![]() |
Mergers
I said long ago that the regional industry would eventually consolidate through shut downs, buyouts, consolidations and mergers. We’ve seen a few shutdowns get accelerated due to Coronavirus. This industry wide slowdown provides the perfect opportunity for them to right size the mothership.... but don’t think for a second that it stops there.
my recommendation would be to spool up the mergers committees on all three WO’s and get those guys trained at National. |
Originally Posted by Cujo665
(Post 3027296)
I said long ago that the regional industry would eventually consolidate through shut downs, buyouts, consolidations and mergers. We’ve seen a few shutdowns get accelerated due to Coronavirus. This industry wide slowdown provides the perfect opportunity for them to right size the mothership.... but don’t think for a second that it stops there.
my recommendation would be to spool up the mergers committees on all three WO’s and get those guys trained at National. |
Originally Posted by Cujo665
(Post 3027296)
I said long ago that the regional industry would eventually consolidate through shut downs, buyouts, consolidations and mergers. We’ve seen a few shutdowns get accelerated due to Coronavirus. This industry wide slowdown provides the perfect opportunity for them to right size the mothership.... but don’t think for a second that it stops there.
my recommendation would be to spool up the mergers committees on all three WO’s and get those guys trained at National. |
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 3027338)
I heard they nominated a mergers chair on our last MEC meeting.
|
Originally Posted by highfarfast
(Post 3027342)
Is that your way of telling MEGA that Cujo was right?
Cujos predictions have just been common sense. He might be wrong about who actually will merge though. |
Originally Posted by Cujo665
(Post 3027296)
I said long ago that the regional industry would eventually consolidate through shut downs, buyouts, consolidations and mergers. We’ve seen a few shutdowns get accelerated due to Coronavirus. This industry wide slowdown provides the perfect opportunity for them to right size the mothership.... but don’t think for a second that it stops there.
my recommendation would be to spool up the mergers committees on all three WO’s and get those guys trained at National. |
Regionals have been reliably merging/shutdown since the mergers of the legacies.
predicting more doesn’t make you a prognosticator but instead a student of current events. |
Originally Posted by pitchattitude
(Post 3027368)
Will be interesting to see. Might be some savings to be had with a merger, but without some fences, there will be a huge churn of training and associated costs. Of course Envoy is already looking at a lot of training costs if they park more 145s and end up with mostly 175s.
|
Piedvoy has always been obvious from an economic standpoint. AA doesn’t take its responsibility to shareholders very seriously though.
|
Originally Posted by NoValueAviator
(Post 3027699)
Piedvoy has always been obvious from an economic standpoint. AA doesn’t take its responsibility to shareholders very seriously though.
|
Originally Posted by Cujo665
(Post 3027747)
What was obvious to shareholders was AAG effectively used one WO regional to drive down costs at the other two.
|
Originally Posted by Cujo665
(Post 3027747)
What was obvious to shareholders was AAG effectively used one WO regional to drive down costs at the other two.
|
Originally Posted by NoValueAviator
(Post 3027752)
I can see why PSA hasn't been merged. .
|
The “One regional to rule them all” model obviously CAN be done. AMR did it. On the other hand, AMR was in the process of breaking up that model even before they went bankrupt. USAir came in and clearly didn’t like that model either. I don’t know all the financials behind it, and obviously times have changed, but I’d be surprised if they had that big of a change of heart and merged all three. I could see Piedvoy.
I’m a little surprised that they are still giving flying to non-WO. They are paying us all to stay home, why are they also shoveling money out the door to other contractors? I’m perfectly happy to get paid to do nothing, and I have friends at those airlines, so I hope they don’t run pulled out from under them. That said, I’m surprised AAG lawyers haven’t found their way out of those contracts yet. |
Originally Posted by But seriously
(Post 3027888)
That said, I’m surprised AAG lawyers haven’t found their way out of those contracts yet.
|
Originally Posted by But seriously
(Post 3027888)
The “One regional to rule them all” model obviously CAN be done. AMR did it. On the other hand, AMR was in the process of breaking up that model even before they went bankrupt. USAir came in and clearly didn’t like that model either. I don’t know all the financials behind it, and obviously times have changed, but I’d be surprised if they had that big of a change of heart and merged all three. I could see Piedvoy.
I’m a little surprised that they are still giving flying to non-WO. They are paying us all to stay home, why are they also shoveling money out the door to other contractors? I’m perfectly happy to get paid to do nothing, and I have friends at those airlines, so I hope they don’t run pulled out from under them. That said, I’m surprised AAG lawyers haven’t found their way out of those contracts yet. they threatened to sell it every four years at amendment rounds, but there was never a move to break it up. they did start increasing the outsourcing, but not until they were already in bankruptcy getting direction from their future new masters.... The vendors are in for a tougher ride than the WO’s |
Originally Posted by NoValueAviator
(Post 3027699)
Piedvoy has always been obvious from an economic standpoint. AA doesn’t take its responsibility to shareholders very seriously though.
|
Originally Posted by Cujo665
(Post 3027955)
When did AMR try to break up Eagle before the BK?
they threatened to sell it every four years at amendment rounds, but there was never a move to break it up. they did start increasing the outsourcing, but not until they were already in bankruptcy getting direction from their future new masters.... The vendors are in for a tougher ride than the WO’s |
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 3027974)
PSAMont is a much more plausible scenario.
Envoy and Piedmont pilots operate aircraft of the same type rating. PSA and Piedmont is the more plausible merger scenario. . . #Peevoy |
Originally Posted by Throwitaway
(Post 3028035)
Envoy and Piedmont ground employees provide the same above and below wing services.
Envoy and Piedmont pilots operate aircraft of the same type rating. PSA and Piedmont is the more plausible merger scenario. . . #Peevoy I have always thought it would be PSA and Piedmont to merge to keep the relative size of the eventual two WOs close. #PSAMont |
Originally Posted by Throwitaway
(Post 3028035)
Envoy and Piedmont ground employees provide the same above and below wing services.
Envoy and Piedmont pilots operate aircraft of the same type rating. PSA and Piedmont is the more plausible merger scenario. . . #Peevoy |
Mergers are about saving money. Whatever costs them the least amount of money and will realize them the biggest savings is what they’ll do.
|
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 3028069)
It's a lot easier to merge carriers with different fleet types. You can just move the manuals over, and that's it. All PDT pilots would have to be retrained on Envoy 145 procedures, the planes would have to be bridge checked when moving over, we use DECS, PSA and Piedmont both(correct me if I'm wrong) use FLICA, and so on.
what’s flica? Is that a rap song? signed: a piedmont pilot. PS: we got our manuals from envoy. |
Piedmonsters are good people. I'd merge with them.
|
Originally Posted by Varsity
(Post 3028382)
Piedmonsters are good people. I'd merge with them.
|
Originally Posted by Throwitaway
(Post 3028386)
Yeah? Dovetail them in based on relative seniority? Or staple them to the bottom? How would you like to see the seniority lists merged if you were in charge?
And there's a lot of respect between PDT and Envoy unions, I'm sure they would find a good solution for the SLI. Even though it really isn't the plausible merger any time soon. |
Originally Posted by Lahey
(Post 3028340)
what’s flica? Is that a rap song?
signed: a piedmont pilot. PS: we got our manuals from envoy. |
Originally Posted by Lahey
(Post 3028340)
what’s flica? Is that a rap song?
signed: a piedmont pilot. PS: we got our manuals from envoy. we'll get along just fine if so. |
Originally Posted by BigZ
(Post 3028443)
so what do you have? Paper bidding with chalk and blackboard roasters? Check in with punching a time card at the ops?
we'll get along just fine if so. (seriously, still an option to fax bids in here at Piedmont) |
I'd prefer not to merge, but if we did I would hope it was with Piedmont. I always liked that pilot group.
|
Originally Posted by johnboat
(Post 3028466)
I'd prefer not to merge, but if we did I would hope it was with Piedmont. I always liked that pilot group.
|
I'm not sure if/when/how any unification of the 3 W/Os will ever happen, but some of you guys need to understand that mergers between the 3 W/Os are not all about the pilots and the aircraft.
A big function performed by the regionals is providing all the ground services at all the outstations. Envoy has people at places we don't fly to, and we've gone to many places that were handled by Envoy, PDT, heck even TSA ground crew. When the number crunchers start calculating their cost savings from merging our companies, the decision will be based on if there are any savings to be made by putting all those personnel under one management team. Since there is very little overlap between any of the 3 companies in that regard, it would be hard to see much saving coming from merging any of us. The transition and training costs could easily overwhelm it. |
Originally Posted by Tyrion
(Post 3028520)
I'm not sure if/when/how any unification of the 3 W/Os will ever happen, but some of you guys need to understand that mergers between the 3 W/Os are not all about the pilots and the aircraft.
A big function performed by the regionals is providing all the ground services at all the outstations. Envoy has people at places we don't fly to, and we've gone to many places that were handled by Envoy, PDT, heck even TSA ground crew. When the number crunchers start calculating their cost savings from merging our companies, the decision will be based on if there are any savings to be made by putting all those personnel under one management team. Since there is very little overlap between any of the 3 companies in that regard, it would be hard to see much saving coming from merging any of us. The transition and training costs could easily overwhelm it. |
Originally Posted by ImmaAHole
(Post 3028920)
What would save them a ton of money is to shut down Envoy and get rid of the unionized rampers. Give the E175's to Piedmont, get rid of all the 50 seaters.
|
Originally Posted by ImmaAHole
(Post 3028920)
What would save them a ton of money is to shut down Envoy and get rid of the unionized rampers. Give the E175's to Piedmont, get rid of all the 50 seaters.
you got more jokes? |
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 3028394)
Can't staple any more.
And there's a lot of respect between PDT and Envoy unions, I'm sure they would find a good solution for the SLI. Even though it really isn't the plausible merger any time soon. |
Are we trying to pick a PDT-ENY fight now? WTF? They are two great companies with great pilot groups, and we’ll all get to know each other much better as we chat at the unemployment offices in the lines at the soup kitchens.
|
Originally Posted by MqWhistleblower
(Post 3028960)
You guys were flying props until early 19, struggling to get the 145 program approved by the FAA, and now you want the 175 at Piedmont? Hahaha you actually made me laugh
you got more jokes? |
Originally Posted by But seriously
(Post 3028998)
Are we trying to pick a PDT-ENY fight now? WTF? They are two great companies with great pilot groups, and we’ll all get to know each other much better as we chat at the unemployment offices in the lines at the soup kitchens.
|
Originally Posted by But seriously
(Post 3028998)
Are we trying to pick a PDT-ENY fight now? WTF? They are two great companies with great pilot groups, and we’ll all get to know each other much better as we chat at the unemployment offices in the lines at the soup kitchens.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:09 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands