|
Originally Posted by JustSomePlt
(Post 3100634)
Any truth to the union letter mentioned at the end of this article?
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-h...yAh6DLQd9MeCSw |
Originally Posted by PeakEGT
(Post 3100706)
Everything we received on our end is true in this. The conspiracy theorist in me seems to think United spent ad dollars on this article to save on concessions.
|
Originally Posted by flyfast2u
(Post 3100654)
Do the WARN letters that were sent out have a shelf life? Only good for a certain amount of days before new ones would have to be sent out.
”EXTENSION OF NOTICE Additional notice is required when the date or schedule of dates of a planned plant closing or mass layoff is extended beyond the date or the ending date of any 14-day period announced in the original notice as follows: • If the employment action is postponed for less than 60 days, additional notice should be given as soon as possible and should include refer- ence to the earlier notice, the new action date, and the reason for the postponement. The notice need not be formal but should be given in a manner that will provide the information to all affected employees; or • If the postponement is for 60 days or more, a new notice is required. Routine periodic notice, given whether or not a plant closing or mass layoff is impending and with the intent to evade specific notice as required by WARN, is not acceptable.” |
Originally Posted by LoneStar32
(Post 3100587)
Sure, innocent "good ole' boy" pilot you. "NBC" lol, why don't you just post something from the Huff Post or Reddit while you are at it.
|
Originally Posted by SeeYa
(Post 3100724)
I’m going with the union itself or a member “leaked” it to Reuters
The article read like a conglomeration of this thread..... |
Originally Posted by Tom Bradys Cat
(Post 3100753)
Probably more like it was plastered right here on APC. Journos troll these places for juicy info and the insode scoop. Once they have it all they need to do is fill in the blanks.
The article read like a conglomeration of this thread..... |
Originally Posted by Knobcrk1
(Post 3100331)
Its going to be XJT that stays. Otherwise Commutair being cheaper UA would have already pulled the plug. They just want XJT to come down further. I think during these times being part of a more established operation is key to survival. The smaller ones probably won’t make it. Good luck to all.
|
Originally Posted by skigambia
(Post 3100622)
So, a journalist's educational pedigree to support the quality of their work vs how Kacynski's education created a homicidal, sociopath. Hmmmm. You're right. My bad.
|
Originally Posted by furloughfuntime
(Post 3100639)
The Oklahoma City Bomber served in the military. Guess veterans cant be trusted either.....
Do you see how stupid this line of thinking is? Viewing all alumni of higher education institutions with suspicion because of one guy is as dumb as being skeptical of all veterans because of one guy. The cult of ignorance and contempt you guys have for academics is unreal |
Originally Posted by Knobcrk1
(Post 3100331)
Its going to be XJT that stays. Otherwise Commutair being cheaper UA would have already pulled the plug. They just want XJT to come down further. I think during these times being part of a more established operation is key to survival. The smaller ones probably won’t make it. Good luck to all.
United hasn’t ever really g(n)as about who’s established being a key to survival. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:11 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands