|
Originally Posted by thump
(Post 1807593)
72 hour lines sounds like you are overstaffed relative to your peers. The difference between 72 hours at Envoy vs 85 hours at RAH represents about 500 pilots worth of flying at Envoy. Whoah!
And how the hell has this thread last this long with out RJ Pilot chiming in? Seriously an Envoy thread shows up and he has like this 6th sense to come in with his good lucks. Oh well, he's probably off in his shiny GV going to places like Kai Tak airport in Hong Kong. |
Originally Posted by prex8390
(Post 1807498)
dont go anywhere that offers a signing bonus. end of story.
If they have to throw a "bonus" at you to get you to show up, you're probably making a bad decision. |
Originally Posted by thump
(Post 1807593)
72 hour lines sounds like you are overstaffed relative to your peers. The difference between 72 hours at Envoy vs 85 hours at RAH represents about 500 pilots worth of flying at Envoy. Whoah!
|
Originally Posted by rickt86
(Post 1807420)
Rah may have no cx pay but with these awful lines at envoy you will face equal money loss and same long upgrade.
Ask envoy recruitment at events what's going to be done to fix these awful lines and upgrade time. Till management address that I'd highly advice going elsewhere. I see most lines as 72 hours pay and 13 or less days off with carryover. That's awful with a 7-8 year upgrade. If management doesn't address botH these problems Idk why Anyone would waist their time coming here!!! |
Originally Posted by thump
(Post 1807593)
72 hour lines sounds like you are overstaffed relative to your peers. The difference between 72 hours at Envoy vs 85 hours at RAH represents about 500 pilots worth of flying at Envoy. Whoah!
|
Originally Posted by highflyer0685
(Post 1807624)
Personally I wouldn't go to either of these airlines but if you had to pick I'd go to RAH....... at least they have a spine and know what the word "No" means when it comes to a ****** contract.
|
Originally Posted by rickt86
(Post 1807580)
Guess no one cares about flow through either, 3 new hires today, all erj Dfw.
Now that they've forced this pile of manure on us, they're going to have to do a hard sell to get anyone on the street to eat this sandwich. Good luck Jerry. Hope you choke on it. |
Originally Posted by pete2800
(Post 1807610)
This right here is spot on.
If they have to throw a "bonus" at you to get you to show up, you're probably making a bad decision. |
Originally Posted by eaglefly
(Post 1807531)
So you're saying it's better to lead innocent lambs to slaughter if it improves your situation ?
......and some say this profession isn't totally screwed. :cool: Lambs to the slaughter? How melodramatic. As if other regionals are "better" at much anything. Even after all that has happened, Envoy still has a contract that's better than most. The others currently have low upgrade time as a leading reason to apply there, but that won't last, and if one isn't hired soon that upgrade will be pretty far down the road. |
Originally Posted by AdiosMikeFox
(Post 1807503)
And until you stop telling people to come to envoy your situation will not improve.
No new bodies = bad staffing = bad schedules and no upgrades. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:56 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands