![]() |
Originally Posted by tunes
(Post 1683260)
How do you lose something you never had?
Maybe madon could start on the AA side instead of putting "facts" out there which are obvious..... You all knew what was coming last time and the same will this time.... Mason though continues to keep you all believing he's in the know. He's less in the know then you all realize. |
Originally Posted by Mason32
(Post 1683255)
Wow, If ever there were an example of looking at things through rose colored glasses.
Try Losing 13 years of mainline pay, seniority, benefits, retirement contributions AFTER accepting a crappy deal with promises of flowing in 2-4 years. Further, you are looking at the wrong group. Ask the FOs who supported that contract so they'd upgrade quicker and instead spent 11 years in the right seat. You're saying a few hundred numbers guys going over 13 years later was a good trade for the 1600 guys who stayed in the right seat on a concessionary contract. And look at Republic. They've "held the line" yet every day they lose more and more money as they work under their old contract. It would have been better to do an average deal 5 years ago than continue their current path. Time doesn't stand still for a line in the sand. |
Originally Posted by Jvw700
(Post 1683261)
In fairness nobody could have predicted what was to happen September 11 2001 or circa 2007-2008 looking back at it though we now know that anything can happen and a decent contract is more valuable than flow.
You are correct about one thing. A decent contract is more valuable than a flow program. |
Originally Posted by Mason32
(Post 1683255)
Wow, If ever there were an example of looking at things through rose colored glasses.
Try Losing 13 years of mainline pay, seniority, benefits, retirement contributions AFTER accepting a crappy deal with promises of flowing in 2-4 years. Further, you are looking at the wrong group. Ask the FOs who supported that contract so they'd upgrade quicker and instead spent 11 years in the right seat. You're saying a few hundred numbers guys going over 13 years later was a good trade for the 1600 guys who stayed in the right seat on a concessionary contract. Seniority, they left eagle with vacation sen for vacation, relative seniority wise, they really lost nothing. Retirement, not too much of a lose there, eagle match was 100% of 8%. Ask the FOs that supported the deal, what FOs? Prrtty much all the FOs that supported the deal upgraded in 3 years. The 10 year aFOs came after the contract. I keep correcting what you wrote and you keep adding stuff. This all started with you asking how it worked out for the flows, the answer, GREAT. You keeping painting the picture that the last flow/16year deal was a travesty and screwed the people that was at eagle when it was signed, when in fact quite the opposite is true for those folks. |
Originally Posted by tunes
(Post 1683260)
How do you lose something you never had?
They were promised something, and it wasn't delivered. Like it or not, that is a loss. Time value of money |
So all those that say the 16 year deal was a good deal have to also say that what happened 9 11 was a good thing.
|
Originally Posted by buddies8
(Post 1683279)
So all those that say the 16 year deal was a good deal have to also say that what happened 9 11 was a good thing.
|
Originally Posted by buddies8
(Post 1683279)
So all those that say the 16 year deal was a good deal have to also say that what happened 9 11 was a good thing.
|
You guys do know this is a forum, and your personal squabbles can be hashed out in their own thread right?
|
Originally Posted by Feng
(Post 1683274)
Again, I'm only presenting what is wrong with your posts. Post 911, many, if not most awaiting flow made MORE than the bottom 20% of AA FOs. Some even more than your CAs. Not to mention their QOL was astronomically higher than being at the bottom 3% of the AA list for 15 years. So thats pay.
Seniority, they left eagle with vacation sen for vacation, relative seniority wise, they really lost nothing. Retirement, not too much of a lose there, eagle match was 100% of 8%. Ask the FOs that supported the deal, what FOs? Prrtty much all the FOs that supported the deal upgraded in 3 years. The 10 year aFOs came after the contract. I keep correcting what you wrote and you keep adding stuff. This all started with you asking how it worked out for the flows, the answer, GREAT. You're comparing their 8% match to our defined pension (at the time) plus the 401k matching? I got a check for well over $100k for what was just given up in BK. How did the Numbered guys still at Eagle do? If they got $10k they did well. You really want to continue this debate about how much better off they'd have been being here 13 years ago, instead of waiting? Our reserve system is still better than their best line, especially at our pay rates. Go ask some of the new guys on reserve, they'll tell you the very worst day here is better than the very best day they ever had at Eagle. Spin it how you want. They took a bad deal in 97 on false promises. It absolutely worked out for some, but not for the majority. Go ask the 400-500 guys at Envoy that are now too old to flow and recoup the pay if the flow through worked for them. 13 years ago, they'd have come over. There are almost as many who've declined as numbered guys who flowed. I could be off a bit, my Envoy stuff is second hand, so I don't actually know if it's 400-500 declining. It's just what I was told. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:01 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands