![]() |
Originally Posted by CaptainNameless
(Post 632477)
But we are dying much more slowly (a 7 year slow-death profitless CPA with 6 years to go!) whoo hooo! Just hope we can get a few more profitless CPAs. Nothing like being essentially a public utility for the majors.
|
Originally Posted by ToiletDuck
(Post 632478)
Looks like someone gets it. Something at the company has to change. Currently still operating at a loss after closure of branded so something has to give. Lets hope it's not furloughs or a round two paycut.
or that they don't get 190s and pay their pilots $37 an hour to fly them :confused: |
Originally Posted by JetBlast77
(Post 632433)
I just don't get why United would bring XJT on this summer for "overcapacity" when they have been cutting routes left and right. There has to be something else going on. Then again, what do I know.
|
Originally Posted by JetBlast77
(Post 632502)
or that they don't get 190s and pay their pilots $37 an hour to fly them :confused:
|
Originally Posted by cybourg10
(Post 632454)
Every check airman and or union rep I have talked to said they do not expect more furloughs this fall. We will have more COLAs and plenty of RFLs in Sep and Oct but we may need every one for next spring/summer and a 6 month furlough doesn't help anyone. Remember last October and how we barely had any lines? The company also turned down the union's early out offer saying it doesn't make financial sense right now, we see that as a sign that no staffing changes are needed. Knock on wood.......
Also for all the brainiacs that rant and rave how the 50 seater is dead, looking back the past 5-10 years the strongest airlines inlcude CAL, AMR, and SWA how many 70 seat jest do you guys see flying for them? AMR has the tightest scope (other than CAL) for 51+ seat jets, look at DAL, USairways etc all the 70 seat jet feed in the world didnt help their balance sheet. You people thing 70 seat regional feed is the saving grace for majors, it really isnt |
Originally Posted by JoeyMeatballs
(Post 632547)
FWIW, I am the EWR Union Rep (F/O) and I am not so sure they are correct, call me if you want to discuss, phone numbers on our ALPA website
Also for all the brainiacs that rant and rave how the 50 seater is dead, looking back the past 5-10 years the strongest airlines inlcude CAL, AMR, and SWA how many 70 seat jest do you guys see flying for them? |
Originally Posted by Bloodhound
(Post 632290)
Actually, I did mean XJT. In other words, CAL may be dropping 11,000 hours from their system, including CAL, XJT, Colgan, CHQ, etc. As opposed to dropping XJT's block hours by 11,000.
|
Originally Posted by GoBlue
(Post 632758)
How many 50 seaters does Southwest have?
|
Originally Posted by JetBlast77
(Post 632502)
or that they don't get 190s and pay their pilots $37 an hour to fly them :confused:
|
Originally Posted by JoeyMeatballs
(Post 632546)
no kidding, maybe TD should be more concerned about that rather than the future of XJT
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:39 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands