world where it’s worth arguing about whether or not we work at AA when we’re still cashing baby sized checks and putting up with crappy work rules lol
|
Originally Posted by THKooj
(Post 2947497)
Thanks for calling me out on this. I just worded it wrong. You are absolutely AA from Day One. And everything else I said still stands. You've got to have something wrong upstairs to work for a lowball type operator like Spirit when you are already AA.
|
For the record, our work rules are actually better in some areas than AA (i.e if we are removed/ misconnected during sequence and resume mid sequence, than we just resume it and fly as usual. AA puts you on reserve if you misconnect)
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Varsity
(Post 2946808)
Disagree. AA's soft pay rules are probably the worst in the industry, worse than spirit. All open time at Spirit is 200%, pay protection, great rigs.
AA's old guard is so obsessed with pay rates the company hood winks them on soft pay and QOL. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:14 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands