![]() |
Oh Eaglefly.....your hate for all things Eagle-voy, is strong. The 250 went prior to 2013 by the way homie:)
The Cuuj means well. We all got spit in the face by this flow hiccup, but he is right, we have sent a lot more pilots than so far called for. I still see a lot of PSA guys running in here and bashing envoy every chance they can. Very unbecoming. |
Originally Posted by PilotCrusader
(Post 1914739)
Oh Eaglefly.....your hate for all things Eagle-voy, is strong. The 250 went prior to 2013 by the way homie:)
The Cuuj means well. We all got spit in the face by this flow hiccup, but he is right, we have sent a lot more pilots than so far called for. I still see a lot of PSA guys running in here and bashing envoy every chance they can. Very unbecoming. Bashing envoy??? Who from PSA does that. Besides first class. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Cujo665
(Post 1914561)
The company had a rare opportunity to turn it around. Instead they squandered it.
|
Originally Posted by Bpflyerone
(Post 1914589)
Ignorant statement when 5 of 7 bases have closed since 08.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Boston LA San Juan Miami NYC (Laguardia & JFK) |
[QUOTE=sublime259;1914751Coming here right now, however, will not lead to the quick movement promised by the 2.5 yr upgrade/6 yr flow from our upper-management. [/QUOTE]
The individual making this statement would not qualify as any sort of "upper manager" in the chain of command as far as who makes the decisions that could effect actual change. I'm surprised he actually wrote it considering the hoops that need to be jumped through and assumptions that had to be made to reach those numbers, and the additional problem there were no real solutions ready to be implemented to reach the objectives. But then, our managers like making absurd assumptions when it comes to things like this. Time To Flow chart, anyone? Earnings Chart related to flow? Yes, those are working out just fine... We'll just add this latest batch of bad math to the pile already in the fireplace. |
Originally Posted by RyanP
(Post 1914789)
Yup, 5 (large) bases closed since I started. Many people moved and bought homes, more than once for. This place use to be the largest regional and pretty stable with over 3200 pilots.
Boston LA San Juan Miami NYC (Laguardia & JFK) Good Luck! |
Originally Posted by sublime259
(Post 1914751)
I agree with this statement. I've been a pretty big supporter of the future of envoy and I do still think it will get much better once we are right-sized. Coming here right now, however, will not lead to the quick movement promised by the 2.5 yr upgrade/6 yr flow from our upper-management. They had a pretty damn good opportunity to change things, but yes, they did squander it. As most everyone on here knows, the airline industry is very fluid so we'll see what the future holds.
I'll stay nice and just end this post here. |
Originally Posted by RJ Pilot
(Post 1914874)
That and popping kids left and right aren't the smartest things to do when working for a regional.
Good Luck! |
Originally Posted by PilotCrusader
(Post 1914739)
Oh Eaglefly.....your hate for all things Eagle-voy, is strong. The 250 went prior to 2013 by the way homie
I have no idea what orifice you pulled that 250 number from. I don't hate Envoy, but I DO take issue with deliberate misinformation. Wilson's letter stated that 481 Envoy pilots flowed from January 2013, but AA didn't even start street hiring (the app window opened 10/1/13 IIRC), nor did ANY of the 824 pilots (mixed with the first class of street hires) hit AA property until 12/3/13. That means perhaps 150 or 1/3 of that number represented had nothing to do with meeting 824/new-hire quota's as those pilots were part of a different flow mechanism that was required by arbitration and there were NO street hires until that 12/3 class and virtually ALL of 2013 had nothing to do with the equation.
Originally Posted by PilotCrusader
(Post 1914739)
The Cuuj means well. We all got spit in the face by this flow hiccup, but he is right, we have sent a lot more pilots than so far called for.
You see, when you guys spread this stuff and then flip-flop like a freshly caught carp lying on the dock, what confidence can one get in ANYTHING you say ?
Originally Posted by PilotCrusader
(Post 1914739)
I still see a lot of PSA guys running in here and bashing envoy every chance they can. Very unbecoming.
|
Originally Posted by sublime259
(Post 1914751)
I agree with this statement. I've been a pretty big supporter of the future of envoy and I do still think it will get much better once we are right-sized. Coming here right now, however, will not lead to the quick movement promised by the 2.5 yr upgrade/6 yr flow from our upper-management. They had a pretty damn good opportunity to change things, but yes, they did squander it. As most everyone on here knows, the airline industry is very fluid so we'll see what the future holds.
If they had, most of these discussions wouldn't need to take place. What's occurring now is really no different then what has in the past. Different people, sure, but essentially the same old story. That's why I think it's extremely unlikely the regional industry will remain viable for more than a few more years without the need to morph it into something else and much smaller, whatever that is. Right now, the industry and Envoy are just kicking the can (sometimes forward, sometimes around in circles), but eventually there won't be a can worth kicking anymore. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:30 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands