![]() |
Originally Posted by Learflyer
(Post 2801709)
I don’t understand. Two years for a final review?
|
Originally Posted by PontiusPilot
(Post 2801717)
The final review period is just a quarter (3 months.) The “2 years” is just an example accounting for a person successfully interviewing, and then waiting for their CPP seniority slot to come up for final review.
Ok. Thanks. |
FWIW......almost every story I’ve heard about people getting burned “for no reason”.......had a reason. They either don’t want to admit it to people, or don’t want to admit it to themselves.
But YES, that must be awful feeling. I sure as hell was sweating bullets for the same exact reason. |
What kind of things are holding these guys back?
|
Originally Posted by Erj135dude
(Post 2801219)
I checked them out and apparently if you're a woman in aviation you don't pay out of state tuition, but if you're a man you do. So F that.
|
Originally Posted by Ihavenoidea
(Post 2802016)
What kind of things are holding these guys back?
Again, zero transparency. |
Originally Posted by Puck Hawg
(Post 2802123)
Nobody knows. You don’t know if they looked at the final paperwork or if bad information was sent to UA. Not saying anyone is/has/was sending bad info, but people make mistakes, and those mistakes can cost you millions in a long career.
Again, zero transparency. |
Originally Posted by Ihavenoidea
(Post 2802016)
What kind of things are holding these guys back?
I'm no scientist but I can't think that sort of thing would promote a good culture. |
Originally Posted by afterburn81
(Post 2802365)
The only reason I heard from a guy that was turned down after essentially having the job for 24 months was that he refused an aircraft that was having pressurization issues coming out of Mexico. He felt the high terrain in the area was an unnecessary risk and didn't want to play games. Very safe and professional pilot. This happened about 2 months before the final review.
I'm no scientist but I can't think that sort of thing would promote a good culture. The rather condescending letter one gets pretty much outlines that. |
Originally Posted by afterburn81
(Post 2802365)
The only reason I heard from a guy that was turned down after essentially having the job for 24 months was that he refused an aircraft that was having pressurization issues coming out of Mexico. He felt the high terrain in the area was an unnecessary risk and didn't want to play games. Very safe and professional pilot. This happened about 2 months before the final review.
I'm no scientist but I can't think that sort of thing would promote a good culture. I don’t understand, United didn’t like the fact that he refused an aircraft in the name of safety? So they wanted him to shut up and fly? |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:32 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands