![]() |
Originally Posted by PilotJ3
(Post 2147085)
The only way I could agree on this is if AAG do a list by Company Seniority. And people will flow according to their company seniority, not by their WO seniority.
In all likelihood, this will occur anyway, but at the behest of the AAG, not three fragmented pilot groups and when all their ducks are lined up. In that case, they would negate any increased strength by a long-term contract that supersedes the present separate contracts (including the Envoy PP) and agreement by all groups to flow at a nominal rate and by seniority, but that seniority will be a by-product of arbitration (SLI). This is what occurred in the past with the BizEx acquisition. As Envoy shrinks, I could see the merger of Piedmont which brings some very senior pilots, but a smaller group EXACTLY like the Simmons/BizEx merger and then run 2 WO's or perhaps merge all three. The other option is to play whack a mole like now by jacking around flying and assets as each carrier shrinks at different rates. Considering ALL regionals will shrink as the pool of available pilots continues to evaporate (which is already now a puddle), it's not a matter of if, but how fast the AA WO's collapse and then morph. On a related note, AA is in the analysts doghouse with a share price target of a feeble $19 making all those billions in stock buy back lost money and it's becoming increasingly obvious AA may be becoming another house of cards with grossly excessive debt and falling revenue buttressed by bad decisions. It's just my opinion, but hinging your future on AA as THE place to be stability and compensation wise may be a mistake. I think another of the bad decisions in play that has yet to flop is AAG's doubling down on RJ's as opposed to Delta and United moving in the other direction where there are future resources. We could be in the beginning to middle stages of another trip to the past and AA's past is very troubled indeed. |
Originally Posted by HighFlight
(Post 2146765)
I'd lean more towards:
$60 $62 $65 $70 I second those payrates or go out of business. |
Originally Posted by chrisreedrules
(Post 2146775)
To be clear, I'm not arguing against higher pay. Because it is simply what the market is demanding. But to compare us to doctors is ridiculous. We don't incur the amount of debt nor are we required to go through the same type of schooling doctors are. And this job certainly isn't brain surgery.
|
Originally Posted by Reservist
(Post 2147285)
Haven't flight instructed many MDs have you.
|
Originally Posted by AdiosMikeFox
(Post 2146956)
So long as the regional pilots keep showing up for work and keep falling over each other for the "quick upgrade" or SJS the company leadership will continue to do the least it possibly can for the employee groups. As we've seen, only when they desperately need pilots do they start throwing out bonuses or raising pay, and not a second sooner than necessary. And note - those bonuses are temporary. As soon as they find they don't need them or find a way around them the extra cash is gone. That could happen a lot of ways, and one of them is consolidation.
|
Originally Posted by chrisreedrules
(Post 2146775)
To be clear, I'm not arguing against higher pay. Because it is simply what the market is demanding. But to compare us to doctors is ridiculous. We don't incur the amount of debt nor are we required to go through the same type of schooling doctors are. And this job certainly isn't brain surgery.
You make your money in dealing with abnormal or emergency situations where you are required to do it correctly. This means that you have to have a lawyer level understanding of all the rules and regulations as well as an encyclopedic mastery of your flight manuals in addition to everything you would have learned in an undergraduate aviation degree. If we actually enforced the rules, there would be a gross amount of malpractice (the equivalence of it). So, please don't say it isn't brain surgery or some other analogy like it. If you can't explain supercooled droplets in theory and practice like you would hear in a college science class, then you are dangerous by virtue of academic insufficiency. Demeaning our own profession is a big problem for us which is why regional pilots get treated like garbage (it's their own fault). Act respectable, demand respect, and know everything there is to know. If you think the job is easy, then you are probably complacent or simply inexperienced. |
Originally Posted by HighFlight
(Post 2146765)
I'd lean more towards:
$60 $62 $65 $70 |
Originally Posted by chrisreedrules
(Post 2146775)
To be clear, I'm not arguing against higher pay. Because it is simply what the market is demanding. But to compare us to doctors is ridiculous. We don't incur the amount of debt nor are we required to go through the same type of schooling doctors are. And this job certainly isn't brain surgery.
|
Originally Posted by uptpilot
(Post 2147301)
Aerospace does require an almost comparable level of education and discipline. The problem is that pilots are given a wide latitude of authority and non-supervision allowing them to get intellectually and operationally complacent. Also, it's "easy" when everything goes right. Even then, how often are you breaking requirements? Are you filing bird strike forms every time, are you reporting when you vacate an assigned altitude, are you doing a complete and proper brief every single time, are you using proper callouts every single time without exception, are you dealing with aircraft discrepancies strictly every single time or are you "deferring" them until it's convenient for the company or your commute home, are you turning on anti-ice strictly when the book says to do so, etc....?
You make your money in dealing with abnormal or emergency situations where you are required to do it correctly. This means that you have to have a lawyer level understanding of all the rules and regulations as well as an encyclopedic mastery of your flight manuals in addition to everything you would have learned in an undergraduate aviation degree. If we actually enforced the rules, there would be a gross amount of malpractice (the equivalence of it). So, please don't say it isn't brain surgery or some other analogy like it. If you can't explain supercooled droplets in theory and practice like you would hear in a college science class, then you are dangerous by virtue of academic insufficiency. Demeaning our own profession is a big problem for us which is why regional pilots get treated like garbage (it's their own fault). Act respectable, demand respect, and know everything there is to know. If you think the job is easy, then you are probably complacent or simply inexperienced. |
Originally Posted by MartinBishop
(Post 2146726)
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:50 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands